Manchester United

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Tatterdemalion
    replied
    Originally posted by danperkins


    It really depends on the squad you have whether you can balance playing/resting your better players. Some teams can do it, others not so much. Having full focus domestically without that distraction of European footie also can definitely prove a bit advantage as you alluded to. We will absolutely see an improvement in United this year & I think likes of Forest & Bourn will struggle with the extra European burden.
    I agree wrt Forest and Bournemouth, but United had a big enough squad to contend with domestic and European competition. That wasn't their problem. Their problem is... well I don't care enough to know for sure, but seems to me like there really is no-one at the club who both gives a **** and has the talent to do anything about it. Maybe Amorim is the exception, but he'll be gone this time next year.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tatterdemalion
    replied
    I think United are more likely to get relegated this season coming than they are to get into the top 6. Their form at the arse end of last season was catastrophic and I don't see too many reasons why it would change. Sure there will be optimism initially, but it will fade real quick. I know it sounds extreme, but I wouldn't be too surprised to see them go down.

    EDIT : Obviously I would really hate to see that happen to such a glorious club

    Leave a comment:


  • SB
    replied
    £4000 on top of a season ticket sounds absurd

    Leave a comment:


  • BootRoom
    replied
    I'm sure the people in the focus groups were falling over themselves to let Sir Jim know how much they love this idea .... Hurry up and take my ****ing money!

    Leave a comment:


  • Angryred
    replied
    Originally posted by Deano
    It would appear United are using Klarna to pay for it over 4 years unlike the Wolves deal
    Haha, how the mighty have fallen!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Le Chef
    replied
    Originally posted by Deano
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football...s/c77vp1x32g5o

    Bryan Mbeumo deal

    United - we will not get the piss taken out of us - £50m is max
    Brentford - **** off
    United - we will not get the piss taken out of us - £55m is max
    Brentford - **** off
    United - we will not get the piss taken out of us - £60m is max
    Brentford - **** off
    Man Utd - we will wait
    United - we will not get the piss taken out of us - £65m is max
    Brentford - Alright - Add in £6m of doable add ons
    United - that's doable ta !

    Jason Wilcox - Take a bow son - Following in the great United tradition of overpaying
    It would appear United are using Klarna to pay for it over 4 years unlike the Wolves deal

    Leave a comment:


  • Le Chef
    replied
    Originally posted by frank the tank
    Rashford might be thinking that it'll be a new manager next summer if Barca don't buy him
    From what I've read it goes deeper than Anorim - Given his contract length - he's got them over a barrel when Barca don't sign him next summer. United should have said get me a £15-£20m deal where you walk away with zero liability

    Leave a comment:


  • maxwellbaxter
    replied
    Originally posted by Deano
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football...s/c77vp1x32g5o

    Bryan Mbeumo deal

    United - we will not get the piss taken out of us - £50m is max
    Brentford - **** off
    United - we will not get the piss taken out of us - £55m is max
    Brentford - **** off
    United - we will not get the piss taken out of us - £60m is max
    Brentford - **** off
    Man Utd - we will wait
    United - we will not get the piss taken out of us - £65m is max
    Brentford - Alright - Add in £6m of doable add ons
    United - that's doable ta !

    Jason Wilcox - Take a bow son - Following in the great United tradition of overpaying

    Leave a comment:


  • frank the tank
    replied
    Originally posted by Deano
    Rashford takes a 25% cut, Utd left with paying the agent to sort the deal rumoured to be £5m, but they get a modest loan fee from Barca with a £30m fee if they decide to buy ( which they won't ) - After this season he still has 2 years left.
    Rashford might be thinking that it'll be a new manager next summer if Barca don't buy him

    Leave a comment:


  • Le Chef
    replied


    Bryan Mbeumo deal

    United - we will not get the piss taken out of us - £50m is max
    Brentford - **** off
    United - we will not get the piss taken out of us - £55m is max
    Brentford - **** off
    United - we will not get the piss taken out of us - £60m is max
    Brentford - **** off
    Man Utd - we will wait
    United - we will not get the piss taken out of us - £65m is max
    Brentford - Alright - Add in £6m of doable add ons
    United - that's doable ta !

    Jason Wilcox - Take a bow son - Following in the great United tradition of overpaying

    Leave a comment:


  • Le Chef
    replied
    Rashford takes a 25% cut, Utd left with paying the agent to sort the deal rumoured to be £5m, but they get a modest loan fee from Barca with a £30m fee if they decide to buy ( which they won't ) - After this season he still has 2 years left.

    Leave a comment:


  • red g
    replied
    Originally posted by danperkins


    It really depends on the squad you have whether you can balance playing/resting your better players. Some teams can do it, others not so much. Having full focus domestically without that distraction of European footie also can definitely prove a bit advantage as you alluded to. We will absolutely see an improvement in United this year & I think likes of Forest & Bourn will struggle with the extra European burden.
    As i pointed out to my Spurs and United fans wo take glee from this....regress and it would be relegation.

    Leave a comment:


  • danperkins
    replied
    Originally posted by frank the tank
    Chelsea last season essentially had a different squad for that euro Vauxhall conference thing they were in.

    Bournemouth and Forest are a good example of last season having very good years because they had no euro football. A couple of years ago, Newcastle had a good season and qualified for the champions league. The following season - when they were in the champions league - they didn't do so well. Last season again they had a good year because they had no euro football.

    Time will tell I suppose. I think the difference next year though will be that almost half the teams in the league will be playing European games midweek. Whereas before it was about 6 teams. So the advantage to the teams that don't have all of those extra games will be huge.

    I expect United to be ****e next year but still finish something like 6th or 7th. The rhetoric will then be "Rubens project on the right path" and they could possibly bomb the following season when they will be back in the Europa


    It really depends on the squad you have whether you can balance playing/resting your better players. Some teams can do it, others not so much. Having full focus domestically without that distraction of European footie also can definitely prove a bit advantage as you alluded to. We will absolutely see an improvement in United this year & I think likes of Forest & Bourn will struggle with the extra European burden.
    Last edited by danperkins; 21-07-25, 04:02 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • frank the tank
    replied
    Originally posted by RedReet
    Not sure that does hold up for me. Of course there is no way they'd have won the league if they were playing European matches that season, but there are also a million other factors that contributed to that miracle. There are about 12 Leicester's every year that never come close to achieving what they did, that was just a completely random and unexpected turn of events.

    Forest could have been a similar tale if they held on, but in the end they were caught by the bigger teams, ironically Chelsea in particular who finished strongly, despite still being in Europe.
    Chelsea last season essentially had a different squad for that euro Vauxhall conference thing they were in.

    Bournemouth and Forest are a good example of last season having very good years because they had no euro football. A couple of years ago, Newcastle had a good season and qualified for the champions league. The following season - when they were in the champions league - they didn't do so well. Last season again they had a good year because they had no euro football.

    Time will tell I suppose. I think the difference next year though will be that almost half the teams in the league will be playing European games midweek. Whereas before it was about 6 teams. So the advantage to the teams that don't have all of those extra games will be huge.

    I expect United to be ****e next year but still finish something like 6th or 7th. The rhetoric will then be "Rubens project on the right path" and they could possibly bomb the following season when they will be back in the Europa

    Leave a comment:


  • RedReet
    replied
    Originally posted by frank the tank
    Leicester surely the best example. I think they went out of both cups at the first hurdle that year too.
    Not sure that does hold up for me. Of course there is no way they'd have won the league if they were playing European matches that season, but there are also a million other factors that contributed to that miracle. There are about 12 Leicester's every year that never come close to achieving what they did, that was just a completely random and unexpected turn of events.

    Forest could have been a similar tale if they held on, but in the end they were caught by the bigger teams, ironically Chelsea in particular who finished strongly, despite still being in Europe.

    Leave a comment:

Working...