Manchester United

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • frank the tank
    replied
    Leicester surely the best example. I think they went out of both cups at the first hurdle that year too.

    Leave a comment:


  • RedReet
    replied
    Originally posted by Sus
    We nearly won the league in 2013/14 while only playing one game a week
    Good shout.

    Leave a comment:


  • SB
    replied
    Originally posted by Sus
    Ha so rude grandpa

    Leave a comment:


  • Sus
    replied
    Originally posted by SB
    Is that a Mikel Arteta quote ?
    Ha so rude grandpa

    Leave a comment:


  • SB
    replied
    Originally posted by Sus
    We nearly won the league in 2013/14 while only playing one game a week
    Is that a Mikel Arteta quote ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Sus
    replied
    Originally posted by RedReet
    Has that theory every been proved? Obviously it's very unusual for 'big' team not to be in Europe, but has there ever been a practical example to confirm that it actually is that much of a benefit?

    Don't get me wrong, the benefits are obvious, less travel, less matches, less burn out etc., but there are also downsides. There are less matches to keep squad players fit and healthy and less opportunities to develop younger players. Extra matches can help build momentum or help you get over a bad result. Similarly, a big win in Europe than lift the whole club and be the catalyst for better things.

    Also, teams have to make the most of the time off and training be effective. Some players may not react well to extra training and if the sessions are dull and/or ineffective, then that could even be detrimental. This should really show how good Amorim is. Most top players are also used to playing twice a week now and look after themselves better so again, it's not that much of an advantage.

    I think if there had of been international football on this summer, United might have benefitted a fair bit from not being in Europe, but as most players will have had a rare summer off, fatigue should be less of an issue next year (don't think United need to worry about City or Chelsea before anyone says ).
    We nearly won the league in 2013/14 while only playing one game a week

    Leave a comment:


  • Norbs
    replied
    Originally posted by RedReet
    Who on earth do you cheer for in week 1?
    UNITED, cha cha cha, UNITED

    Leave a comment:


  • vlahka
    replied
    All draws would be good enough for me.

    Leave a comment:


  • RedReet
    replied
    Originally posted by spud_gun
    They've got a hard start to the season

    Their first 5 games comprise of

    Arsenal Home
    Fulham Away
    Burnley Home
    Citeh Away
    Chelsea Home

    You could see them with 4 points from those games
    Who on earth do you cheer for in week 1?

    Leave a comment:


  • RedReet
    replied
    Originally posted by frank the tank
    They will have a decent season imo. The difference of not having European football will be huge. Approx half the teams will be in Europe next year while they have a week off in between games. From November to March that will be a huge advantage for them. Small squad required, not much rotation required. Against the bottom 8 or so teams that should help them in a big way both home and away
    Has that theory every been proved? Obviously it's very unusual for 'big' team not to be in Europe, but has there ever been a practical example to confirm that it actually is that much of a benefit?

    Don't get me wrong, the benefits are obvious, less travel, less matches, less burn out etc., but there are also downsides. There are less matches to keep squad players fit and healthy and less opportunities to develop younger players. Extra matches can help build momentum or help you get over a bad result. Similarly, a big win in Europe than lift the whole club and be the catalyst for better things.

    Also, teams have to make the most of the time off and training be effective. Some players may not react well to extra training and if the sessions are dull and/or ineffective, then that could even be detrimental. This should really show how good Amorim is. Most top players are also used to playing twice a week now and look after themselves better so again, it's not that much of an advantage.

    I think if there had of been international football on this summer, United might have benefitted a fair bit from not being in Europe, but as most players will have had a rare summer off, fatigue should be less of an issue next year (don't think United need to worry about City or Chelsea before anyone says ).

    Leave a comment:


  • spud_gun
    replied
    They've got a hard start to the season

    Their first 5 games comprise of

    Arsenal Home
    Fulham Away
    Burnley Home
    Citeh Away
    Chelsea Home

    You could see them with 4 points from those games

    Leave a comment:


  • Sus
    replied
    They are betting everything on this manager being the one to take them out of this ****show

    That’s a lot of pressure on him to deliver, and even if he is far better than what he has shown so far, there’s still the dysfunctional ownership, perilous financial position and toxic culture of the place

    It just feels a long way back for the club to be betting everything on the manager

    Really really really hope it goes tits up early in the season

    Leave a comment:


  • BG1973
    replied
    True but they have a manager under extreme pressure from the first kick.. if they start anything like they finished it could be very difficult for them very quickly.

    Which I think is going to happen.

    Leave a comment:


  • frank the tank
    replied
    They will have a decent season imo. The difference of not having European football will be huge. Approx half the teams will be in Europe next year while they have a week off in between games. From November to March that will be a huge advantage for them. Small squad required, not much rotation required. Against the bottom 8 or so teams that should help them in a big way both home and away

    Leave a comment:


  • red g
    replied
    Originally posted by Buzzo
    Mbuemo and Cunha definitely improve their attacking options.

    Just leaves, midfield, defence, keeper, squad size, wage bill, ownership and culture to fix.
    I Like both of them, I think with a couple more additions they could push into the top half.

    Leave a comment:

Working...