Manchester United
Collapse
X
-
Think it is a stupid decision. So if an English word happens to sound like something offensive in the language of foreign players playing in England, can they then look for action to be taken and ignore things like context and intent?
I think not.I don't hate people. I just feel better when they aren't around.
Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindednessComment
-
The irony to all this is that in treating this as a racism issue they are just highlighting their own lack of cultural awareness and xenophobia...The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.Comment
-
I don't hate people. I just feel better when they aren't around.
Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindednessComment
-
My feelings are that he deserves a ban for stupidity. In general there doesn’t need to be intent for something to be racist/racially offensive.
As a person who identifies as a white man, I don’t think it’s my place to say whether it’s offensive, but in my opinion it’s not... I think the FA backed themselves into a corner, by introducing the 3 match minimum rule- I think that this is a case where 1 match would be fair, and I don’t think united/cavani could complain at all. Bernardos post last year was a lot worse and was certainly offensive- somethings wrong when cavani is going to get 3 times the punishment that Bernardo got...
But as I say, he deserves what he’s gonna get for stupidity alone. I can’t believe that the clubs don’t have some sort of clause in the contract where that requires a club PR manager to sign off on online posts or something... this isn’t the first time a player has been banned for stupid online posts and it won’t be the last timeI don't tipComment
-
A Copyright claim. On that video
Football without Origi is nothingComment




Comment