No that was 1.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Harry Redknapp trial
Collapse
X
-
Dunno, haven't really followed it. Thanks for the explanation.Originally posted by Reece View PostOkay all humour Kenneth with a reply
I may be wrong here, but didn't Redknapp basically ADMIT evading tax during the case?
And I don't like him.
Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom-2 years1year0.5 years
Comment
-
****in Knew it! NOT guilty..



If someone like Rafa hafd gone through this trial, in this way, and be found not guilty, he wouldn't be able to work in this country again, the media would ridicule his every sentence, decision and opinion, based on all the stuff thats been put forward by 'Arry' in his defence.
Last edited by Vermilion; 08-02-12, 01:10 PM.
Comment
-
Of course there is no evidence, Harry's dog moved the money because Harry cant read and writeOriginally posted by Kenneth View PostBut was there any evidence that Harry moved income from his employment offshore to evade tax? Seemingly not. (although he's clearly guilty as sin)
Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."
Comment
-
So ignorence is infact an excuse then, well, at least when it comes to Arry..Originally posted by Scotsdave View PostI think the prosecution would have to prove motivation ie why was the money moved in the way it was... With no document to point to it goes to the testimony at trial which boils down to 'woops.'
Comment
-
You seem to be suggesting the jury was bent.Originally posted by malg View PostNot guilty what a joke, and we think we have a great legal system. Well at least he can go and ****up the England team now and spurs will fall by the wayside.
Have you seen all the evidence they were presented with over the course of a couple of weeks?
If so, can you elaborate on the flaws of the legal system?Oh I don't know.
Comment

Comment