Chelsea

[SB]

Could never imagine Klopp letting our owners into the change room except after a CL Final win or similar.

[Fosterbloke]

Can you imagine him shouting "You're not delivering value to our shareholder investors!"

**** off you ghouls.

[SB]

Brutal from Domino’s hahaha


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[frank the tank]

Ha ha ha brilliant

[frank the tank]

Wonder if john terry would take it

Or Jose

[Sus]

Wonder if john terry would take it

Or Jose

They'd first have to move the Chelsea womens (and under 17 girls) teams out of range if it was Terry

[Le Chef]

Chilwell out until next year, you gotta feel for em..............

[Charly]

They'd first have to move the Chelsea womens (and under 17 girls) teams out of range if it was Terry

His mum should be kept away from the LFC mens teams...

The whole city, really.

[SB]

Chelsea's heavy spending is set to continue in January with the club targeting Napoli's 24-year-old Nigeria striker Victor Osimhen and Brentford's England forward Ivan Toney, 27. (Guardian)

Chelsea are also seeking a £500m loan from US financial institutions to fund the signings after spending £1bn over the last three transfer windows.

Is there no end to this bull****?

[Charly]

If there is a limit on 5 year player amortisation, I dont see how they can sustain those levels of spend. Their revenue is not going up without Europe next year. Long contracts are not condusive to selling players to raise funds or balance the books, and have attracted players who may not hold their value due to being more interested on money and lifestyle. This feels like a ship sinking very slowly

[Norbs]

Slowly?

[Fosterbloke]

I thought the PL closed that loop now?

[Fivex]

I thought the PL closed that loop now?

They supposedly capped it to 5 years from the previous 8-9 or whatever chavs were doing

Nothing stopping them still offering the same contracts though, just can’t amortise over that silly length

[Fosterbloke]

They supposedly capped it to 5 years from the previous 8-9 or whatever chavs were doing

Nothing stopping them still offering the same contracts though, just can’t amortise over that silly length

That's more reasonable.

[Charly]

Its madness, though. On average how many players turn out to be crap at amy club? There must be significant pay rises built in based upon appearences, but how do you get a player whos on 100k a week off the books if they have failed? Few clubs will pay that wage, and if they player is there for the money, they have to pay them for nearly a decade, then lose for nothing, or pay up their contract.