The World Cup is going to be great. Hope Jack Wilshere has always wanted to be a defensive midfielder!
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
England v Italy match thread
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Lee View PostIMO Italy were beatable. Hodgson does have the excuse of having a depleted squad, but even with the players we had out there we still had enough to beat Italy.
Hodgson has no plan b though. It's the usual rigid 442, hold back, hoof it long, uninspiring line-ups and questionable subs. I think Capello would've shaken it up a bit more and out-witted Italy.
I think I was being harsh by saying that he could've "easily" got us into the SF.
Can't you just join me in laying the boot into the fossil?
Oh don't get me wrong the tactics of Hodgson are completely outdated and he has no idea of what to do when a change of formation and style is called for.
I just think that the squad assembled for this tournament was bang average barring a few players.
Gerrard looked ****ed as did Parker. Rooney Young and Milner were ****e. I thought Johnson was great and Terry (apart from playing everyone on from RB) was also good.
Walcott barely got a kick
Comment
-
the walcott sub didnt make sense. england didnt have the ball and they couldnt get into the game. hows technically one of the worst players in the squad going to help you get possession back in middle of the pitch.Originally posted by Chazza1978 View PostOh don't get me wrong the tactics of Hodgson are completely outdated and he has no idea of what to do when a change of formation and style is called for.
I just think that the squad assembled for this tournament was bang average barring a few players.
Gerrard looked ****ed as did Parker. Rooney Young and Milner were ****e. I thought Johnson was great and Terry (apart from playing everyone on from RB) was also good.
Walcott barely got a kick
im sure hodgson put him on with the intention of using his pace on the counter but england didnt have enough time on the transitions to get the ball to him.
should have brought downing on instead because at least he can help keep the ball when england did get it and is defensively disciplined enough to track back.[B]Sir Isaac Newton knew the universal law of karma - any action has its equal and opposite reaction.[B]
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chazza1978 View PostOh don't get me wrong the tactics of Hodgson are completely outdated and he has no idea of what to do when a change of formation and style is called for.
I just think that the squad assembled for this tournament was bang average barring a few players.
Gerrard looked ****ed as did Parker. Rooney Young and Milner were ****e. I thought Johnson was great and Terry (apart from playing everyone on from RB) was also good.
Walcott barely got a kick
It's incredible how light we were in the middle of the park. Gerrard and Parker - two players in their early 30's - having to carry us through a tournament. Big ask that and I do appreciate that Hodgson didn't have a massive pool of players to choose from.
At least Hodgson kept Downing away from the team, so he's got a bit more sense than I first thought.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Lee View Post
It's incredible how light we were in the middle of the park. Gerrard and Parker - two players in their early 30's - having to carry us through a tournament. Big ask that and I do appreciate that Hodgson didn't have a massive pool of players to choose from.
At least Hodgson kept Downing away from the team, so he's got a bit more sense than I first thought.
Still put him in the squad though over Adam Johnson or Lennon
The injuries can't be helped but the squad was well short in CM.
I think he realised that Jones wasn't a CM and it was too late then to get anyone else in.
I say anyone it would have probably been Leon Osman, or Danny Murphy
Comment
-
He isn't really, is he? It's just that he's like most English footballers in that he really doesn't give a **** about the national team because certain managers have done their best to destroy International football where as it should actually be the pinnacle of a footballers career.Originally posted by Leyton388 View PostAshley Young is the most pointless footballer of all time. He is **** and would be best suited lining up with Tom daley.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gibbo9 View PostThe played like you expect a team like Greece too.
If they would have got at the Italians I think they would have won, instead they tried to play the masters at their own game, that has significantly better passing and movement. And thats why they lost.
Roy should have had the bollocks to take Rooney and Young off too. Both where dire.
Spain apart they are probably the highest paid team in the tournament, a real indictment of how poor English football is.We come not to play.
Comment
-
I get you mean mate, but I just think there is a line that puts somethings keepers (and kickers) can do in those situations, and somethings they can't do.Originally posted by SimonNo7 View PostFair enough. I think doing 'jelly legs' suggesting that the player taking the penalty is ****ting himself (well that's the way I saw it all those years ago) is just as bad as roaring at a player, but hey, each to their own...
We've seen the jelly legs, keepers wandering up and down their line etc etc, but I think Hart was bordering on an unacceptable level of sportsmanship.
Trying to stare them out etc was fair enough, but when you could see him actually roaring out as the player was doing his run-up in an effort to put him off, puts him on the ball_bag list.
Made him look a right tool as well. Good keeper but he's fast becoming an A1 ******."I will make the boys feel your support"
Jurgen Klopp June 2020
Comment
-
People are saying that the Netherlands played similar tactics to those Hodgson adopted there is a difference though IMO. The Netherlands were playing against the best team in the world. England have been playing against decent teams but teams that are of similar quality to them and not giving them a game.The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
Comment
-
How can we be a man light? We matched them across midfield, man-for-man on paper?Originally posted by el matador View PostWere a man light in midfield in a 442 formation. You cannot press in midfield against their players because they will play around you.
Now if we played one striker and an attacking midfield player deeper then you can press but roy didnt do that. england lined up 442.
Again wrong formation against a team that will not give you the ball to build any sort of momentum.
If they'd played five across the middle, you may have a point, but they didn't. The Italians allowed Pirlo to drop off - this is not about one of the front two picking him up, because Rooney was quite clearly dropping deep himself - this was an English midfield axis that played in a straight horizontal line, five yards apart. When we had some joy going forward, it was because Parker started supporting the attack (however ineffective he was, but that's another chat).
A 4-4-2 (or 1-1) formation was more than capable of nullifying Pirlo, but we didn't want them getting behind us down the flanks, so we doubled up and let our wide midfielders fill the full back position, thus allowing their full backs to play as wing backs, out-numbering our midfield. That's why we looked like they would pass around us, it was because we had two in midfield to the Italians' six.
Far from the perfect tournament tactics.
Comment
-
I don't buy this bollocks that England players are technically and tactically inferior. I counted 4 champions league winners in the starting line up, and most of the rest have won the league.
I do buy into the theory that the manager is technically and tactically inferior though.Oh I don't know.
Comment
Comment