Theo Walcott

[kev776]

---------------Pepe.

Johnson--Skittle--Agger---A.N Other

---------Allen--Lucas

Sterling-------------------Suarez

--------Walcott--Huntlaar

[Lee]

But we play 4-3-3. Can't see Rodgers changing that.

[kev776]

we can play what we want, no team sticks to 4-3-3/4-4-2 etc, they evolve and change for each game. Mine is a mix of them all, much easier system, doesn't confuse the thicko players etc, halves the managers working week.

[RedReet]

We aren't gonna sign him. If we bring in a striker like Huntelaar then it's gonna be a line up of Suarez-Huntelaar-Sterling.

No point in stifling Sterling's development by bringing in a player that has been outshone this season by our own one. At a ridiculous fee, and even more obscene wage demands.

No brainer. **** off Walcott.

Where to start?

You may tell Brendan to cancel them 3 forwards he's looking if you've already picked the side. **** subs as well, who needs them...

[Lee]

we can play what we want, no team sticks to 4-3-3/4-4-2 etc, they evolve and change for each game. Mine is a mix of them all, much easier system, doesn't confuse the thicko players etc, halves the managers working week.

Okay, fine.

[peekay]

I honestly think he would be perfect with Suarez. As Suarez drops deep he would effectively be a striker even if nominally wide in the 3. I suspect that was the idea with Borini but Walcott did that job excellently in the PL with van Persie and I'd expect him to pick it up quickly for us.

I'd rather him that Huntelaar. Although at this stage I would probably take anyone who has scored more than 1 top level goal in their career.

Same here

[kev776]

Okay, fine.

Twas a joke mate, I was trying to prove how difficult it would be to accommodate 4 strikers into 2/3 positions, if Walcott and Huntlaar arrive I fear for Sterling, Borini is a BR buy and would be ahead of him too.

[Lee]

Twas a joke mate, I was trying to prove how difficult it would be to accommodate 4 strikers into 2/3 positions, if Walcott and Huntlaar arrive I fear for Sterling, Borini is a BR buy and would be ahead of him too.

Ah we'd be fine mate.

We play three up top out of Sterling, Suarez, Walcott and Huntelaar. Plus we'd have Borini when he's back which gives us a bit more depth.

With injuries, suspensions and loss of form then we'd keep those five happy. Also saves Sterling from getting burnt out.

And I'd much rather see one of Sterling, Walcott or Huntelaar on the bench than Cole or Downing.

[kubrickscube]

Ah we'd be fine mate.

We play three up top out of Sterling, Suarez, Walcott and Huntelaar. Plus we'd have Borini when he's back which gives us a bit more depth.

With injuries, suspensions and loss of form then we'd keep those five happy. Also saves Sterling from getting burnt out.

And I'd much rather see one of Sterling, Walcott or Huntelaar on the bench than Cole or Downing.

Nail on head.

[Vermilion]

[Robbie-9-Fowler]

Maybe Suarez in the 'False 9' could be one of the midfielders in games not against the big 5 or 6?

-------------------Reina
Johnson------Skrtel-----Agger------Taylor?
--------------Lucas-----Allen
--Walcott---------Suarez---------Sterling
-----------------Huntelaar

I know it looks a little unbalanced but Sterling, Suarez and Walcott would over so much work rate it might be able to work.

Highly doubt we'd ever see it mind but just thinking.

[Fan65]

Maybe Suarez in the 'False 9' could be one of the midfielders in games not against the big 5 or 6?

-------------------Reina
Johnson------Skrtel-----Agger------Taylor?
--------------Lucas-----Allen
--Walcott---------Suarez---------Sterling
-----------------Huntelaar

I know it looks a little unbalanced but Sterling, Suarez and Walcott would over so much work rate it might be able to work.

Highly doubt we'd ever see it mind but just thinking.

Wot no Gerrard?

[kev776]

Wot no Gerrard?

would you put him ahead of Allen or Lucas.

[SB]

would you put him ahead of Allen or Lucas.

Not this year no.

[kris90210]

Regardless, Gerrard will be first team this year - there's no doubt about it.