Tom Ince

[RichC]

So he turned us down to play for Palace; if he did turn us down I can only imagine it would be down to the no doubt ludicrous wages he was likely to be demanding.

Pleased we didn't bother with this lad, I fear he'd have ended up another "squad filler" if he'd joined us.

Need better.

[Darkon]

So he turned us down to play for Palace; if he did turn us down I can only imagine it would be down to the no doubt ludicrous wages he was likely to be demanding.

Pleased we didn't bother with this lad, I fear he'd have ended up another "squad filler" if he'd joined us.

Need better.

Or simply that he wanted guarenteed first team football, which would be very unlikely here. Doing what's best for his development rather than money? Or are they all cynical?

[Vermilion]

his old man reckons he turned us down
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport...erpool-6672969

Paul, who made 81 appearances for Liverpool between 1997 and 1999, claims the Reds were one of the teams interested, but said that a move to Anfield would have come too soon for his son.

He said: “Liverpool were in but I don’t think Thomas is ready to go to Liverpool yet.

“Brendan (Rodgers) has done very well there and he does play the kids but for his progression as a footballer it needed to be a Stoke, a Swansea, a Palace or a Hull at this point.

Fair enough.

[RichC]

Or simply that he wanted guarenteed first team football, which would be very unlikely here. Doing what's best for his development rather than money? Or are they all cynical?

Cynical

[tanner]

one of four according to the Express

"After promising Liverpool fans a 'major' signing before deadline day, the Reds ended up empty-handed.

Rodgers' pursuit of Yevhen Konoplyanka fell through at the final hour, but is expected to be revived in the summer.

Chelsea beat Liverpool to the acquisition of Egyptian star Mohamed Salah, while former Barcelona star Seydou Keita claims he snubbed a move to Anfield to join Valencia."

Obviously knew about 2 of them, wasn't aware that we were back in for Ince or Keita.

[baitman]

ince snr [**** ince] is also his [ince jnr's] agent so maybe just trying to use the LFC name to get his client in the papers again.

maybe we were in for him, who knows. maybe he feels his best chance is to go to palace on loan, show he has some worth, run his contract out and then get a big bucks deal with a decent team.

it will be very interesting to see how he does for palace against some decent prem teams and their de-fence.

[Shaggy]

I don't believe Paul Ince for a minute.

[Norbs]

Fair enough.

If true

[Frenchie]

We shouldn't have anything to do with either of them. Paul Ince with his self adopted moniker of the Guvnor is a deluded ****.

[baitman]

We shouldn't have anything to do with either of them. Paul Ince with his self adopted moniker of the Guvnor is a deluded ****.

the dad is a cock of the highest order

but if the young lad shows his worth...

[dom9]

Ince Snr was one of the players that I supported through gritted teeth when he was at LFC. I have always disliked him.

[Frenchie]

the dad is a cock of the highest order

but if the young lad shows his worth...

apple, tree etc...

[baitman]

apple, tree etc...

yeh, it would seem to be the obvious, but i kinda think that to exclude him from our maybe list is to possibly miss out.
anyways, time will tell. by the summer people will have seen him going up against decent defenders and then make a better assessment of his abilities.

[Doc_Piptorious]

his old man reckons he turned us down
http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/sport...erpool-6672969

His old man also had some ideas about being a manager, so would not put much stock in anything reckoned by the likes of Paul Ince

[baitman]

motm for palace today ;http://www.goal.com/en-gb/match/1095...player-ratings