Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Transfers (General)

Collapse
This is a sticky topic.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Doc_Piptorious
    replied
    Originally posted by Slinky Skills View Post
    Some free agents that can still be signed.

    Martial, Depay & Rabiot - the free agents still available - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/a...s/cpvyjwjr17no

    Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk



    Depay I would have as cover on a short incentive heavy contract.




    Too much baggage with Rabiot.

    Leave a comment:


  • Slinky Skills
    replied
    We were linked with Rabiot at one point were we not? Bit of a bellend though apparently.

    Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • spud_gun
    replied
    Quite a bit of wasted potential on that list. Wouldn't want any of them at Liverpool at this stage in their careers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Slinky Skills
    replied
    Some free agents that can still be signed.

    Martial, Depay & Rabiot - the free agents still available - https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/a...s/cpvyjwjr17no

    Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Cerbie
    replied
    Originally posted by Angryred View Post
    Not for Brentford as they get rid of an itch & get well paid for it!!
    It's fair to say he has issues. I think it's a fantastic deal for Brentford and will help Frank with his squad management.

    Toney is Balotelli-esque for me. It will be interesting to see how long he can stick it out in Suadi for...

    Leave a comment:


  • Angryred
    replied
    Originally posted by spud_gun View Post
    https://twitter.com/MirrorDarren/sta...33341042405881

    Seems a waste....money on offer must be incredible
    Not for Brentford as they get rid of an itch & get well paid for it!!

    Leave a comment:


  • spud_gun
    replied
    [ame]https://twitter.com/MirrorDarren/status/1829433341042405881[/ame]

    Seems a waste....money on offer must be incredible

    Leave a comment:


  • Slinky Skills
    replied
    Trindande to Wolves.



    Sent from my SM-S711B using Tapatalk

    Leave a comment:


  • Irishnev
    replied
    Originally posted by Doc_Piptorious View Post
    Let's see.

    One club is Saudi owned, one club has it's what looks to be it's new owner in talks with the Saudi's over a 1.1 billion dollar deal to buy another club from that person's portfolio, and the third club had a multi billion Saudi investment into it's parent company.


    The owner of the fourth club has just moved his family offices to the Middle East and of course completely unlinked to anything have received massive contracts from both UAE and Saudi companies.
    Sure it’s all grand….

    Leave a comment:


  • Doc_Piptorious
    replied



    Let's see.

    One club is Saudi owned, one club has it's what looks to be it's new owner in talks with the Saudi's over a 1.1 billion dollar deal to buy another club from that person's portfolio, and the third club had a multi billion Saudi investment into it's parent company.


    The owner of the fourth club has just moved his family offices to the Middle East and of course completely unlinked to anything have received massive contracts from both UAE and Saudi companies.

    Leave a comment:


  • Tatterdemalion
    replied
    I think there absolutely does need to be a regulator for football.

    1) As Kenneth says, the clubs can't do it for themselves - clear conflict of interest.
    2) With huge amounts of money at stake, there is a clear risk of consumer harm (monopolistic/oligopolistic behaviour, money laundering risks, bad faith contracts (like Chelsea's 8 year deals), unfair fan treatment, the list goes on..
    3) Unfortunately it is perfectly clear that the FA and Premier League cannot regulate the game as they are intimidated by its' most affluent members.
    4) The current regulators don't understand what it means to conduct due diligence on a business owner because there is no penalty for them in getting it wrong (hate banks as much as you like but the good ones are seriously good at due dil to protect themselves).
    5) The most successful clubs are only incentivised to look after themselves ; lower echelons of the game are strangled which damages the sport as a past-time and as a potential career path.

    Unfortunately unless a government led regulator is imposed around the rest of Europe (or better yet UEFA is told to crack on or do one by the ECJ) it will diminish the English game in Europe, but frankly I would prefer genuine football to a sports-washed kleptocracy.
    Last edited by Tatterdemalion; 23-06-24, 06:29 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Kenneth
    replied
    Clubs don’t even need to inflate values to make it work. Swap a £10m player from the ressies for an equivalent, give them a 5 year contracts, both clubs bank the £10m income immediately and account the new player at £2m cost per year. Rinse and repeat.

    I couldn’t have more skeptical about a government regulator when it was touted, but it’s clear that the clubs can’t regulate themselves.
    Last edited by Kenneth; 23-06-24, 04:29 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lee
    replied
    It stinks.

    Bobby Clark and James McConnell must be worth £70m each based on those ridiculous valuations.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bloodraven
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Exiled_red
    replied
    This may be something to watch...

    [ame="https://twitter.com/Rory_Talks_Ball/status/1804470392775401859"]https://twitter.com/Rory_Talks_Ball/status/1804470392775401859[/ame]

    [ame="https://twitter.com/markgoldbridge/status/1804489956443689103"]https://twitter.com/markgoldbridge/status/1804489956443689103[/ame]

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X