Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Transfer News

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by enema of the state View Post


    its a semantic argument only. zonal or man to man only determines what starting positions you take up. At the end of the day, If a defender reads the flight of the ball, runs quickly, jumps well and clears it then the situation is defended. its possible to do those things from either set up.

    what determines how good any defence is is how well the individuals execute those techniques - not which set up the coach tells them to start from.
    Yeah.
    Rafa seems to have the lads knowing what their job is. Alot relies on the goalkeepers relationship wiith the defenders too though.
    Bill shankly to Tommy Smith after he'd turned up for training with a bandaged knee:
    'Take that poof bandage off, and what do you mean YOUR knee, it's LIVERPOOL'S knee !'

    "Sorry, boss, I should have kept my legs together," said Lawrence. "No, Tommy, your mother should have kept her legs together!," replied Shankly.

    * After Tommy Lawrence had let in a fluke goal between his legs

    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by enema of the state View Post
      i guessed that - but football was played for quite some time before august 2006. Some of the current lfc team were even playing way back in those historical days.

      Really, never would have guessed that, btw it is a complete misnoma that goldfish have very short memories, they don't.
      www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

      www.twitter.com/lbmlt

      www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
        Really? I'd have thought it's more than mere semantics but then I'm no expert.
        you are to be congratulated for being such a modest man and being free of such vices as sarcasm

        if you disagree with a forcefully stated opinion perhaps you should challenge it with information - in a similar way to which it was made - rather than trying to make yourself seem big and clever with the "wit" of your little dig.

        just my opinion but then I'm no expert
        drunk knows best

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Mattshark View Post
          Really, never would have guessed that, btw it is a complete misnoma that goldfish have very short memories, they don't.
          how about sharks?
          drunk knows best

          Comment


            #35
            Originally posted by enema of the state View Post
            how about sharks?
            Relatively intelligent, more so than most birds and a some mammals.
            www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

            www.twitter.com/lbmlt

            www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

            Comment


              #36
              Originally posted by Mattshark View Post
              Relatively intelligent, more so than most birds and a some mammals.
              And what about Mattshark specifically?
              Like blood on iron

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by Red_Polo View Post
                And what about Mattshark specifically?
                Very, my remark was just taken out of context and thanks to my exam today all I can thing bout is intertidal communitys and vicariance.
                www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

                www.twitter.com/lbmlt

                www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Mattshark View Post
                  Very, my remark was just taken out of context and thanks to my exam today all I can thing bout is intertidal communitys and vicariance.
                  Like blood on iron

                  Comment


                    #39
                    Originally posted by Mattshark View Post
                    Very, my remark was just taken out of context and thanks to my exam today all I can thing bout is intertidal communitys and vicariance.
                    mate have a



                    good luck with the exam. we need guys like you the cosequences of chippys running out of cod are just too bad to contemplate
                    drunk knows best

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by enema of the state View Post
                      you are to be congratulated for being such a modest man and being free of such vices as sarcasm

                      if you disagree with a forcefully stated opinion perhaps you should challenge it with information - in a similar way to which it was made - rather than trying to make yourself seem big and clever with the "wit" of your little dig.

                      just my opinion but then I'm no expert
                      Actually mate I was being serious. I don't understand how it's just a semantic difference.
                      .
                      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                      May the Lord bless this post.

                      Comment


                        #41
                        Originally posted by enema of the state View Post
                        mate have a



                        good luck with the exam. we need guys like you the cosequences of chippys running out of cod are just too bad to contemplate
                        I would but I have Animal survival stratergies on Wed and Fish Bio on fri, as much as I have an interest in fish, ionic regulaton at a cellular level is not my favourite area of study. But thank you.
                        www.Liverpoolbaymlt.org

                        www.twitter.com/lbmlt

                        www.Facebook.com/liverpoolbaymarinelifetrust

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                          Actually mate I was being serious. I don't understand how it's just a semantic difference.
                          the debate comes down to the meanings of "zonal" and "man to man"

                          people assume these terms subsume the whole process of how you defend a dead ball - they dont - they determine only where you start.

                          if you stood in random starting positions you could still judge where the ball is going where the attackers are running to and defend the set piece - you can make EXACTLY the same header in the same position from both set ups.

                          this argument comes up again and again and its root is in the meaning of the 2 terms - semantics
                          drunk knows best

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Thanks. So should I deduce that in zonal marking once the free kick or whatever has been taken then players leave their zones and not stay there for the second ball?

                            By the way, I know what semantics means, thanks.
                            .
                            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                            May the Lord bless this post.

                            Comment


                              #44
                              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                              Thanks. So should I deduce that in zonal marking once the free kick or whatever has been taken then players leave their zones and not stay there for the second ball?:
                              you should deduce that in zonal marking - or man-to man - the defenders need to react to the dynamics: flight of the ball, runs of the attacker etc - to defend successfully.

                              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                              By the way, I know what semantics means, thanks.
                              I'm sure you do - i was explaining why i called it a semantic argument not teaching you the meaning of the word but if thats how you took it

                              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                              drunk knows best

                              Comment


                                #45
                                OK, cheers.

                                End of.
                                .
                                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                                May the Lord bless this post.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X