Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

a few inescapable conclusions...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    First half we were quality, if we get a couple of players who can do the biz in the final third then we'll be in with a very strong chance of winning the league next season. We played with the perfect balance, it was only in the second half when we lost that balance as we sat back in the knowledge we could afford to concede a goal that they started to look threatening.
    Like blood on iron

    Comment


      #92
      Originally posted by brikkis View Post
      Football has changed a lot since then mate. Training methods, making players much more fit have improved. This is 2007. Your sitting in a time warp mate - No offence intended
      cheers for the only potentially constructive criticism of any of my posts. i like my time-warp though. in my time warp we're not just chelsea with with worse players...
      Felching ≠ Gerbilling

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by captainfog View Post
        Barcelona try and play that kind of football and look what happened to them.

        Anyway I thought we were very exciting last night, especially in the first half
        one of my central points is that they didn't. nor am i suggesting that attack minded football is totally gung-ho for 90 minutes.
        Felching ≠ Gerbilling

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by fah-q View Post
          But we had 11 players who played like a team (well 10 when Pennant came on) whereas they had a collection of individuals who when pressured and closed down couldn't provide much inspiration.
          i wasn't talking about barca, i was responding to a post that said ac milan in the 90's would have killed them, and i was saying that comparing us to that Ac Milan side is unfair cause they were a fare superior team, and only gerrard could get in to the side thats how good they were...
          "I have decided to escape, to defy the shogun. Today I will begin walking the road to hell. But you will choose your own path. So, soon you may be seeing heaven. Choose the sword, and you will join me. Choose the ball and you join your mother, in death. You don’t understand my words, but you must choose. So… come boy, choose life or death."

          "You would've been happier if you'd chosen to join your mother in her world. " - Ogami Itto

          Comment


            #95
            Originally posted by Redspin View Post
            **** me, some people are never satisfied.

            One of the reasons I look at Liverpool forums less and less theses days is that they seem to be largely populated by the kind of people who would phone in to You're On Sky Sports or 6-0-6.

            We knock out the CURRENT European chapions when few outside our fanbase gave us any hope and still we get nit-pickers on how we went about it.

            If we go on to win it no doubt the originator of this thread will still be whingeing and slagging off players
            Rafa is never 100% happy with how we have played, he always find some faults even if we have played a fantastic game. I guess that some of us do the same thing.
            Just believe and you never know what will happen.

            According to Benitez it's important not simply to go out to win but to go out prepared to win, which means players have to put in the same level of work on a daily basis. Anything else is unacceptable.

            Comment


              #96
              Originally posted by bloody and porcine View Post
              cheers for the only potentially constructive criticism of any of my posts.
              FLMAO!!!
              --== Because the gang and the government is no different ==--

              Comment


                #97
                Originally posted by AFII View Post
                Rafa is never 100% happy with how we have played, he always find some faults even if we have played a fantastic game. I guess that some of us do the same thing.
                Each to their own and all that but I can't help feeling it's missing the point.
                .
                Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                May the Lord bless this post.

                Comment

                Working...
                X