Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What will it take to make Reds Champions by Paul Tomkins

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
    #31
    Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
    Was he brought on specifically to get a goal or to add something different so someone in the team got a goal?
    to get a goal.

    Comment

      #32
      Originally posted by Helios Creed View Post
      to get a goal.


      Thanks for clearing that up Rafa.
      .
      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



      May the Lord bless this post.

      Comment

        #33
        Originally posted by Helios Creed View Post
        to get a goal.
        i think your wrong mate, but it's all oppinions
        Thomas Hicks Senior

        Comment

          #34
          Originally posted by Neil Young View Post


          Thanks for clearing that up Rafa.
          Lip-reading. Every single time, as he went on, Rafa said "go on hand get hus a goal".

          Comment

            #35
            Originally posted by Helios Creed View Post
            Lip-reading. Every single time, as he went on, Rafa said "go on hand get hus a goal".
            AFII can confirm it. Rafa and he think alike.
            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment

              #36
              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
              He's very thorough. Is he paid by the word?


              He used 3,000 plus words there when a couple of hundred would've done the job just as well.
              I hate Polanski

              Comment

                #37
                another great piece
                not at all long winded and dragged out
                Parry is a clown. En Rafa que confiamos

                Comment

                  #38
                  Originally posted by keniget View Post
                  Christ that was long - I couldn't make it till the end.

                  At the end of the day, Anfield could be burning down as we speak and he'd still find a way to put a positive spin on it.
                  Spot on. Guess what? Watford would have won the league this year based on his theories. A shambolic piece of journalism clutching at straws, all clubs aren't going to spend the same amount of money, accept it.

                  He should be fired for that piece of journalism.

                  Comment

                  Previous 1 2 3 template Next
                  Working...
                  X