Question Time Tonight - ex-editor of the rag is a guest.

[irishgeo]

see the ex- editor of the paper who we all hate is a guest on question time tonight.

just letting people know in case you accidentally flick it on.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/proginfo/guests/wk41.shtml

[Rigadon]

What is it with the BBC and MacKenzie these days? No need

[CharlieMansonsSquint]

Unbelievable.

This after what happened in January, and the December before that?

I pay some of my TV license to have the Beeb hire this cuntface?

Hope he gets cancer of the eyes.

[Red_Polo]

The quality of panellists on that programmes has been decreasing rapidly for the last two years. The fact they see fit to have this **** on there is testament to that. I will not be watching it again.

[Shaggy]

Sickening. Again. The ****ing BBC have been inundated with complaints about this the last two times - and they just ignore it all and the ****'s on the panel again? Feel like not paying my ****ing licence fee.

[Chris]

Wish I could say I was surprised but it's not a surprise at all.

Sent an email of complaint again but doubt it'll do anything unfortunately. Hopefully someone in the studio murders him. PLEASE LET IT HAPPEN!

[Kenneth]

Sickening. Again. The ****ing BBC have been inundated with complaints about this the last two times - and they just ignore it all and the ****'s on the panel again? Feel like not paying my ****ing licence fee.

Well I don't think the BBC should be guided by the number of complaints they received. I can't believe they think ****s like him and Piers Morgan have anything to say that's worth listening to.

[Shaggy]

Well I don't think the BBC should be guided by the number of complaints they received. I can't believe they think ****s like him and Piers Morgan have anything to say that's worth listening to.

Well obviously that's the more baffling and probably even more pertinent issue...and I realise it'd be naive to expect them to be guided by the number of complaints received - but in this instance...surely, SURELY they should take heed and respect what is a very sensitive issue by not having that scumbag piece of **** McKenzie on again? I mean...what have they got to lose? It's not as if he's Tony Benn or...I dunno...Brian ****ing Walden.

[The Glove]

He will bring in viewers.

[Alpha]

MacKenzie

On Question Time. Again. :whatever:

Harriet Harman accusing him of talking poisonous ****. Tell us something we don't know.

I hopeful Simon Hughes MP and David Dimbleby will take it upon themselves to perfom an impromptu re-enactment of the greenhouse scene from Scum on him.

[The Glove]

On Question Time. Again. :whatever:

Harriet Harman accusing him of talking poisonous ****. Tell us something we don't know.

I hopeful Simon Hughes MP and David Dimbleby will take it upon themselves to perfom an impromptu re-enactment of the greenhouse scene from Scum on him.

Dont watch him. Letters/emails of complaint dont work. The only way to get the BBC to do anything is for them to lose viewers. They'd never have him back if viewing figures dropped every time he was on.

[CharlieMansonsSquint]

He got a round of applause at the beginning.

Smug ****.

[James]

Sickening. Again. The ****ing BBC have been inundated with complaints about this the last two times - and they just ignore it all and the ****'s on the panel again? Feel like not paying my ****ing licence fee.

A friend of mine was a grade 2 ref and he used to get dogs abuse from Jim McLean at reserve matches.

Every time he complained the SFA would phone up my mate and tell him not to worry about it and he will def be refereeing the next game involving McLeans team.

Seems like the same attitude.

[Red_hot]

Getting booed now for remarks against Scots. Odious little prick.

[Dhav]

Why have the BBC got someone on who has proven time and time again that he has no integrity whatsoever?

Not watching it btw