Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
well I personally believe that Rafa picks his teams and his tactics in order for him to be as successful as possible at his job. I don't think he gives a jot about the media or the so called football pundits. He picks his teams to get himself the best possible outcome, afterall it is his job o the line if it goes tits up.
I'd rather have a manager who picks his own team than a soft **** who changes his mind when the going gets tough. You need leadership and vision, if you don't have those qualities you will never be a good manager.
I couldnt argue with that.
But i also feel that you need a manager who can hold his hand up and admit to himself when something isnt working - and then change it. I'm not sure Rafa is willing to do this often enough.
Should he not dare to hold a different opinion to a Champions League winning manager?
You call it expressing an opinion, I call it a half-wit passing judgement on his intellectual superior.
It's so easy for these pundits to hide behind the simplistic old argument "it's only an opinion, which we're entitled to have". But let's be honest they're not merely giving an opinion - they're passing judgement. And if they want to do so they should also acknowledge the fact that they are judging people who are eminently more qualified than they are. There's a reason why they're not paid to make decisions, they're paid to criticise them
You call it expressing an opinion, I call it a half-wit passing judgement on his intellectual superior.
It's so easy for these pundits to hide behind the simplistic old argument "it's only an opinion, which we're entitled to have". But let's be honest they're not merely giving an opinion - they're passing judgement. And if they want to do so they should also acknowledge the fact that they are judging people who are eminently more qualified than they are. There's a reason why they're not paid to make decisions, they're paid to criticise them
But by that logic, none of us should be entitled to express any viewpoints which criticise the manager's decision.
I think the main issue here is this is stan collymore we're talking about
Stan Collymore, who as an ex-pro, is probably far more qualified than us (if we're using the 'he is/was in the game, so knows more than those who arent/werent' rule)...
Stan Collymore, who as an ex-pro, is probably far more qualified than us (if we're using the 'he is/was in the game, so knows more than those who arent/werent' rule)...
Comment