Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clattenberg dumped!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    As I said in the match thread;

    Originally posted by leviathan1984 View Post
    Clattenberg's generally safe, got no issues with him
    Maybe I should show more respect for referee's more often

    Comment


      #17
      He should be knighted for the other day. A faultless display and one which should form the template for all local derby matches.

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by Icon View Post
        I'm sure SG can get that changed!
        LOL!!
        "Sir, it's me sir. Jennings sir."

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by tsb View Post
          He should be knighted for the other day. A faultless display and one which should form the template for all local derby matches.
          Hear hear

          Comment


            #20
            That's a bit of a surprise really, ok he got a few decisions wrong but nothing on the scale of Styles at Anfield. The main things he did wrong for me was getting the yellow out and then appearing to change his mind after Gerrard spoke to him and in all fairness Kuyt probably should of gone for the Karate kick as per the letter of the law.

            The Lescott decisions were tough to call, i don't think he saw Finnans first one and players blocked the view of the Carra one at the end and to be fair i thought he leaned into him looking for the pen so tough ****ing **** bluenose.

            For me the main thing was he kept reasonable control over what is always a fast paced, fiery encounter. For me Clattenburg is one of the more consistent refs in the Premier League.

            Comment


              #21
              Get him ready for the Scum game in Christmas

              Comment


                #22
                Why is anyone surprised? He was our man of the match. Legend.

                Comment


                  #23
                  A Bluenose has obviously edited Mr Clattenburg's wiki record;

                  During the local derby match between Everton and Liverpool on October 20, 2007, he declined Everton's appeals for a penalty in the third minute of added time, seconds before the final whistle, when Jamie Carragher pulled Everton's Joleon Lescott to the ground in the Liverpool six yard box. Tony Hibbert and Phil Neville from the home side both received red cards from Clattenburg during the match, although Hibbert's was controversial as Clattenburg had drawn a yellow card from his pocket, but then showed a red card after Liverpool captain Steven Gerrard spoke to him. Clattenburg also neglected to send off Liverpool's Dirk Kuyt after a shocking two-footed aerial challenge, instead only showing him a yellow card instead of the straight red that the offence should have warranted. Following this disastrous display, it was confirmed by the FA Premier League that Clattenburg would not officiate any match on the weekend of November 3.

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by superdan View Post
                    Someone has to start a petition!
                    Maybe we should start a small collection as a token of our support.
                    I'm playing all the right notes. Not necessarily in the right order. I'll give you that, sunshine.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      It's typical FA anti-Liverpool bias that our Man of the Match gets banned for his performance.
                      .
                      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                      May the Lord bless this post.

                      Comment


                        #26
                        TBH the only thing I can see he should be reprimanded for is the Kuyt kung fu incident, everything else was either correct or incidents he couldn't see
                        Thomas Hicks Senior

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by Morphorino View Post
                          TBH the only thing I can see he should be reprimanded for is the Kuyt kung fu incident, everything else was either correct or incidents he couldn't see
                          The Kuyt challenge (not the "Kuyt kung fu incident" ) was not a definite sending off. He certainly could have been and maybe he should have been but it wasn't a certainty like a lot of people (including too many people on here) are making out.
                          .
                          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                          May the Lord bless this post.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                            The Kuyt challenge (not the "Kuyt kung fu incident" ) was not a definite sending off. He certainly could have been and maybe he should have been but it wasn't a certainty like a lot of people (including too many people on here) are making out.
                            he left the floor, two feet off the ground, it's a sending off, I don't see how there can be any discussion on the matter
                            Thomas Hicks Senior

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by Morphorino View Post
                              he left the floor, two feet off the ground, it's a sending off, I don't see how there can be any discussion on the matter
                              He didn't make contact, it wasn't studs first.

                              That's why it's a matter of opinion on whether it was a yellow or a red.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                                He didn't make contact, it wasn't studs first.

                                That's why it's a matter of opinion on whether it was a yellow or a red.
                                the rule is if both feet are off the floor, not if he connects with him and breaks his leg, it just isn't a matter of oppinion it's a matter of fact
                                Thomas Hicks Senior

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X