players or stadium?

[red g]

I see G & T getting a load of grief and got me thinking. IF DIC did come on and lets say they did buy the Kaka's of this world but we moved into that crappy new stadium

what would u prefer? fantastic stadium and worry or DIC(maybe worry) and **** stadium but great players/

[red g]

I think it has to be the stadium as that will be a legacy for many years to come.

[vocey]

I think it goes hand in hand with each other, great stadium with a **** team is empty and no revenue, great team ****/small stadium less revenue.
this leads to us being non-sustainable, and we end up like leeds,
great team then a great stadium we win all ends up.

[tomasjj]

A bit of both, but if you have to put the strain on one of the two, it would sadly have to be players. The stadium is the future for LFC for 100 years or so.

Sell some squadies - promote the best youngsters (Insua, Hobbs) and buy to cover the holes in the first 11.

[AFII]

I think DIC would have done both so they would get the best possible profit when they had decided to sell.

A new excellent stadium and a winning team.

[Shaggy]

Do we have to choose?

[The Erectile Banana]

We shouldn't have to choose.

We should have great players and a great stadium. Concentrating on one to the detriment of the others is a bad, bad idea.

[red g]

I think DIC would have done both so they would get the best possible profit when they had decided to sell.

A new excellent stadium and a winning team.

do you realy think DIC would have done the stadium to? i thought they were going to finance the old one?

[red g]

Do we have to choose?

for the sake of this poll you do !

[Imy]

Do we have to choose?

for the sake of this poll you do !

Thats why i haven't voted

[AFII]

do you realy think DIC would have done the stadium to? i thought they were going to finance the old one?

I think they would have scrapped the old stadium plans because it would drop the clubs sell on price.

[red g]

Thats why i haven't voted

[redwien]

I want number 19 and I'd happy if we got it playing in tin pot stadium.

[IanTatt]

should we have gone for shinawatra

I know he's a bit of a dodgy character, but he's willing to dig deep to the tune of £200mil for Sven, £48 spent already. And I'm sure he would have financed the stadium too, how would would that have made him look in his native Thailand, owning LFC. I think the two yanks have underestimated how much we need to spend to challenge for the EPL. They think that buying toress will guarantee loads of goals, what about his partner upfront and two talented wide men supplying him, that's going to cost and I don't think they will spend too much in the windeow or in the summer... Shinawatra is worth shed loads and can finance everything from his own pocket, rather than loans and stuff...

[Imy]

Interesting but No.

DIC were the ones.