New stadium update...

[Alpha]

Good news all round.

In the cold light of day, did anybody really want that over-the-top space-aged monstrousity anyway?

It wasn't very us, was it?

[Chris]

Makes that pathetic statement the other day by Parry all the more embarassing.

[Kaip]

Wonder what bollocks the doubters are gonna post about RS4 's info now on the other sites

[Imy]

Good news all round.

In the cold light of day, did anybody really want that over-the-top space-aged monstrousity anyway?

It wasn't very us, was it?

Yep, i rather that then Riverside, Emirates, Reebok, Walkers stadium, Kingston Communications Stadium etc etc generic, one design for all stadium.

Anfield is unique, so should the new stadium be.

[Guest]

That's what I call clearing any doubts about Rafa.

[sonsofthedesert]

Makes that pathetic statement the other day by Parry all the more embarassing.

IF you look at the statement on Saturday and don't read between the lines he did actually say this but without saying the new design had been scrapped. People were reading between the lines if they thought it said we were building the space age design.

[Dhav]

Good news all round.

In the cold light of day, did anybody really want that over-the-top space-aged monstrousity anyway?

It wasn't very us, was it?

I did. i thought it was very us - unique, distinctive, impressive. Certainly preferable to the original design indentikit stadium. Anyway it's all academic now.

I'm wondering if the 70,000 will be fixed maximum capacity for this stadium, or will it be expandable?

[sonsofthedesert]

Wonder what bollocks the doubters are gonna post about RS4 's info now on the other sites

It's going to hurt them, but I'm sure they will say Rushian said it first.

[Guest]

IF you look at the statement on Saturday and don't read between the lines he did actually say this but without saying the new design had been scrapped. People were reading between the lines if they thought it said we were building the space age design.

Now you're trying to justify the fact that you were wrong.

[tomasjj]

"The situation in the credit markets has not affected our design, programme, or implementation of building our new stadium. The priority has always been to build a winning team on the pitch and everything else we do is geared towards that."

Nice one Rick. Here is what you said a couple of days ago.

How can we trust you now?

[sonsofthedesert]

Now you're trying to justify the fact that you were wrong.

What?

Read my posts, I said on Saturday the statement meant we wouldn't build it.

[Rocket]

It's going to hurt them, but I'm sure they will say Rushian said it first.

rashid

[sonsofthedesert]

"The situation in the credit markets has not affected our design, programme, or implementation of building our new stadium. The priority has always been to build a winning team on the pitch and everything else we do is geared towards that."

Nice one Rick. Here is what you said a couple of days ago.

How can we trust you now?

All he siad was the credit crunch hasn't effected the design. He hasn't lied, they are saying the costs effected it, people assumed it meant the design wasn't changing.

[machiavelli]

Good news all round.

In the cold light of day, did anybody really want that over-the-top space-aged monstrousity anyway?

It wasn't very us, was it?

I quite liked it...What i did really like was the fact it was individual, unlike the the carbon copy previous design that we originally had. I feel this new design will not be an original design, but based on another football ground only slightly modified for the single tier Kop.

[Guest]

What?

Read my posts, I said on Saturday the statement meant we wouldn't build it.

I'm not referring to saturdays posts, but you jumping the gun as to say (weeks ago) that we were too rash to believe what was said in the papers. I think they fairly reflected the situation, no ?