Bascombe- Americans to sell up?

[Robster007]

I mean c'mon, he writes for NOTW, it doesn't get any lower than that for journalistic integrity.

I'm not sure i'd be too picky in terms of my choice of employer if it meant providing a wonderful life and more opportunity for my family, and clearly he's on more cash than he was at The Echo.

I can think of worse papers to work for, as can we all.

[dom9]

I'm not sure i'd be too picky in terms of my choice of employer if it meant providing a wonderful life and more opportunity for my family, and clearly he's on more cash than he was at The Echo.

I can think of worse papers to work for, as can we all.

The worst paper, that you refer to, is the sister publication of the NOTW.

[Jayesh87]

Did I say his article was complete bollocks?

No I didn't.

But let's be honest here, his piece contains sensationlist rhetric, of course it does, remeber the paper he writes for now.

And his recent track record is, well, laughable.

We've just beaten Pompey 4-1 at home after a ****e week and then this Judas cunt goes on about "potential catastrophe". It certainly gets the doom mongers, anti American xenophobes out in force.

Would love to talk about the match yesterday, but no we get this ****e instead.

Had enough of it. He **** off and do one.

Bascombe wouldnt have written the article if he 100% didnt believe it.

Its not like this is breaking news anyways, Inside Sport in one of the others papers broke the story a couple of weeks back.

[Guest]

I'm not sure i'd be too picky in terms of my choice of employer if it meant providing a wonderful life and more opportunity for my family, and clearly he's on more cash than he was at The Echo.

I can think of worse papers to work for, as can we all.

But even though he's not at the Echo, doesn't mean he does not have contacts with the club, the same ones he already had ? I'm prepared to give the guy the benefit of the doubt, purely because he's a Liverpool supporter.

[Robster007]

The usual over-reaction to a hacks story.

Over-reaction? I haven't seen an over-reaction. Before the selling of the club/takeover episode started, when was the last time you saw the sort of back pages about our club you see these days? It's not just Bascombe, and the people taking this out on Bascombe are wrong. Of all the journo's, he's the most likely to still have his contacts. IMO, of course.

[Robster007]

The worst paper, that you refer to, is the sister publication of the NOTW.

Brother/sister...... It has a different editor. Regardless, i'm aware of that and buy neither.

[CharlieMansonsSquint]

Bascombe wouldnt have written the article if he 100% didnt believe it.

Its not like this is breaking news anyways, Inside Sport in one of the others papers broke the story a couple of weeks back.

So he's plagiarised it then?

And if multiple sources report a story it's true then?

How do you explain: "Rafa to get the sack" then.

Absolutely fed up of all of this, fed up up of gullible cunts falling for it as well. That's the worst part of it.

[Robster007]

But even though he's not at the Echo, doesn't mean he does not have contacts with the club, the same ones he already had ? I'm prepared to give the guy the benefit of the doubt, purely because he's a Liverpool supporter.

[Guest]

So he's plagiarised it then?

And if multiple sources report a story it's true then?

How do you explain: "Rafa to get the sack" then.

Absolutely fed up of all of this, fed up up of gullible cunts falling for it as well. That's the worst part of it.

You're the one over reacting Niall.

[dom9]

Brother/sister...... It has a different editor. Regardless, i'm aware of that and buy neither.

There was a different editor in 1989 too.

[Robster007]

So he's plagiarised it then?

And if multiple sources report a story it's true then?

How do you explain: "Rafa to get the sack" then.

Absolutely fed up of all of this, fed up up of gullible cunts falling for it as well. That's the worst part of it.

What about concerned fans wondering why so many different people are reporting this stuff? What about the owners publicly admitting the stadium plans have been scaled down? And so on.........

[Robster007]

There was a different editor in 1989 too.

Look, don't turn this into a discussion about something else. You don't know me or where I was/how it affected me etc

[Johnny]

Over-reaction? I haven't seen an over-reaction. Before the selling of the club/takeover episode started, when was the last time you saw the sort of back pages about our club you see these days? It's not just Bascombe, and the people taking this out on Bascombe are wrong. Of all the journo's, he's the most likely to still have his contacts. IMO, of course.

Bascombe is no different to any other Journo.
All they are printing is speculation hoping to sell newspapers.When i see concrete proof that anything bascombe writes is going to happen then i`ll believe it.So far all I`ve read is speculation aimed at whipping fans into a frenzy.Which seems to be working.

[desertscouser]

at Bascombe.

He's continually clutching at straws by coming out with these sensationalist stories. I don't believe a word he writes anymore.

[Jayesh87]

So he's plagiarised it then?

And if multiple sources report a story it's true then?

How do you explain: "Rafa to get the sack" then.

Absolutely fed up of all of this, fed up up of gullible cunts falling for it as well. That's the worst part of it.

No need for personal insults.

TBH i think Rafa was bloody close to gettin sacked back then, who knows?

Im not saying its all true but i definatly think there is an element of truth in the articles.

Only time will tell.