LFC Vs Wigan Match Thread

[Shanks65]

Avram Grant is a nonce.

Agreed, but why?

[Dan]

Not a bad shout...

I'd like to see Kewell just behind Torres actually.

Pervert

I'd prefare it to be me

The boy's a bit special....

[CharlieMansonsSquint]

Agreed, but why?

Why not?

[kurtangle01]

Not a bad shout...

I'd like to see Kewell just behind Torres actually.

I guess we'll see but it's definitely an option.

As is a 4-3-3 with Kewell and Pennant wide of Torres.

[JohnDoe]

This is the formation I've been waiting for. Excellent.

[Neil Young]

Who gives a flying f*ck how the pundits (here and the paid "experts"" on telly) choose to describe the formation? 4-4-2, 4-5-1, 4-2-3-1, 4-2-2-1-1 - it really doesn't matter, it's just an abstraction.

It's about the result first and whether we play "well" (however you define that) second. Everything else - like how the players line up at the kick-off - is just over-analytical bollocks.

[Shanks65]

Why not?

He's a proper cock

[Red_Al_77]

Good team. Plenty of options.

[kurtangle01]

Who gives a flying f*ck how the pundits (here and the paid "experts"" on telly) choose to describe the formation? 4-4-2, 4-5-1, 4-2-3-1, 4-2-2-1-1 - it really doesn't matter, it's just an abstraction.

It's about the result first and whether we play "well" (however you define that) second. Everything else - like how the players line up at the kick-off - is just over-analytical bollocks.

Ehhhhh......Fair enough?

[Shanks65]

Who gives a flying f*ck how the pundits (here and the paid "experts"" on telly) choose to describe the formation? 4-4-2, 4-5-1, 4-2-3-1, 4-2-2-1-1 - it really doesn't matter, it's just an abstraction.

It's about the result first and whether we play "well" (however you define that) second. Everything else - like how the players line up at the kick-off - is just over-analytical bollocks.

Yep.

5 in midfield could actually be 3 upfront, depending on how well we're playing.

The players out there are more than capable of putting Wigan to bed.

[nbryan1764]

Who gives a flying f*ck how the pundits (here and the paid "experts"" on telly) choose to describe the formation? 4-4-2, 4-5-1, 4-2-3-1, 4-2-2-1-1 - it really doesn't matter, it's just an abstraction.

It's about the result first and whether we play "well" (however you define that) second. Everything else - like how the players line up at the kick-off - is just over-analytical bollocks.

**** me...sense at last from someone it comes to something when people are criticizing before a ball is kicked (and I realise it is only a select few but this post seemed to capture everything)!!!!

Well said that man

[NIred1]

I like the adaptability of the team and how the positions behind Torres are inter-changable. If those 3 can work together Wigan will be run ragged. Or so the idea goes

[Elvis]

Yep.

5 in midfield could actually be 3 upfront, depending on how well we're playing.

The players out there are more than capable of putting Wigan to bed.

The offal site has 4-4-2 with Gerrrard and Torres up front - for waht it's worth...

[Shanks65]

The offal site has 4-4-2 with Gerrrard and Torres up front - for waht it's worth...

I won't commit until I see what Andy gray says.

[Hot Carl]

This is the formation I've been waiting for. Excellent.

What formations do you think it is, John Doe? 4-2-3-1?