Bruce, you and your pie-eating team off misfit retarded rejects are about to get the hiding of your deformed miserable lives you big fat headed piece of flat-nosed useless ****.
Who gives a flying f*ck how the pundits (here and the paid "experts"" on telly) choose to describe the formation? 4-4-2, 4-5-1, 4-2-3-1, 4-2-2-1-1 - it really doesn't matter, it's just an abstraction.
It's about the result first and whether we play "well" (however you define that) second. Everything else - like how the players line up at the kick-off - is just over-analytical bollocks.
Heaven forbid we should discuss our team's formation on this forum
Bruce, you and your pie-eating team off misfit retarded rejects are about to get the hiding of your deformed miserable lives you big fat headed piece of flat-nosed useless ****.
Bruce, you and your pie-eating team off misfit retarded rejects are about to get the hiding of your deformed miserable lives you big fat headed piece of flat-nosed useless ****.
Heaven forbid we should discuss our team's formation on this forum
not a problem discussing it but it seems a little pointless before they have kicked a ball. If they play **** then rip into them but hey give them a chance to at least play **** first!
Who gives a flying f*ck how the pundits (here and the paid "experts"" on telly) choose to describe the formation? 4-4-2, 4-5-1, 4-2-3-1, 4-2-2-1-1 - it really doesn't matter, it's just an abstraction.
It's about the result first and whether we play "well" (however you define that) second. Everything else - like how the players line up at the kick-off - is just over-analytical bollocks.
Haha yes! Anyone would have thought we were playing netball and not football with all this rigid formation bollocks.
Comment