Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How to beat Chelski on Sunday..hear me out

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 3
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 3 template Next
    #1

    How to beat Chelski on Sunday..hear me out

    I went back to last years scrap book(i do a prem one every year, lovely innit) only to notice a couple things on how to beat the chavs.
    The first thing I noticed is how **** they are coming from behind.
    Last season they trailed after 45 minutes 6 times, from these they only WON 1, drew 1 and lost 4.
    They also conceded the 1st goal 10 times last season.
    From this they WON 4, drew 1 and LOST 5 so if Gerrard and the lads go out and blitz them in the first half with a goal, the chavs will stuggle to win.
    Same thing happened in the community shield, we scored first, they scored then we won the game 2-1. They could not score again.
    The second thing I noticed was how vulnearble they are playing against a 4-4-2 formation.
    THE REDS alongside Blackburn(pedersen) and Fulham(boa morte) did well against the chavs because they played the 4-4-2 system with 2 wingers.
    Chelski with their 4-3-3 formation cum 4-5-1 did not manage to do fook all against the more reliable 4-4-2 formation.
    If RAFA is reading this(yeh right ) then he should start with both Gonzalaz & Pennant who can are more than capable of skinning that lass Ashley & the ponce Ferriera on the wing.

    Thoughts ?
    18-5-7-8-3
    Tags: None
    #2
    My thought is that the more I read about Ashley the more I realise that I actually dislike him more than any other player which suprises me. I even have more time for Neville (urgh) for at least some loyalty to his club.

    I really hope Momo takes him down at waist level with enough force to knock him in to a few of the blackberry crowd.

    (Sorry, completely off topic)

    Comment

      #3
      Originally posted by REDSCOUSER
      I went back to last years scrap book

      Thoughts ?
      You still need to get a life!

      Comment

        #4
        Originally posted by REDSCOUSER
        Thoughts ?
        My thought is whoever we put out we're going to ****ing thump the ***** back into the dark ages

        I think the best approach is to stretch them laterally and I agree we should play Pennant out wide and bring SG back into the middle.
        Last edited by Red_Polo; 14-09-06, 05:32 PM.
        Like blood on iron

        Comment

          #5
          Originally posted by Arsonfire
          You still need to get a life!
          we have a comedian in da house
          :whatever:
          18-5-7-8-3

          Comment

            #6
            That's not a denial.
            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment

              #7
              Originally posted by REDSCOUSER
              we have a comedian in da house
              :whatever:
              Bragging again!!!.....I just have a cleaner once a week

              Comment

                #8
                I think the distinct problem with this is that we don't look like scoring early (never mind at all!). In fact, we don't seem to look interested until we concede or almost concede at the moment.

                Plus, although I see the purpose in your method, they have a better rate of coming from behind than most teams (40% of games won when coming from behind is quite good!)

                Comment

                  #9
                  Originally posted by NICKZS
                  I think the distinct problem with this is that we don't look like scoring early (never mind at all!). In fact, we don't seem to look interested until we concede or almost concede at the moment.

                  Plus, although I see the purpose in your method, they have a better rate of coming from behind than most teams (40% of games won when coming from behind is quite good!)
                  not arguing that 40% ain't bad, point is they do not adapt playing against 442formation with wingers, as for the REDS not scoring I think it's a wee blip 'till Kuyt/Bellamy get to know each others runs and moves..I'm not worried.
                  18-5-7-8-3

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Originally posted by REDSCOUSER
                    not arguing that 40% ain't bad, point is they do not adapt playing against 442formation with wingers, as for the REDS not scoring I think it's a wee blip 'till Kuyt/Bellamy get to know each others runs and moves..I'm not worried.
                    Not worried myself really, but to be completely realistic we need to stop stuttering at the start of every season (excuse the alliteration), as by the time we have seemed to find our groove we have an impossibly large deficit to make up.

                    Agree about the wingers point though. Accomodating so many central midfielders and 2 strikers in the squad is leaving them very narrow and, as long as our wingers perform, we could really hit them on Sunday. I will be very interested to see which formation Rafa plays, hopefully he'll be flying a Kuyt. He has impressed me no end since his arrival

                    Comment

                      #11
                      When was the last time we had a good start? We seem to have a **** start every single ****ing season.

                      Thinking about it, the best start if I remember rightly was at the start of the 2002/2003 season when we went 12 games unbeaten. We were top and in our 13th game lost at Boro (to a goal from ****ing Zenden, wasn't it?) and it was all downhill after that.
                      Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                      Comment

                        #12
                        Originally posted by REDSCOUSER
                        not arguing that 40% ain't bad, point is they do not adapt playing against 442formation with wingers, as for the REDS not scoring I think it's a wee blip 'till Kuyt/Bellamy get to know each others runs and moves..I'm not worried.
                        But they don't play 433 anymore!!!
                        The Crushing Machine MKII

                        Comment

                          #13
                          Originally posted by SpeedyG
                          But they don't play 433 anymore!!!
                          oh they do mr BOB SMITH sir
                          If you watch them, the formation switches from 4-5-1 to 4-3-3 during matches
                          18-5-7-8-3

                          Comment

                            #14
                            Play our strongest 11 from the off, score a couple -then bring on fresh legs after 60-70 mins. So that means Gerrard AND Xabi or Momo, witH Pennant AND Gonzalez, with Kuyt & Bellamy up front.

                            Comment

                              #15
                              Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso
                              When was the last time we had a good start? We seem to have a **** start every single ****ing season.

                              Thinking about it, the best start if I remember rightly was at the start of the 2002/2003 season when we went 12 games unbeaten. We were top and in our 13th game lost at Boro (to a goal from ****ing Zenden, wasn't it?) and it was all downhill after that.
                              The first of several Dudek clangers if memory serves me right. He went from an excellent keeper to an utter disaster in a matter of seconds.

                              Comment

                              Previous 1 2 3 template Next
                              Working...
                              X