Dubai International to make bid for Liverpool FC

[Dhav]

No way am I falling for that water squirting out of a flower thing again.

If he doesn't sign it, then he would probably get fired by G&H
If DIC subsequently takeover, they'll sack him anyway as they don't rate him.

If he wants to keep his job, he'll have to sign it.

This is the cruxt of it. i'd hope he'd put the club's interests before his own for once, but I have no confidence in him doing that

[Red Chilli]

what i thought,if he doesnt sign whats the point in sacking him though as theyl be selling up?
.

OK, they might not, but DIC will if they take over

[disco]

Even though he's a board member?

Wouldn't that require an EGM?

Why? To get a shareholder vote?!

"I vote my 18,000 shares, George how many do you vote?!"

Fair point though Chilli and Bas, logistically there's probably not time.

[baz87]

Parry wouldn't be kept on by DIC, even if reports that he and Al Ansari are friends, they'd ave no faith in his abilities as a CEO. If Parry has got the power to prevent this refinance going through, and he exercises that power, I think it is almost certian that it will end up costing him his job.

I know, he wouldn't risk it. However if there was some sort of deal between Parry and DIC then he may as without the refinance DIC hold all the cards regarding the takeover.

But i just can't see it happening.

[CharlieMansonsSquint]

What a ****ing idiot.

I clicked on that link to make sure it wasn't my incredulous "sack Rafa" thread from last week.

Thank **** for that.

[baz87]

Why? To get a shareholder vote?!

"I vote my 18,000 shares, George how many do you vote?!"

Fair point though Chilli and Bas, logistically there's probably not time.

I know im right

They wouldn't have any legal reason to sack him either.

[Red Chilli]

Why? To get a shareholder vote?!

"I vote my 18,000 shares, George how many do you vote?!"

Fair point though Chilli and Bas, logistically there's probably not time.

Well that's the thing isn't it? Gillett has been very quiet, Foster has fecked off, would Gillett automatically vote to sack Parry?
Maybe Gillett is facing a tough decision, maybe he wants out.

All speculation from me though

[disco]

I clicked on that link to make sure it wasn't my incredulous "sack Rafa" thread from last week.

Thank **** for that.

Well your's is just a well meaning, heat of the moment, **** up.

That cunt's just being an attention seeker. Even if he geniunely hates Rafa for footballing reasons, that's certainly NOT why he started that post. ****.

[baz87]

Well that's the thing isn't it? Gillett has been very quiet, Foster has fecked off, would Gillett automatically vote to sack Parry?
Maybe Gillett is facing a tough decision, maybe he wants out.

All speculation from me though

They both want out. The only reason for the refinance is to give them more time to negotiate a better deal. Without it they'd be forsed to agree to DIC's terms or lose out completely.

[disco]

I know im right

They wouldn't have any legal reason to sack him either.

They'd have to pay off his contract and replace him ****ing sharpish. Banks probably wouldn't accept it.

[CharlieMansonsSquint]

Well your's is just a well meaning, heat of the moment, **** up.

That cunt's just being an attention seeker. Even if he geniunely hates Rafa for footballing reasons, that's certainly NOT why he started that post. ****.

Yes, yes I agree.

I just wanted to clarify that me and Barney_Rubble aren't the same person.

[Dhav]

They both want out. The only reason for the refinance is to give them more time to negotiate a better deal. Without it they'd be forsed to agree to DIC's terms or lose out completely.

I hope the two money hungry cunts get royally ****ed by DIC. They've used our club as door mat.

[Red Chilli]

They'd have to pay off his contract and replace him ****ing sharpish. Banks probably wouldn't accept it.

Surely this kind of business practise is legally floored? You can't just sack board members to get a deal done can you?

[Alpha]

If he doesn't sign it, then he would probably get fired by G&H
If DIC subsequently takeover, they'll sack him anyway as they don't rate him.

If he wants to keep his job, he'll have to sign it.

Assuming Harris's story is true:

Even if refusing to sign ultimately cost Parry his job, surely DIC would make it worth his while? Not only could he be pivotal in the takeover, he could be pivotal in driving the price right down.

And if he does sign, how could Parry do his job anyway? As the Chief Exec, it isn't like he can shack up with Hicks and run the club from Dallas.

With almost unamimous opposition from the support, not even the slickest PR campaign can turn this around, can it?

[AFII]

Assuming Harris's story is true:

Even if refusing to sign ultimately cost Parry his job, surely DIC would make it worth his while? Not only could he be pivotal in the takeover, he could be pivotal in driving the price right down.

And if he does sign, how could Parry do his job anyway? As the Chief Exec, it isn't like he can shack up with Hicks and run the club from Dallas.

With almost unamimous opposition from the support, not even the slickest PR campaign can turn this around, can it?