DIC latest - the largely wild speculation thread

[redheart]

NOnsense.....nobody on this site or any other knows anything about any supposed takeover.

There is not one single credible fact to support any suggestion that there is, has been, or will be a takeover. FACT. The rest is wishful thinking.

As for DIC you cannot take silence as confirmation.

It could just be that they cannot be bothered to respond to every rumour. It could be that they are enjoying the publicity and annoying the Yanks after the disappointment of last year. Silence means nothing.

Until we have facts...just concentrate on the games

[kopdan]

lol

all this fighting on a website

you're all dics

[Skillz]

NOnsense.....nobody on this site or any other knows anything about any supposed takeover.

There is not one single credible fact to support any suggestion that there is, has been, or will be a takeover. FACT. The rest is wishful thinking.

As for DIC you cannot take silence as confirmation.

It could just be that they cannot be bothered to respond to every rumour. It could be that they are enjoying the publicity and annoying the Yanks after the disappointment of last year. Silence means nothing.

Until we have facts...just concentrate on the games

You are wrong, because the fact they have been silent, which is a fact supports the fact they are interested.

As far as them being successful and actually taking over I have no clue, but they are interested of that there is no doubt in my mind.

[AFII]

From Shankslegend on RAWK....

I heard a very indifferent news yesterday by my other source.

Firsly the yanks are aware DIC want to buy, contact has been made between both partys.

Hicks wasn't in Dubai at all he has been in USA, since returning from his holiday.

Both yanks are pushing ahead with the running of the club and planning for the future. Tom Hicks will be coming over to the club next week to show his face for whatever reason probably to do with the ground but not to watch a game.

The refinancing still has a few teething problems that need ironing out. Am unsure what all this means so just reporting what i have been told.

[Skillz]

From Shankslegend on RAWK....

I heard a very indifferent news yesterday by my other source.

Firsly the yanks are aware DIC want to buy, contact has been made between both partys.

Hicks wasn't in Dubai at all he has been in USA, since returning from his holiday.

Both yanks are pushing ahead with the running of the club and planning for the future. Tom Hicks will be coming over to the club next week to show his face for whatever reason probably to do with the ground but not to watch a game.

The refinancing still has a few teething problems that need ironing out. Am unsure what all this means so just reporting what i have been told.

As good as Shankslegend's source is normally I am starting to think he is a bit further away from solid on this one. just my thoughts.

[redheart]

You are wrong, because the fact they have been silent, which is a fact supports the fact they are interested.

As far as them being successful and actually taking over I have no clue, but they are interested of that there is no doubt in my mind.

Oh good lord. You don't even know what a fact is!

It is a fact that DIC has been silent.

It is NOT a fact that this means they are interested. It could mean anything. There are numerous interpretations of it. If that is the best you have to go on you really are clutching at straws.

"but they are interested of that there is no doubt in my mind"

THats the point though. You want it to be true. But you have no evidence. It is the very essence of wishful thinking.

We would all like some Liverpool fanatic sugar daddy to ride in and buy the club and give us money to compete etc etc....but it is not going to happen

[sonsofthedesert]

As good as Shankslegend's source is normally I am starting to think he is a bit further away from solid on this one. just my thoughts.

Saying that there is stuff to be sorted with the financing sounds garbage, they had to refinance the first week of Feb so I can't see this still not having been sorted. Also this is the same guy that went on the big I am when CTR had the audacity to say he had info.

[Skillz]

Oh good lord. You don't even know what a fact is!

It is a fact that DIC has been silent.

It is NOT a fact that this means they are interested. It could mean anything. There are numerous interpretations of it. If that is the best you have to go on you really are clutching at straws.

"but they are interested of that there is no doubt in my mind"

THats the point though. You want it to be true. But you have no evidence. It is the very essence of wishful thinking.

We would all like some Liverpool fanatic sugar daddy to ride in and buy the club and give us money to compete etc etc....but it is not going to happen

I have posted what I consider to be evidence. If you don't believe it, good for you because I for one could care less what you think. Fact is they are interested, whether they are successfull or not is another matter. The only reason they haven't said anything is to allow an easy retraction if they aren't successful.

As for sugar daddy's, I for one do not want one, but I find it strange that you admit you do

[Skillz]

Saying that there is stuff to be sorted with the financing sounds garbage, they had to refinance the first week of Feb so I can't see this still not having been sorted. Also this is the same guy that went on the big I am when CTR had the audacity to say he had info.

Shankslegend has a fantastic reptuation and thats great but I suspect his source is very close to Parry. Parry IMO would not be all that involved in negotaitions on this deal.

[sonsofthedesert]

Shankslegend has a fantastic reptuation and thats great but I suspect his source is very close to Parry. Parry IMO would not be all that involved in negotaitions on this deal.

He is the same guy that said that Parry had employed 2 of his sons at LFC, which is crap.

[redheart]

There is no evidence that they are interested. You do not know what evidence is and you clearly have no understanding of the concept of a fact.

"Fact is they are interested." You have not produce a single fact to demonstrate this.

There is NO evidence they are interested.

"The only reason they haven't said anything is to allow an easy retraction if they aren't successful."

Actually there could be lots of reasons. You have irrationally picked one (without any evidence).

Why do you want DIC to take control? Money. You like others thing they will spend huge amounts of money on the stadium and players etc. The very essence of a sugar daddy.

[redheart]

Shankslegend has a fantastic reptuation and thats great but I suspect his source is very close to Parry. Parry IMO would not be all that involved in negotaitions on this deal.

And your doing it again!

Your criticising another person based upon unfounded, and irrational belief.

You claim his souce is further away from solid and say this is just your thought.....but you have no evidence of this!

And you do the same above. You dont know who his source is yet you condemn him.

Why? His "stuff" real or otherwise doesn't fit with your irrational, almost delusional wishful thinking.

[Skillz]

There is no evidence that they are interested. You do not know what evidence is and you clearly have no understanding of the concept of a fact.

"Fact is they are interested." You have not produce a single fact to demonstrate this.

There is NO evidence they are interested.

"The only reason they haven't said anything is to allow an easy retraction if they aren't successful."

Actually there could be lots of reasons. You have irrationally picked one (without any evidence).

Why do you want DIC to take control? Money. You like others thing they will spend huge amounts of money on the stadium and players etc. The very essence of a sugar daddy.

And your doing it again!

Your criticising another person based upon unfounded, and irrational belief.

You claim his souce is further away from solid and say this is just your thought.....but you have no evidence of this!

And you do the same above. You dont know who his source is yet you condemn him.

Why? His "stuff" real or otherwise doesn't fit with your irrational, almost delusional wishful thinking.

Listen Redheart. Listen carefully.

The fact that DIC have been silent is proof to me that they have been hawking around the club. If they had no interest there is no chance they would allow their name to be used for 3 months or more as a pawn of the media.

IF you see the silence as something else, good for you. Now **** off cos I could not give rat's arse.

[sinbad]

There is no evidence that they are interested. You do not know what evidence is and you clearly have no understanding of the concept of a fact.

"Fact is they are interested." You have not produce a single fact to demonstrate this.

There is NO evidence they are interested.

"The only reason they haven't said anything is to allow an easy retraction if they aren't successful."

Actually there could be lots of reasons. You have irrationally picked one (without any evidence).

Why do you want DIC to take control? Money. You like others thing they will spend huge amounts of money on the stadium and players etc. The very essence of a sugar daddy.

You sound like a stuck record.

[pezzzer]

Listen Redheart. Listen carefully.

The fact that DIC have been silent is proof to me that they have been hawking around the club. If they had no interest there is no chance they would allow their name to be used for 3 months or more as a pawn of the media.

IF you see the silence as something else, good for you. Now **** off cos I could not give rat's arse.

if they wernt interested they would of said so. being liverpool fans they would not want to build up our hopes by letting the media spin out a story like this. for me, there silence (dd) is deafening