Originally posted by wishiwasascouser
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
DIC latest - the largely wild speculation thread
Collapse
X
-
if hicks used the term "fixing it" then for me that means getting someone to help him buy out gillet, someone who he wants to deal with or take a back seat and let him run the showOriginally posted by REDrascal View PostThe thought of Hicks in TOTAL control frightens me more. Surely Gillette wont sell 'to a buddy of Hicks, the option is for Hicks to buy not a mate. Hopefully Gillette has a new friend in the form of DIC.
it gets worse and worse
ps3 fanclub member#1
sony will win the console war.
Comment
-
OK, George W. steps down as president this year, he'll be looking for something to fill his time, and he's rich......................the words cat and pidgeon spring to mind.....steve prepares to sit back and watch the forum go mad.....someone will take it seriously!!Originally posted by REDrascal View PostI thought that, BUT, if that was the case why would he give all & sundry notice of the fact. Must be a bluff.
Comment
-
Bush sucks cockOriginally posted by Steve101 View PostOK, George W. steps down as president this year, he'll be looking for something to fill his time, and he's rich......................the words cat and pidgeon spring to mind.....steve prepares to sit back and watch the forum go mad.....someone will take it seriously!!
Comment
-
maybe DIC are talking to Hicks to agree on the sale of GG shares, I dont know.Originally posted by Sarb24 View PostYeah but why is he in talks with DIC? I don't understand that bit to be honest. He talks to DIC and at the same time comes out with this stuff.
Giving me a brain scramble manYNWA!!!!
Comment
-
Don't pay any attention to what Hicks has came out with. When he says Gillett requires his consent, all he's reffering to is that he has first refusal on his shares.
If Hicks can't/won't buy Gillett's shares (which he can't or won't) then he cannot stop Gillett selling to DIC. Also providing that DIC have the backing of Moores and Parry then even without selling any of his shares Hicks' will not have control as Parry, Moores and DIC would be able to out vote him.
Comment
-
Sounds like a case of bla bla, to me:whatever:"So I kind of have the ability to determine the outcome of what is going to happen, and I am right in the middle of that."
He added: "For a lot of reasons I can't discuss, I haven't been able to fix it yet. But I am preparing to be in a position to fix it."
Comment
-
Originally posted by baz87 View PostDon't pay any attention to what Hicks has came out with. When he says Gillett requires his consent, all he's reffering to is that he has first refusal on his shares.
If Hicks can't/won't buy Gillett's shares (which he can't or won't) then he cannot stop Gillett selling to DIC. Also providing that DIC have the backing of Moores and Parry then even without selling any of his shares Hicks' will not have control as Parry, Moores and DIC would be able to out vote him.
I dont think Parry and Moores will come into it. But the quote which worries me is the bit about fixing it. I hope Bascombe has more on this and Barrett tomoz cause The way i read it was he has a new partner.YNWA!!!!
Comment
RAFA
Comment