Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
When Parry and Moores step down I do hope, particularly for Moores, that they dont get a barracking. We are (in the main) classy fans so I really hope we dont **** that up.
"I just felt that the whole night, the conditions and taking everything into consideration and everything being equal, and everything is equal, we should have got something from the game - but we didn't." - JOHN BARNES
what warrants moores stay???...we regressed under him and he caused this entire fiasco
Just History, I agree he's not the greatest businessman, many many mistakes. But he's Liverpool through & through. He did bring us Rafa, for that i thank him dearly. But yes, there are many reasons for him to go, starting with your 2 above. Big Reasons too.
That's handy, now we know Ansari's e-mail address we can contact him and get the 49% thing explained.
Yes, I am surprised they didnt block that part out. Its so blurry though that I cant even make it out to be honest. Hopefully people wont pester him with daft emails. Coops you d-bag I am referring to you here
Yes, I am surprised they didnt block that part out. Its so blurry though that I cant even make it out to be honest. Hopefully people wont pester him with daft emails. Coops you d-bag I am referring to you here
Maybe it's clearer in the paper. Think I'll pop down to the newsagent.
Is the fact that they have taken over the debt of the club, does that mean that they are the real owners of the club ??
All the debt that Tom and George created - now is held by DIC. Surely this means that they own the club - because they can collect on the debt at anytime (theoretically) and therefore kick out Hicks - or am I being too simplistic ?
Is the fact that they have taken over the debt of the club, does that mean that they are the real owners of the club ??
All the debt that Tom and George created - now is held by DIC. Surely this means that they own the club - because they can collect on the debt at anytime (theoretically) and therefore kick out Hicks - or am I being too simplistic ?
I think DIC are, or are soon to be, our new owners in all but name. I think financially Hicks now reaslises he's gonna have to concede to DIC's greater financial muscle and it's now become a matter of exiting with ego intact. He might have agreed to sell if the allow him to supervise the stadium etc.
I have one word to offer - honesty. I couldn't be devious if I tried. Joe Fagan.
Comment