Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

DIC latest - the largely wild speculation thread

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Rafa Shankly View Post
    over the years

    care to mention what weve been arguing about among ourselves all these years?

    and i hate to say it mate but when RTK quote a percentag im sure their talking about the number of people who get off their arse and attend meetings rather than the internet community.

    plus the straw polls the echo and daily pot held would be good indications as to how the majority of fans feel.
    OK, since you asked. Lets talk websites first. Go on almost any LFC site and you can find posts slagging off another one (yes even here). The obvious one is KT, but thats Dunks fault. I used to go on YNWA, and wasnt well recieved ,being an 'outsider', and plenty of others have running fueds.

    Supporters clubs. We used to have a supporters club, now we have god knows how many, all because the club took over the 'official' one and people stropped.
    We have these current organizations, all vying for your attention and claiming to represent us all. And dont give me all this guff about straw polls, read up on stats before hailing them as the truth. Reclaim the kop??? Who for exactly?I'll tell you who, people who want thier own little domain, thats who. people from thier own chosen clique, who sing at the right time and chant when told. Have you ever heard anything so stupid as having orchestrated PLANNED singalongs. The kops tradition was built on spontanaety, not **** like this.

    And then we have Hillsborough. I didnt want to mention this as its very sensitive for many of us, but its the same. two (at least) groups fighting the same cause but, im afraid to say, not getting on, lets leave it at that.

    See? a history of bickering, we just cant help ourselves.

    Comment


      I am absolutely stunned by Gilletts silence in all this. He is the ****er responsible for bringing Hicks to the table and should explain WTF is really going on.
      "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

      Comment


        Originally posted by Lecter View Post
        So tell me why did Hicks lie about meeting Klinsmann

        Why on the day he owned up to that did he deny trying to sell 15% to DIC

        Lets ignore the numerous lies between then and last week and pick up when Hicks stated early last week that he had "never met DIC nor do I have any intention of meeting with them to discuss the sale of any stake in LFC" on ly to then send a letter thanking them for the previous meetings and requesting a further one

        Gillett might be the problem financially he might be the reason the debt has been forced on the club (bearing in mind they both have a history of leveraged buy-outs I find it highly unlikely this has been forced on them) but Gillett hasnt been the one telling lies and getting caught lying thats solely down to Hicks
        It's all so obvious the lies he's told, as you say his denial that talks were on going or even that he intended to hold talks with Dic, He hoped that if he didn't get his way with the deal, he could continue the lie to the fans, and his assertion that he never had any intention of selling.

        It now seems he's decided his next course of action is to discredit Gillette in any way possible, shifting any blame he can, telling us Klinsman was a Gillette idea, although he had already come out & said it was the right thing to do as they thought Rafa might leave, was it not Hicks who accused Rafa publicly of Pouting.

        Comment


          Originally posted by looprevil View Post
          I am absolutely stunned by Gilletts silence in all this. He is the ****er responsible for bringing Hicks to the table and should explain WTF is really going on.
          completly agree mate, he's silence is quite disconcerting
          Justice for the 96

          Comment


            if the model is Man u then lfc with 650mill debt versus man u with 800 mill both earning similar sums since we now have a huge stadium and have improved our marketing etc to push us into the top 5 clubs in terms of income then are we not in a very healthy financial and footballing state? is that not exactly what we wanted moores to sell us for?
            Man U don't need to pay off ?% of revenue from the stadium. They are only paying the interest from the loan against the club, nothing more.

            We will have to pay the interest from the loan against the club, around £30m/year plus ?% of the revenue from the new stadium and that will only come into effect when the stadium is built.

            So we will be in a much worse situation than Man U.
            Just believe and you never know what will happen.

            According to Benitez it's important not simply to go out to win but to go out prepared to win, which means players have to put in the same level of work on a daily basis. Anything else is unacceptable.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Rafa Shankly View Post
              over the years

              care to mention what weve been arguing about among ourselves all these years?

              and i hate to say it mate but when RTK quote a percentag im sure their talking about the number of people who get off their arse and attend meetings rather than the internet community.

              plus the straw polls the echo and daily pot held would be good indications as to how the majority of fans feel.

              I think you might be getting the quote confused if you are referring to this

              Les Lawson, secretary of the Liverpool Supporters' Association, said: "As far as I'm concerned, there is no way Hicks and Gillett are going to win back the trust of the 5% (i.e RTK) of intimidating, xenophobic and generally myopic supporters."


              The % and general insult was added to the end of the piece by Speedy G

              Les Lawson was making the point that he feels Hicks will never win back the trust of supporters.

              Speedy was making the point that many fellow supporters are intimidating, xenephobic and myopic for not being pro-Hicks.

              Comment


                Originally posted by cadmium View Post
                completly agree mate, he's silence is quite disconcerting
                He is probaby bound by confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements at the moment. This will no doubt be a condition imposed by Hicks, DIC or both of them

                Comment


                  Originally posted by m100900 View Post
                  Speedy was making the point that many fellow supporters are intimidating, xenephobic and myopic for not being pro-Hicks.

                  No, Speedy G was making the point that a lot of people seem to have a problem with Americans in general, and the insults like redneck cunt and yank **** fly thick and fast on this site. Got nothing to do with being pro-hicks, more to do with the fact that a lot of people on these boards are listerene.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by looprevil View Post
                    I am absolutely stunned by Gilletts silence in all this. He is the ****er responsible for bringing Hicks to the table and should explain WTF is really going on.


                    Bizarre for a man with other sporting 'franchises' that require a positive public profile, and no doubt many private assets that could use a positive business profile, to allow himself to look like a submissive pussy who's been slapped down and told to shut it.

                    At the moment he's still 50%, but Hicks is ridiculing his position in very blunt terms ??

                    Can only hope he turns out to be the wise silent type who lets his deal making do the talking, but I doubt it.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by scratch View Post
                      No, Speedy G was making the point that a lot of people seem to have a problem with Americans in general, and the insults like redneck cunt and yank **** fly thick and fast on this site. Got nothing to do with being pro-hicks, more to do with the fact that a lot of people on these boards are listerene.
                      Well, if that kind of xenophobia exists on this site, fair enough, valid point Although Speedy was referring to RTK rather than Est.

                      But that doesn't cover myopic - I think the pro-Hicks point stands.

                      people are listerene ? Whats that mean ?

                      Comment


                        Originally posted by m100900 View Post


                        Bizarre for a man with other sporting 'franchises' that require a positive public profile, and no doubt many private assets that could use a positive business profile, to allow himself to look like a submissive pussy who's been slapped down and told to shut it.

                        At the moment he's still 50%, but Hicks is ridiculing his position in very blunt terms ??

                        Can only hope he turns out to be the wise silent type who lets his deal making do the talking, but I doubt it.
                        You know what, I think he may well be. Just thinking back to when they took over I had never heard anything from Gillett about his initial failed attempt to buy the club.

                        Time will tell.
                        "Its not about the long ball or the short ball, its about the right ball." Bob Paisley

                        Comment


                          Myopic...is that short-sighted? I can never remember.

                          Listerene is an anti-septic...a septic tank is rhyming slang for yank...therefore anti-septic is anti-american...so thereby making listerene mean anti-american. Blame Stephen Fry for polluting my mind with that one.

                          Comment


                            Myopic = shortsighted.

                            Not wanting to labour the point, but if Speedy is sensitive to xenophobic name throwing like 'redneck cunt', he could maybe avoid constantly referring to Stavely as 'the bitch', if unnecessary insults is the issue.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by m100900 View Post
                              Myopic = shortsighted.

                              Not wanting to labour the point, but if Speedy is sensitive to xenophobic name throwing like 'redneck cunt', he could maybe avoid constantly referring to Stavely as 'the bitch', if unnecessary insults is the issue.
                              Fair enough, calling her a bitch was uncalled for, but that's not him being xenophobic, that's just his inane mysogynistic tendencies coming out, and he rightly got shot down for it.

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by AFII View Post
                                Man U don't need to pay off ?% of revenue from the stadium. They are only paying the interest from the loan against the club, nothing more.

                                We will have to pay the interest from the loan against the club, around £30m/year plus ?% of the revenue from the new stadium and that will only come into effect when the stadium is built.

                                So we will be in a much worse situation than Man U.

                                but they pay interest on the 800 mill to buy the club whilst we pay interest on 650 mill to buy the club + the stadium. so we'll be in a similar situation with around 150mill less debt no? am i missing something?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X