Just one question

[redwien]

If their keeper hadnt have had the game of his life and we'd have won 3-1 or 4-1 or 5-1 or whatever would it still be Rafa's **** tactics, **** substitutions, Rafa's lost it ......

I'm not a member of the Rafa is **** or the RCDNW brigade but this is ****ing terrible post. The fact is we lost to a side our youth team should be ****ting on and in season we thought we would be challenging for the title we are actualy challenging Everton for fourth place. All is not right.

[redwien]

So I can't criticise Rafa cos I don't do as much as him. It's blind loyalty fools like you that will keep this club in the dark ages. When Rafa goes in the summer you can grieve for a battle for 4th place that you love so much.

:whatever:

[Nic83]

If their keeper hadnt have had the game of his life and we'd have won 3-1 or 4-1 or 5-1 or whatever would it still be Rafa's **** tactics, **** substitutions, Rafa's lost it ......

It would have still been a poor choice not to have Torres on the bench just in case yes. Torres was fit enough.

Other mistakes he made such as leaving Gerrard on the bench for too long and taking off our best player in Babel wouldn't be relevant if we were trouncing them. I don't necessarily disagree with Gerrard not starting but I'd have prefered if he did.

Starting Itandge was a mistake and would have been regardless of the result. In fact, signing Itandge fullstop was a mistake.

so to answer your question, it probably wouldn't have been the same on here because people wouldn't have been arsed but it had every right to be the same as the mistakes were all still there, plain as day. And it's the same every week - basic error after basic error.

[dww]

So what = if you were around then no doubt you would say "shanks is a cunt and needs the sack".

Thats so what.

To be fair to DJS that particular phrasiology is all Sydney Vicious's.