Originally posted by rage
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Benitez - the master tactician
Collapse
X
-
Guest
What the **** are you on about again ? You don't spare underhand digs isn't it ? Joint top of the league with 4 wins out of 5 and a win against Marseilles in midweek + unbeaten in all competitions. Are you preparing the terrain for you when we'll get beaten ? Then you'll come out with your bull**** about how right you were. Cretin.Originally posted by rage View Posti recall crouch coming on too late in a certain champions league final and zenden being on the pitch. if he's a genius he's flawed by his favoritism of certain players.
Comment
-
Guest
There's 3 posters in here, maybe 4 who are complete tools and with each posts make ridicule of themselves. They still can't work out why though and think they have the voice of reason or some sort of enlightenment that we don't have.Originally posted by Woobus View PostLol so you use one match to attack Rafa with instead of looking at the bigger picture? No one will doubt he doesnt get his subs right all the time, but clearly he does more often than most managers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Woobus View PostLol so you use one match to attack Rafa with instead of looking at the bigger picture? No one will doubt he doesnt get his subs right all the time, but clearly he does more often than most managers.what is this tag team?Originally posted by fredo View PostWhat the **** are you on about again ? You don't spare underhand digs isn't it ? Joint top of the league with 4 wins out of 5 and a win against Marseilles in midweek + unbeaten in all competitions. Are you preparing the terrain for you when we'll get beaten ? Then you'll come out with your bull**** about how right you were. Cretin.
people were giving examples of games past to demonstrate rafa's genius, selective memory doesn't wash with me. i'm happy to agree with woobus' reasoned response but you fredo are a class 1 brown nosed cock sucker. I made a point about a champions league final and rafa's preferential treatment of certain players, debate with me on that by all means but make personal attacks on me and i will respond likewise.
Comment
-
It's called delusion.Originally posted by fredo View PostThere's 3 posters in here, maybe 4 who are complete tools and with each posts make ridicule of themselves. They still can't work out why though and think they have the voice of reason or some sort of enlightenment that we don't have.
The act of deluding : the state of being deluded = something that is falsely or delusively believed or propagated = a persistent false psychotic belief regarding the self or persons or objects outside the self that is maintained despite indisputable evidence to the contrary .
...........
Last edited by Vermilion; 20-09-08, 10:25 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by fredo View PostThere's 3 posters in here, maybe 4 who are complete tools and with each posts make ridicule of themselves. They still can't work out why though and think they have the voice of reason or some sort of enlightenment that we don't have.
So true.Nah. He won't win the Prem. You can quote me on that. - Sarb24
Comment
-
Guest
Cock sucker ? I bet you'll like it when I suck yours.Originally posted by rage View Postwhat is this tag team?
people were giving examples of games past to demonstrate rafa's genius, selective memory doesn't wash with me. i'm happy to agree with woobus' reasoned response but you fredo are a class 1 brown nosed cock sucker. I made a point about a champions league final and rafa's preferential treatment of certain players, debate with me on that by all means but make personal attacks on me and i will respond likewise.
As for sucking Rafa's cock, far from it. It's about being rational. What the **** is this preferential treatment bit ? Rafa is only concerned about the team and you are boasting out that some players don't deserve to be playing. Who gives a flying **** when we are top of the league.
I'm sure you'd like us to be mid table to emphasize the righteousness of your argument. Again, this is the reasoning of a grade A tool, never mind other adjectives I can throw at you.
Debate with reason and rationality and I'll respect your posts. You've had an agenda with Kuyt since day one; objected against the signing of Riera and Barry and even had doubts about signing Robbie Keane. I can understand that you don't rate some players but your ****ing vinyl is just scratched and needs servicing or replacing altogether.
Anyway, if you keep on spouting as much site about how ****e we are and how Rafa's tactics or preferential treatment of players are detrimental to the team, this could happen by the law of averages. You'll probably be laughing when this happens. You'll also think you're a genius.
Comment
-
anyway the entire article is flawed when comparing with shankley and paisley. i'm sure back then we had pretty much one sub on the bench rather than 5 or 7 or whatever it is and the squads were far smaller. but hey why let details like that get in the way of legitimising blind faith.
rafa is an excellent tactician at times but to call him genius - not just yet imo and definitely not by comparing him through the use of subs with managers that did not have the options on the bench that he has.
Comment
-
Guest
You're the genius out there. Don't take this away from you.Originally posted by rage View Postanyway the entire article is flawed when comparing with shankley and paisley. i'm sure back then we had pretty much one sub on the bench rather than 5 or 7 or whatever it is and the squads were far smaller. but hey why let details like that get in the way of legitimising blind faith.
rafa is an excellent tactician at times but to call him genius - not just yet imo and definitely not by comparing him through the use of subs with managers that did not have the options on the bench that he has.
Comment
-
where is this a thread about being top of the league you deluded twit?Originally posted by fredo View PostCock sucker ? I bet you'll like it when I suck yours.
As for sucking Rafa's cock, far from it. It's about being rational. What the **** is this preferential treatment bit ? Rafa is only concerned about the team and you are boasting out that some players don't deserve to be playing. Who gives a flying **** when we are top of the league.
I'm sure you'd like us to be mid table to emphasize the righteousness of your argument. Again, this is the reasoning of a grade A tool, never mind other adjectives I can throw at you.
Debate with reason and rationality and I'll respect your posts. You've had an agenda with Kuyt since day one; objected against the signing of Riera and Barry and even had doubts about signing Robbie Keane. I can understand that you don't rate some players but your ****ing vinyl is just scratched and needs servicing or replacing altogether.
Anyway, if you keep on spouting as much site about how ****e we are and how Rafa's tactics or preferential treatment of players are detrimental to the team, this could happen by the law of averages. You'll probably be laughing when this happens. You'll also think you're a genius.
keep it in the context of the thread what specifically about my initial point did you disagree with?
Comment
-
Originally posted by fredo View PostCock sucker ? I bet you'll like it when I suck yours.
As for sucking Rafa's cock, far from it. It's about being rational. What the **** is this preferential treatment bit ? Rafa is only concerned about the team and you are boasting out that some players don't deserve to be playing. Who gives a flying **** when we are top of the league.
I'm sure you'd like us to be mid table to emphasize the righteousness of your argument. Again, this is the reasoning of a grade A tool, never mind other adjectives I can throw at you.
Debate with reason and rationality and I'll respect your posts. You've had an agenda with Kuyt since day one; objected against the signing of Riera and Barry and even had doubts about signing Robbie Keane. I can understand that you don't rate some players but your ****ing vinyl is just scratched and needs servicing or replacing altogether.
Anyway, if you keep on spouting as much site about how ****e we are and how Rafa's tactics or preferential treatment of players are detrimental to the team, this could happen by the law of averages. You'll probably be laughing when this happens. You'll also think you're a genius.
Great rant. Needed to be said but.
If we go through a bad spell, god forbid, these "negative nancy's" will go OTT and hopefully find themselves banned
.
Will be no loss to me though.Nah. He won't win the Prem. You can quote me on that. - Sarb24
Comment
-
Guest
Again, you show your undoubted genius.Originally posted by rage View Postwhere is this a thread about being top of the league you deluded twit?
keep it in the context of the thread what specifically about my initial point did you disagree with?
The thread is about a journalist saying that Rafa is a tactical genius. Could this not be remotely related to being top of the league or for making decisions in a match which made us win them and thus gaining 3 points ?
Now don't tell me I don't discuss things with you and that I attack you. Come back with more arguments such as the one above and I'll continue.
Comment
-
This is where your reasoning falls down....it was the same for every manager in the old days as it's the same for every manager in todays game, Shanks, Paisley and co had the same amount of subs as the teams they competed with....as does Rafa today, it's how they use them not how many they have. imo.Originally posted by rage View Postanyway the entire article is flawed when comparing with shankley and paisley. i'm sure back then we had pretty much one sub on the bench rather than 5 or 7 or whatever it is and the squads were far smaller. but hey why let details like that get in the way of legitimising blind faith.
rafa is an excellent tactician at times but to call him genius - not just yet imo and definitely not by comparing him through the use of subs with managers that did not have the options on the bench that he has.
To be fair.....you really can't compare managers from different eras on their performances in their respective times in charge...it's impossible.
Anyway i don't want a debate about it...........

............. 
Last edited by Vermilion; 20-09-08, 10:49 AM.
Comment
-
Guest
Come gather 'round people
Wherever you roam
And admit that the waters
Around you have grown
And accept it that soon
You'll be drenched to the bone.
If your time to you
Is worth savin'
Then you better start swimmin'
Or you'll sink like a stone
For the times they are a-changin'.
Come writers and critics
Who prophesize with your pen
And keep your eyes wide
The chance won't come again
And don't speak too soon
For the wheel's still in spin
And there's no tellin' who
That it's namin'.
For the loser now
Will be later to win
For the times they are a-changin'.
Come senators, congressmen
Please heed the call
Don't stand in the doorway
Don't block up the hall
For he that gets hurt
Will be he who has stalled
There's a battle outside
And it is ragin'.
It'll soon shake your windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'.
Come mothers and fathers
Throughout the land
And don't criticize
What you can't understand
Your sons and your daughters
Are beyond your command
Your old road is
Rapidly agin'.
Please get out of the new one
If you can't lend your hand
For the times they are a-changin'.
The line it is drawn
The curse it is cast
The slow one now
Will later be fast
As the present now
Will later be past
The order is
Rapidly fadin'.
And the first one now
Will later be last
For the times they are a-changin'.
Comment
Comment