Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Celtic vs Liverpool Legends (C5)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #46
    Originally posted by Bob
    Excellent post!

    Obviously the great players of the past would have adapted, but its fundamentally a whole different ball game so to speak.
    bob your huge intellectual analystic brain is going to explode. Just lower yerself to our level and pick one, gerrard or souness

    Comment


      #47
      Originally posted by paulcooper4
      bob your huge intellectual analystic brain is going to explode. Just lower yerself to our level and pick one, gerrard or souness
      Gerrard.

      Bobbies

      ...
      Don't take life too seriously or you'll never get out alive.

      Comment


        #48
        Originally posted by Bob
        Gerrard.

        Bobbies

        Comment


          #49
          souness

          Comment


            #50
            Originally posted by Morphorino
            I would have liked to have seen teams of 60's, 70's and 80's for myself, because as the game evolves, it's a style of football that will never be seen again, and I'm sure most people would argue that it was a better game to watch all those years ago.
            I'm 83 you know.
            What are all you people doing in my house?
            Screaming from beneath the waves...

            Comment


              #51
              Souness. If you could put Souness in his prime up against Gerrard - Souness would own him - one way or another

              Also, I wonder what Gerrard's shot's would be like with the heavier ball?

              Comment


                #52
                Originally posted by Tom
                Souness. If you could put Souness in his prime up against Gerrard - Souness would own him - one way or another

                Also, I wonder what Gerrard's shot's would be like with the heavier ball?

                I bet he'd hurt himself
                I live with Steptoe.

                Comment


                  #53
                  Things were much better in the old days. We used to live in a cardboard box and eat gravel

                  Comment


                    #54
                    Originally posted by Tom
                    Things were much better in the old days. We used to live in a cardboard box and eat gravel
                    you lived in the posh part then mate

                    Comment


                      #55
                      Originally posted by BobTheCharmer
                      couldn't agree more. I think football is less enjoyable now than at any other point in history. The ball should in theory be in play longer without the back pass rule, but due to a combination of lighter balls/poor control it spends half the match in the stand.

                      The players we used to have were clever players when it came to the game of football. Knowing where & how to run seems basic but these milionnaires we have struggle with even that.
                      Good point about the balls. I don't think players these days have worse control, they have less time though.

                      But these balls that dip and swerve all over the place, it makes goalkeeping a lottery and rewards talentless no-marks like Lampard shooting from all angles because the ball will do the work and bamboozle the goalie.

                      Anyway I don't really like goals scored from long shots. Kuyt's goal against Newcastle was a better goal for me than Alonso's (though Xabi's was exciting). It was classic Liverpool, a few passes, a defence-splitting pass from Alonso, first-time cross, finish, 1-0. Like the good old days in some ways (though more an Aldridge goal than Rush).
                      .
                      Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                      May the Lord bless this post.

                      Comment


                        #56
                        Originally posted by Neil Young
                        Like the good old days in some ways (though more an Aldridge goal than Rush).
                        Yeah - Rushie would have put it through Robinson's legs

                        Comment


                          #57


                          My dominant memory of Rushie's goals is him running on to Dalglish through balls while Aldridge fed off low crosses (sweeping them in like Kuyt did) and I associate Keegan's goals with Toshack knock-downs. In my mind each has a distinct style of goalscoring though of course they all got plenty of goals in other ways.
                          .
                          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                          May the Lord bless this post.

                          Comment


                            #58
                            Originally posted by Neil Young


                            My dominant memory of Rushie's goals is him running on to Dalglish through balls while Aldridge fed off low crosses (sweeping them in like Kuyt did) and I associate Keegan's goals with Toshack knock-downs. In my mind each has a distinct style of goalscoring though of course they all got plenty of goals in other ways.
                            This is very true. I always think of rushies goals in that way too, even though I can vividly remember him hitting them in from short range/long range, headers/volleys, either foot, tap-ins and spectacular.

                            Comment


                              #59
                              Originally posted by paulcooper4
                              This is very true. I always think of rushies goals in that way too, even though I can vividly remember him hitting them in from short range/long range, headers/volleys, either foot, tap-ins and spectacular.
                              Anyone remember that Rushie hat-trick on a cold Friday night against Villa. Goals with his right and left foot (including a Van Basten like volley) and a header. World class.

                              What we need is another Welsh goal machine up front for us

                              Comment


                                #60
                                Originally posted by Neil Young


                                My dominant memory of Rushie's goals is him running on to Dalglish through balls while Aldridge fed off low crosses (sweeping them in like Kuyt did) and I associate Keegan's goals with Toshack knock-downs. In my mind each has a distinct style of goalscoring though of course they all got plenty of goals in other ways.
                                That would have been when we played away from home. We used to play on the break, with Dalglish the lynchpin in midfield who would thread a ball through to rush on or around the halfway line. His pace did the rest.

                                At home we just used to camp outside the oppositions penalty area, keeping prossesion and looking for the probing pass.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X