Why does anybody bother to vote 'undecided?'
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post. -
It would seem that this poll is somewhat moot. It's blidingly obvious really what top players think about City, but Torres today confirmed his views when commenting on stories that Iker Casillas of Real Madrid turned down a reported £12m a year to join City, saying " Big players like Iker will always be at the best clubs and City are not one of them".
Case closedComment
-
Comment
-
-
I think that sort of transfer money will ultimately cost Mark Hughes his job.
Comment
-
No way.Never sell your best players if you have genuine ambitions.-----------------------------------------------
'Football is a simple game based on the giving and taking of passes, of controlling the ball and of making yourself available to receive a pass. It is terribly simple.'
Bill Shankly.Comment
-
absolutely noy. Every player we'd then go after would double in price as teams would know we had a load of cash, plus Nando is irreplaceableJustice for the 96Comment
-
The question posed was whether "you" would sell Torres, not whether Torres would go.Originally posted by Redspin View PostSubstance > StyleComment
-
But we can't focus on the positive. That's just wrong. We must look for the negative in every situation. Hey Sarb?Originally posted by Parm View PostComment
-
Funnily enough had a dream last night that Torres was sold to City for 159M£. Rafa was gutted but said that the club couldn't turn the bid down.
Made me think what how big the offer would have to be for us to consider/accept it?Forbes knows best... FACTComment
Comment