Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ablett calls for league restructuring

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Ablett calls for league restructuring

    Steve Hunter 24 February 2009 [liverpoolfc.tv]
    Gary Ablett has called for a restructuring of the Barclays Premier Reserve League because of the lack of games for his young squad.
    With the current format consisting of just 20 teams in the league, the second string don't play again in the league until March 12, when they entertain Manchester United.

    During Ablett's days as a youngster in the reserve team at Anfield, the reserves used to play a 34-game season.

    With over 40 players used so far this term, Ablett claims more games are essential for the development of his squad.

    "We worked it out that, including the mini-derby, we would only play three games in around 63 days, which is just ridiculous," Ablett told Liverpoolfc.tv.

    "We want to see our young boys progress and to do that they need to play as much football as they can with us.

    "A lack of games has really hindered our progress. I know we have had a few postponements but that's because of the weather which you can't do anything about.

    "They need to look at the format of the league. Why not give us 30 games instead of 20, which would make such a big difference?

    "The whole reserve structure needs looking at in a massive way. We need to get together with the Premier League and look at this and try to put it right."

    Ablett insists the other clubs in the reserve league have similar views, adding: "I think we all share the same concerns.

    "I know the first team is the most important thing and Academy football is also very well looked after in terms of their games per season programme, but I think there is a massive chunk missing in terms of boys aged 18 to 22 who are too old to play Academy football but aren't quite ready to progress to the first team.

    "They need to play competitive games in order to progress. We played 18 competitive matches last season in eight months and now this campaign it has been extended to 20, but that just isn't good enough.

    "We have tried to organise some friendly games but it's not always easy because clubs don't want their players getting injured.

    "We also play regular games at Melwood when we divide into two teams and bring some boys in from the Academy to have a look at them.

    "That still doesn't compare to playing competitive games and testing the lads out against another club in a different environment at a higher level.

    "I am trying to give a chance to some of Hughie McAuley's under-18 squad in the reserve side but there are just not enough games."

    Ablett's side are still in the Liverpool Senior Cup and travel to Formby tonight in their quarter-final tie. Kick-off at Altcar Road is at 7.45pm GMT and the tie has to be decided on the night with extra-time and penalties if necessary.

    "The plan was to use a couple of boys from Hughie's team against Formby, but we won't do that now because they will be playing in the FA Youth Cup quarter-final against Bolton Wanderers at Anfield on Friday," he added.

    "Formby will be a difficult game and a test for our lads against a competitive team in a different environment to what they are used to."
    "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
    -- William Blake

    #2
    totally agree with Ablet and I assume Rafa. It is ridiculous
    Bill shankly to Tommy Smith after he'd turned up for training with a bandaged knee:
    'Take that poof bandage off, and what do you mean YOUR knee, it's LIVERPOOL'S knee !'

    "Sorry, boss, I should have kept my legs together," said Lawrence. "No, Tommy, your mother should have kept her legs together!," replied Shankly.

    * After Tommy Lawrence had let in a fluke goal between his legs

    Comment


      #3
      Agreed.

      40 players used so far this season is a ridiculous number though, I can't see how anybody benefits from that.

      Even being sent out on loan doesn't solve all the problems as you lose out on the A-grade coaching.

      Comment


        #4
        They should play if they are stuck with teams, each team four times, twice at home and twice away like the old SPL.

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by dww View Post
          With the current format consisting of just 20 teams in the league,


          "They need to look at the format of the league. Why not give us 30 games instead of 20, which would make such a big difference?
          Ok, is it 20 teams in the league...or 38 games home and away??

          Or 20 games in the season??

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by Scratch View Post
            Ok, is it 20 teams in the league...or 38 games home and away??

            Or 20 games in the season??
            Think that's an error, 20 games in the season.

            Comment


              #7
              That's an error, its 20 games in the season not 20 teams. There are 11 teams, its split into North and South now.
              Last edited by ElRobbie; 24-02-09, 01:47 PM.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by Joe King View Post
                They should play if they are stuck with teams, each team four times, twice at home and twice away like the old SPL.
                Agreed.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by bazza76 View Post
                  totally agree with Ablet and I assume Rafa. It is ridiculous
                  Seems like the SPL is considering a request by Celtic to put their reserve team in the 3rd division

                  http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/foot..._1/7905786.stm

                  I know it is something Rafa has advocated in the past but was shot down. With lower league clubs struggling for revenue, maybe it would not be such a bad idea for clubs with huge squads like LFC to place their reserves in the lower leagues - this should attract better gates for the clubs and a better standard and more regular games for the ressies.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    If I remember rightly the idea to have the ressies playing in the lower leagues was shot down by almost everybody.

                    It would be the perfect scenario for the top clubs i.e fringe players/youngsters playing regular competitive football whilst retaining access to top class coaching but I'm not sure how it would benefit the current league clubs.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by Matt View Post
                      If I remember rightly the idea to have the ressies playing in the lower leagues was shot down by almost everybody.

                      It would be the perfect scenario for the top clubs i.e fringe players/youngsters playing regular competitive football whilst retaining access to top class coaching but I'm not sure how it would benefit the current league clubs.
                      Shot down in the sense that it'll never happen and that in a wider context of other clubs in this country it is probably a bad idea. The fact is that lower league football in this country is as well watched as many nations top leagues and the clubs have a lot of history and loyal fans. While it would be ideal for us it would be a real shame for the game as a whole and the footballing heritage of the country.

                      Maybe we could have a team in the lower leagues of Scottish football
                      "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                      -- William Blake

                      Comment


                        #12
                        I think the most viable solution is, as already said, for teams to play each other 4 times instead of two.

                        Perhaps the larger clubs should make better use of their links with lower division sides and send a handful of players on loan each season. A member of the coaching staff could be seconded to the club to work with all the players and other coaches at the club.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          There are to many 'professional leagues' in England, players in the bottom 2 divisions get paid on average £500-£600 a week, clogging up the system, getting nowhere then ****ting themselves at 35 whaen they have to get a proper job.
                          There is so much wrong with football in this country it's a joke. Supporters 'support' their team so if that team was part time playing at the same level the same amount of fans would still turn up.
                          Our system rewards mediocracy.

                          Sorry gone slightly off track there
                          The King was back for a short while. Long live The King.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Originally posted by dww View Post
                            Shot down in the sense that it'll never happen and that in a wider context of other clubs in this country it is probably a bad idea. The fact is that lower league football in this country is as well watched as many nations top leagues and the clubs have a lot of history and loyal fans. While it would be ideal for us it would be a real shame for the game as a whole and the footballing heritage of the country.

                            Maybe we could have a team in the lower leagues of Scottish football
                            The Scottish Premier would be about the right level.
                            .
                            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                            May the Lord bless this post.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              Originally posted by The Birdman View Post
                              There are to many 'professional leagues' in England, players in the bottom 2 divisions get paid on average £500-£600 a week, clogging up the system, getting nowhere then ****ting themselves at 35 whaen they have to get a proper job.
                              There is so much wrong with football in this country it's a joke. Supporters 'support' their team so if that team was part time playing at the same level the same amount of fans would still turn up.
                              Our system rewards mediocracy.

                              Sorry gone slightly off track there
                              The system is not set up to develop anything though is it. No one is happy with their team being a feeder or development team at any level of the football league. The change in attendance at lower league grounds caused by differing off pitch factors and feeling of hope and even relegation battles are in my experience pretty big. I really don't think that devaluing the product by making people part time and not allowing clubs freedom would be the right thing to do.

                              I would agree that the fact that clubs keep big playing staffs often of older players has it's down side but I think any changes have to be to encourage development of players (i.e. CL style matchday squad restrictions or young player quotas).
                              "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                              -- William Blake

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X