Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

No new Liverpool stadium until recession ends

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #76
    Liverpool co-owner Tom Hicks has vowed that the club will build a new stadium – but has said that the move will not be financed by the £450million he is set to bank from the sale of baseball club Texas Rangers.

    Hicks and business partner George Gillett have been unable to raise the £500m it will cost to fund the development of a 60,000-capacity home for the Reds at Stanley Park because of the credit crunch.

    There have been reports in the United States that Hicks has now entered into negotiations with six potential buyers for the Rangers – and that Liverpool will benefit from the windfall.

    But Hicks said: “Rangers and Liverpool are totally separate investments, so there is no connection.


    “I do plan to keep a significant participation in the Rangers. We are close to winning our division. I want to finish what we have started.

    “Liverpool will obtain stadium financing when the financial market opens back up. We have all of our permits and will be ready when the market is ready.”

    Liverpool’s new managing director Christian Purslow admitted last week that the club hope to have the stadium completed in time for 2018 – should England’s World Cup bid be successful.

    That is six years behind the original schedule set when Hicks and Gillett bought Liverpool three years ago.

    The American pair have been criticised for failing to provide the finance for the stadium and for manager Rafa Benitez to build a championship-winning team.

    But Purslow’s portfolio is to develop new commercial streams – and he is in talks with several interested companies about a £15m-a-year kit sponsorship deal.

    Hicks added: “Christian Purslow is working hard. Liverpool’s new management focus is producing great new commercial results that will become known in due time.”

    Comment


      #77
      Originally posted by Bender View Post
      Liverpool co-owner Tom Hicks has vowed that the club will build a new stadium – but has said that the move will not be financed by the £450million he is set to bank from the sale of baseball club Texas Rangers.

      Hicks and business partner George Gillett have been unable to raise the £500m it will cost to fund the development of a 60,000-capacity home for the Reds at Stanley Park because of the credit crunch.

      There have been reports in the United States that Hicks has now entered into negotiations with six potential buyers for the Rangers – and that Liverpool will benefit from the windfall.

      But Hicks said: “Rangers and Liverpool are totally separate investments, so there is no connection.


      “I do plan to keep a significant participation in the Rangers. We are close to winning our division. I want to finish what we have started.

      “Liverpool will obtain stadium financing when the financial market opens back up. We have all of our permits and will be ready when the market is ready.”

      Liverpool’s new managing director Christian Purslow admitted last week that the club hope to have the stadium completed in time for 2018 – should England’s World Cup bid be successful.

      That is six years behind the original schedule set when Hicks and Gillett bought Liverpool three years ago.

      The American pair have been criticised for failing to provide the finance for the stadium and for manager Rafa Benitez to build a championship-winning team.

      But Purslow’s portfolio is to develop new commercial streams – and he is in talks with several interested companies about a £15m-a-year kit sponsorship deal.

      Hicks added: “Christian Purslow is working hard. Liverpool’s new management focus is producing great new commercial results that will become known in due time.”
      I don't believe a word these guys say until I see it happen.

      "If Gerrard continues to play up front, leaving this lack of creativity and intelligence in Midfield, the season WILL be over by Xmas."

      I still don't think we'll finish in the top 4 this season."

      FatTony 24/08/09

      Comment


        #78
        See I pretty much believe that that is their intention. I'm not sure though that the quotes there are a good thing. Basically despite the conditions imposed by RBS he won't be paying down any of the debt used to purchase the club and will gamble on a/ getting a good rate on the loan for the stadium and b/ increasing revenue to pay the even larger interest payments in the mean time.
        "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
        -- William Blake

        Comment


          #79
          yeah but surely this cant go on indefinately as at some point the loan will have to be paid, as the more rafa's transfer budget is cut, the more likely we'll drop out of the champions league spots and you can kiss anymore sponsorship goodbye.
          I know the banks are greedy but their not totally idiotic........scratch that but unlike american franchise, more successful equals more money with bigger name players which can only attract more sponsorship to the club. A bigger stadium means more cash too(after the loan for it is brought down to a manageable level or cleared) , like am i getting this all wrong??

          Comment


            #80
            Originally posted by spanky View Post
            yeah but surely this cant go on indefinately as at some point the loan will have to be paid, as the more rafa's transfer budget is cut, the more likely we'll drop out of the champions league spots and you can kiss anymore sponsorship goodbye.
            I know the banks are greedy but their not totally idiotic........scratch that but unlike american franchise, more successful equals more money with bigger name players which can only attract more sponsorship to the club. A bigger stadium means more cash too(after the loan for it is brought down to a manageable level or cleared) , like am i getting this all wrong??
            I think they fell that investment in youth plus Rafa being able to do business for a budget will see us keep in the CL spots. I don't think we can rely on the latter indefinitely but I'm not sure that G&H are that great judges of football.

            I suspect the sponsorship deals will be set up long term so that we will have as steady an income for the next few years as is possible. I think the real question becomes will Rafa be able to reinvest any windfalls he generates from exceptional on pitch performance - i.e. winning the league or will that go into repaying debts.

            If they do repay the debts I see no reason why they would change the business model and not just take whacking profits rather than put the money into players.

            I don't believe G&H are the satanic monsters some portray but at the same time I really don't think they are good for the club long term.
            "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
            -- William Blake

            Comment


              #81
              ...
              Brandt - Keita - Van Dijk - Sessegnon

              Comment


                #82
                Originally posted by Bender View Post
                Liverpool co-owner Tom Hicks has vowed that the club will build a new stadium – but has said that the move will not be financed by the £450million he is set to bank from the sale of baseball club Texas Rangers.

                Hicks and business partner George Gillett have been unable to raise the £500m it will cost to fund the development of a 60,000-capacity home for the Reds at Stanley Park because of the credit crunch.

                There have been reports in the United States that Hicks has now entered into negotiations with six potential buyers for the Rangers – and that Liverpool will benefit from the windfall.
                [B]
                But Hicks said: “Rangers and Liverpool are totally separate investments, so there is no connection.[/B


                “I do plan to keep a significant participation in the Rangers. We are close to winning our division. I want to finish what we have started.

                “Liverpool will obtain stadium financing when the financial market opens back up. We have all of our permits and will be ready when the market is ready.”

                Liverpool’s new managing director Christian Purslow admitted last week that the club hope to have the stadium completed in time for 2018 – should England’s World Cup bid be successful.

                That is six years behind the original schedule set when Hicks and Gillett bought Liverpool three years ago.

                The American pair have been criticised for failing to provide the finance for the stadium and for manager Rafa Benitez to build a championship-winning team.

                But Purslow’s portfolio is to develop new commercial streams – and he is in talks with several interested companies about a £15m-a-year kit sponsorship deal.

                Hicks added: “Christian Purslow is working hard. Liverpool’s new management focus is producing great new commercial results that will become known in due time.”

                Translation:

                Tom Hicks: "why the **** shall I put any of my own money into LFC"
                Brandt - Keita - Van Dijk - Sessegnon

                Comment


                  #83
                  Originally posted by cream View Post
                  ...
                  ...---...

                  Comment


                    #84
                    Originally posted by peekay View Post
                    Year after year the fans find scapegoats for our lack of success over the last 19 years. The main reason for the sustained underperformance is in our boardroom. We have been run like a freaking cornershop for the last twenty years. When things are rotten at the top, it tends to trickle down to the playing side of things.
                    No vision, no guts, no balls, pathetic execution.One wrong decision after the other. The only good thing they have done is bring in a manager who now has the ability to cover their ineptitude.
                    During our successful years we were the ideal model for how a football club should be run.
                    2018 eh, 20 years after the first plans were made, if it every happens.

                    I apologize for being a bit melodramatic in this post. All the articles made me sick.
                    Saddens me to say it but that is pretty much spot on.
                    Nah. He won't win the Prem. You can quote me on that. - Sarb24

                    Comment


                      #85
                      I personally think the two cunts will be dead long before we get a new stadium.
                      Brandt - Keita - Van Dijk - Sessegnon

                      Comment


                        #86
                        They won't invest a serious amount of their own cash to build a new stadium as they need to keep they're assets in a fairly liquid state to cover loans etc. With this in mind, I'd rather stay at Anfield than be saddled with more debt.

                        Comment


                          #87
                          Originally posted by ashey View Post
                          They won't invest a serious amount of their own cash to build a new stadium as they need to keep they're assets in a fairly liquid state to cover loans etc. With this in mind, I'd rather stay at Anfield than be saddled with more debt.
                          I agree Ashley - I wonder, just thinking aloud here........Has it ever been an option to perhaps develop the main stand? I done the stadium tour during the summer, to be brutally honest - i was a bit surprised at the state of the dressing rooms etc - it was all a bit " 1980's " if you ask me.

                          Maybe with a scaled down investment the capacity may be increased to closer to 55,000 or perhaps with a three teir option closer to the 60,000 ?

                          Maybe, inner city planning restrictions come into play here......have i just answered my own question?
                          DALGLISH !! :respect

                          klopptastic !

                          Comment


                            #88
                            Originally posted by Deano View Post
                            The big money is in the individual TV rights if/when it happens which is what most investors are probably looking at
                            .
                            absolutely spot on mate, and that is the only reason the yanks bought the club.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X