Hicks & Gillett denied access to Anfield

[cream]

So you have someone lined up to replace 'em?

If that's the case then my opinion of SOS will be drastically changed and I'll be full of respect for them

I wouldn't mind someone coming in who could move the club forward, but thats just me being greedy.

[The Birdman]

SOS are a bunch of ****wit cunts in my opinion and I'm ****ing fed up with the fact they claim to represent me (a Liverpool FC supporter) when I disagree with pratically everything about them.

Can anybody tell me 1 decent thing they have done that has made a difference??

Right up there with fat geordies standing on bins outside the training ground as far as rip offs go.

[powerpack]

Hear Hear Gazmo,

Could somebody please show me some lovely green grass on the other side?

There is no other side - period.

SOS are a bunch of clowns, the yanks aren't the best owners, but who is??

That's our lot - play the hand we are dealt, get on with it.

Stopping the owners from being in the director's box been seen as a moral victory? What a joke.

I bet if Shankly had've been about today, he would have gave this quango group a mouthful and told them to wise the **** up.

**** this, i'm going to bed.............

Ha ha, couldn't agree more

[RedsFan83]

SOS are a bunch of ****wit cunts in my opinion and I'm ****ing fed up with the fact they claim to represent me (a Liverpool FC supporter) when I disagree with pratically everything about them.

Can anybody tell me 1 decent thing they have done that has made a difference??

Right up there with fat geordies standing on bins outside the training ground as far as rip offs go.

Stopped the idiotic mosiac planned for the Fiorentina match, for a start.

[Guest]

Stopped the idiotic mosiac planned for the Fiorentina match, for a start.

Which they probably created in the first place, only to feel it was inappropriate at the last minute.

[Exiled_red]

I really don't like the owners but it's a close one between the them and SOS as to who are the most embarrasing to our club

[cream]

I really don't like the owners but it's a close one between the them and SOS as to who are the most embarrasing to our club

For me its the Yanks, with SOS not far behind.

[EwarWoo]

Their ultimate aim is supporter ownership.

Sorry mate, lost it a bit there.

I wouldn't mind someone coming in who could move the club forward, but thats just me being greedy.

Not quite as catchy as yanks out but at least it's calling for a move forward rather than a move nowhere, something we can all agree with.

[BillobShaisley]

Their ultimate aim is supporter ownership.

Their ultimate aim is to have the fans pay for them to run the club. Just like the yanks. Luckily our yanks aren't arsey ******s enough to cut off their own noses to spite their faces so wont ruin their investment to piss off a bunch of irrelevant chavs and pikeys.

As for hopes of getting good owners in...never going to happen! Get over it, that part of our history is gone due to the whinging **** generation of cunts that forced Moores out. No premiership club is cheap enough to be run as a social enterprise, nobody is going to spend 3,4,500mil of their own money to become a social landlord. We've made our bed now we have to lie in it!

[The Glove]

Stopped the idiotic mosiac planned for the Fiorentina match, for a start.

What was the mosaic?



For me, the things SoS most need to be careful about, is how attractive they are making the club look to future investors.

At some point the Yanks will sell. The question is who will come in. Whoever comes in will now know what they have to deal with if things dont go how the SoS want them.

If I had multi millions and wanted to buy LFC then Id want to run it how I saw fit, but thats not going to be the case is it because Id have to run it how they saw fit in order to not get the marches/protests/threats etc.

They need to think outside the box and paint a better picture of how bad things are and yet make it look attractive cos as it stands, they may well be scaring off potential investors.

[Leyton388]

If the owners wanted too they could heap a **** load of pressure on SOS and turn a lot of fans and people against them (not like they need any help dong that). All they have to do is start a campaign by which they start pointing the finger at SOS for the reason we have no investment.

All they just have to say that the constant harassment by groups such as SOS has scared investors off.

[MrMichael]

I really think we have terrible owners.

However, football has become massive business, and that means most clubs are no longer going to be run by people who aren't trying to make money out of it. You can't have some local millionaire who loves the club anymore, you're going to get either someone who is mega rich using the club as a play thing, or far more likely someone who wants to become mega rich out of it. Our lot are nothing different in that second group to the Glaziers at ManU and countless others, not least whoever the hell owns Portsmouth these days. And almost certainly whoever the hell might take us over.

I'd still like to see the back of Hicks and Gillett, but although I think a lot of people involved in SOS have the best of intentions, I fear they're holding on to some near-impossible ideals. And their methods are becoming counter-productive.

[PTP]

I really think we have terrible owners.

However, football has become massive business, and that means most clubs are no longer going to be run by people who aren't trying to make money out of it. You can't have some local millionaire who loves the club anymore, you're going to get either someone who is mega rich using the club as a play thing, or far more likely someone who wants to become mega rich out of it. Our lot are nothing different in that second group to the Glaziers at ManU and countless others, not least whoever the hell owns Portsmouth these days. And almost certainly whoever the hell might take us over.

I'd still like to see the back of Hicks and Gillett, but although I think a lot of people involved in SOS have the best of intentions, I fear they're holding on to some near-impossible ideals. And their methods are becoming counter-productive.

- agree, unless there is a scouse, season ticket holder who is a billionaire, they we are never going to get what we want - and even if there was, there would still be a group of people who would complain about them for some reason or other.

Now i do think the yanks have really ****ed up our club - and i don't know what the answer is, or who i would want - but blocking the current owners access to the ground causing the police to intervine is not a triumph for anyone

[The Glove]

There is only one answer and thats to stop the income.

Until the yanks get hit hard in the pockets, then they are never shifting.

Boycott the shop, boycott pre season friendlies, boycott using Thomas Cooks official travel packages. That kinda thing. Anything that comes into the club, boycott.

People will never stop going the game but they might be able to think before buying another replica shirt or a programme or even a pie. It all adds up.

[Kenneth]

There is only one answer and thats to stop the income.

Until the yanks get hit hard in the pockets, then they are never shifting.

Boycott the shop, boycott pre season friendlies, boycott using Thomas Cooks official travel packages. That kinda thing. Anything that comes into the club, boycott.

People will never stop going the game but they might be able to think before buying another replica shirt or a programme or even a pie. It all adds up.

Yep, all adds up to lower revenue and then lower expendature. Great plan.