Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is Broughton an Idiot?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    I think you are being unfair. The way these things tend to work is that the parties that express an interest that is seen to be legitimate, serious and credible are given access to the books and records so that they can study the possible acquisition more closely. They are not compelled to proceed of course, nor are they compelled to offer a price that is acceptable, but they tend not to change their position significantly unless they (a) uncover something unexpected or (b) suffer a change in circumstances. Broughton and BarCap will have made sure that there is nothing unexpected to uncover.

    Broughton ghas made it clear that several paprties have in effect shown a serious interest. He also knows what the timetable would normally be for completion. That is why he has said what he has.

    Knowing how therse things work and how a man like him cannot afford to misrepresent the position, I actually drew huge comfort from what he said, because it was far more explicit than I had expected.

    The fact that he is a chelsea fan is an irrelevance. He is a professional and will not want to damage his reputation.

    Comment


      #17
      Discussions and Negotiations take place before actual Bids are made. I would ask whether the opening poster is an idiot?

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by -V- View Post
        Discussions and Negotiations take place before actual Bids are made. I would ask whether the opening poster is an idiot?
        Nuke the thread.

        Comment


          #19
          Originally posted by Paul12 View Post
          I think you are being unfair. The way these things tend to work is that the parties that express an interest that is seen to be legitimate, serious and credible are given access to the books and records so that they can study the possible acquisition more closely. They are not compelled to proceed of course, nor are they compelled to offer a price that is acceptable, but they tend not to change their position significantly unless they (a) uncover something unexpected or (b) suffer a change in circumstances. Broughton and BarCap will have made sure that there is nothing unexpected to uncover.

          Broughton ghas made it clear that several paprties have in effect shown a serious interest. He also knows what the timetable would normally be for completion. That is why he has said what he has.

          Knowing how therse things work and how a man like him cannot afford to misrepresent the position, I actually drew huge comfort from what he said, because it was far more explicit than I had expected.

          The fact that he is a chelsea fan is an irrelevance. He is a professional and will not want to damage his reputation.
          Totally agree. People questioning Broughton don't really understand the rules of engagement in business. He's done very little wrong in my opinion (apart from sanctioning Rafa's departure) and made some very encouraging noises in his interview on the offal.

          Come on, he thinks a sale is feasible by 31st August - **** this transfer window it was the next ten I was worried about. Gives me great comfort, his comments.
          Really?

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by Paul12 View Post
            I think you are being unfair. The way these things tend to work is that the parties that express an interest that is seen to be legitimate, serious and credible are given access to the books and records so that they can study the possible acquisition more closely. They are not compelled to proceed of course, nor are they compelled to offer a price that is acceptable, but they tend not to change their position significantly unless they (a) uncover something unexpected or (b) suffer a change in circumstances. Broughton and BarCap will have made sure that there is nothing unexpected to uncover.

            Broughton ghas made it clear that several paprties have in effect shown a serious interest. He also knows what the timetable would normally be for completion. That is why he has said what he has.

            Knowing how therse things work and how a man like him cannot afford to misrepresent the position, I actually drew huge comfort from what he said, because it was far more explicit than I had expected.

            The fact that he is a chelsea fan is an irrelevance. He is a professional and will not want to damage his reputation.
            Good post, A breath of fresh air on here.

            I watched the press conference and got the same opinion. Broughton is a professional with integrity.

            Comment


              #21
              F*ck, Liverpool supporters putting their faith in a bloke that made his reputation selling cancer sticks.

              .
              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



              May the Lord bless this post.

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                F*ck, Liverpool supporters putting their faith in a bloke that made his reputation selling cancer sticks.

                'putting their faith in a bloke....' bit emotive isn't it?
                Trey Nyoni: countdown to stardom- 2 years 1year 0.5 years

                Comment


                  #23
                  I like cancer sticks.
                  I love Sarah

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                    F*ck, Liverpool supporters putting their faith in a bloke that made his reputation selling cancer sticks.

                    What the **** does it have to do with football and being a Chairman?

                    It's like saying "Don't trust Rafa, he took his missus by surprise once".
                    Really?

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                      F*ck, Liverpool supporters putting their faith in a bloke that made his reputation selling cancer sticks.
                      Cheers, I didn't know he had that association, I see him in a whole new light now.

                      Broughton

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Originally posted by red g View Post
                        can see why this goes about Purslow.....but broughton?
                        It was just a maybe but then it wasn't that long ago that Purslow was the good guy. Don't know who to trust

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by Tatterdemalion View Post
                          What the **** does it have to do with football and being a Chairman?

                          It's like saying "Don't trust Rafa, he took his missus by surprise once".
                          Classic ..Honest mistake Love ...no?
                          Anybody who criticizes Klopp ever is a James Blunt. Nov 2015
                          #****CITY

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by Tatterdemalion View Post
                            What the **** does it have to do with football and being a Chairman?

                            It's like saying "Don't trust Rafa, he took his missus by surprise once".
                            No it isn't.
                            .
                            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                            May the Lord bless this post.

                            Comment


                              #29
                              Originally posted by Chrono View Post
                              It was just a maybe but then it wasn't that long ago that Purslow was the good guy. Don't know who to trust


                              Precisely the point. I think some people have mistaken acumen for integrity.
                              Last edited by Neil Young; 03-07-10, 09:37 AM. Reason: It's better not to accuse fellow posters of being "Big Business fanbois"
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment


                                #30
                                What's a fanbois? Is it pronounced fong-bwa? Is this the whole French thing annoying you again?
                                Felching ≠ Gerbilling

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X