Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Would you sack Hodgson?

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 23
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 8 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 template Next
    #256
    Originally posted by PeteBest View Post
    Then you're defacto supporting the board because they made the decision to sack Rafa and appoint a puppet.
    A puppet?

    So, no matter who they'd appointed, you would have the same view?

    Give over, you're just gutted cos Rafa left.

    Comment

      #257
      Originally posted by PeteBest View Post
      Why would you '100% back' someone who's been appointed by people who are serving the interests of the owners? You've got to love the sheep mentality of certain Liverpool supporters.
      Who else is going to appoint someone? He left a perfectly good job because he wanted to join us and win things.

      How is supporting your team and current manager being a sheep? What do you propose? We boycott the club completely and shun the manager until the board are gone. Jesus Christ.

      Comment

        #258
        Originally posted by Chrono View Post
        Who else is going to appoint someone? He left a perfectly good job because he wanted to join us and win things.

        How is supporting your team and current manager being a sheep? What do you propose? We boycott the club completely and shun the manager until the board are gone. Jesus Christ.
        It's clear that we should only be supporting the manager 50%.

        Comment

          #259
          Originally posted by Reece View Post
          It's clear that we should only be supporting the manager 50%.
          So you 50% support the board? You make me sick!

          Comment

            #260
            We should appoint a puppy.
            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment

              #261
              Originally posted by PeteBest View Post
              Why would you '100% back' someone who's been appointed by people who are serving the interests of the owners? You've got to love the sheep mentality of certain Liverpool supporters.
              FFS, go and learn Italian, then find yourself an Inter forum to bore everyone on.
              Oh I don't know.

              Comment

                #262
                Originally posted by PeteBest View Post
                Then you're defacto supporting the board because they made the decision to sack Rafa and appoint a puppet.
                so you supported the new board last year and the year before and you supported the Americanss for the last 3 years as they have kept Rafa.

                So Basically the only reason you dont like the board is becuase they sacked Rafa and I presume they would have got your 100% support if rafa was in job?

                jeez man, you have serious Rafa-itis.
                _____________________________________

                Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

                Think we have the answer..Slot!!

                Comment

                  #263
                  Originally posted by Chrono View Post
                  So you 50% support the board? You make me sick!


                  I don't see how you can support the manager by percentages. Is it to do with the loudness of your voice when you sing his name? Or the quality of the paper you use to print a photo out of him for carrying in a picture frame around bars?

                  Clearly not everyone is particularly enthused by his appointment (myself included), but at this moment in time, before a ball has even been kicked under his reign, we should all be supporting him.

                  Comment

                    #264
                    Originally posted by Reece View Post


                    I don't see how you can support the manager by percentages. Is it to do with the loudness of your voice when you sing his name? Or the quality of the paper you use to print a photo out of him for carrying in a picture frame around bars?

                    Clearly not everyone is particularly enthused by his appointment (myself included), but at this moment in time, before a ball has even been kicked under his reign, we should all be supporting him.
                    Its easy. Fredo measures it by a complex calculation of how many wanks he has a day over Rafa and how long they take.

                    Today he loves Rafa 74.7% so far.
                    _____________________________________

                    Weak willed, Wank or do they have a masterplan?

                    Think we have the answer..Slot!!

                    Comment

                      #265
                      Originally posted by Reece View Post


                      I don't see how you can support the manager by percentages. Is it to do with the loudness of your voice when you sing his name? Or the quality of the paper you use to print a photo out of him for carrying in a picture frame around bars?

                      Clearly not everyone is particularly enthused by his appointment (myself included), but at this moment in time, before a ball has even been kicked under his reign, we should all be supporting him.
                      I think most people on here follow your sentiments - not overwhelmed by him being appointed but it is what it is and therefore we support him!

                      Comment

                        #266
                        Originally posted by red g View Post
                        Its easy. Fredo measures it by a complex calculation of how many wanks he has a day over Rafa and how long they take.

                        Today he loves Rafa 74.7% so far.

                        Comment

                          #267
                          Originally posted by ram9 View Post
                          FFS, go
                          .
                          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                          May the Lord bless this post.

                          Comment

                            #268
                            Originally posted by Neil Young View Post


                            WTF? ram9?
                            Oh I don't know.

                            Comment

                              #269
                              Originally posted by dom9 View Post


                              WTF? ram9?
                              I can see I overestimated ewe.
                              .
                              Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                              May the Lord bless this post.

                              Comment

                                #270
                                Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                                I can see I overestimated ewe.
                                Your joke was really baaaaad to be fair.

                                Comment

                                Previous 1 8 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 template Next
                                Working...
                                X