I'm no fan of Insua, but we should at the very least have had a recall option on his loan deal. I don't care if he wanted to leave, or if he was off on a free at the end of the season.
I said when we got rid of Emiliano I'd consider keeping him as second choice, I don't know if he'd have been happy with that since he is close to being a regular for Argentina, but needs must surely?
I am convinced that Roy is refusing to play Agger LCB because with Aurelio and Konchesky suspect injury wise he knows if he puts Agger LCB he would keep having to break up his CB partnership due to needing him at LB.
We should have just kept Insua, Aurelio and also bought Konchesky (or another LB).
I said when we got rid of Emiliano I'd consider keeping him as second choice, I don't know if he'd have been happy with that since he is close to being a regular for Argentina, but needs must surely?
I am convinced that Roy is refusing to play Agger LCB because with Aurelio and Konchesky suspect injury wise he knows if he puts Agger LCB he would keep having to break up his CB partnership due to needing him at LB.
We should have just kept Insua, Aurelio and also bought Konchesky (or another LB).
I could not agree more. None of those made any sense then and even less now.





Comment