Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Utd - Liverpool post match

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SimonNo7
    replied
    Originally posted by Frenchie View Post
    The club has turned a profit on players yes they were replaced with assets of lesser quality..that is stripping..so to follow your argument then it is fine to sell Gerrard Torres and Reina and replace them with dozy dick and harry

    As for managers being professional hahahaha Hodgson couldnt believe his luck when he was offered the job at his age and standing of course he took it knowing he would have to do as he was told...
    Hang on, where are the assets of lesser quality? As I said Poulsen for Mascha yes but nowhere else can I see assets of lesser quality, ie Cole for Benny, I think we got an much more valuable asset there!

    To be honest I always thought asset stripping was selling off profitable areas and not replacing them at all.

    Your last comment I shouldn't even respond but basically you are saying that managers are not professional... ok. Perhaps Rafa couldn't believe his luck when Inter came calling and he took it knowing he would have to do as he was told...

    Leave a comment:


  • Tatterdemalion
    replied
    Originally posted by Frenchie View Post

    They can't sell it so what do LBO professionals do? Sell off the more valuable assets and hope that increased revenue streams (new TV deal) will be in place so that net present value (NPV) of the club shows a sufficient profit on their personal liens to the club.

    Originally posted by Tatterdemalion View Post
    To begin with you don't make a profit on lien. That's ****ing collateral

    And as for 'educashun', well let's leave that one - I'm very well educated thank you.
    Originally posted by Frenchie View Post
    the profit on Lien is simply explained to someone of your stature.

    The KopCayman account that has loaned funds to LFC at 10% over Libor is in fact held in Lien on behalf of the 2 git owners and this is where they are milking the club. In Lien is the collateral of the funds put up by the Yanks initially plus the skim or added interest fees that are added.
    So no you dont make profit on Lien but the special purpose vehicle that was created to milk a turn on the interest rate paid out by LFC over and above the one they are charged.

    I guess I'm not that impressed at your level of education because of your irreverand use of the word bollocks which in turn seriously embarasses you


    Carry on Einstein - you're doing so well.

    Leave a comment:


  • DannyMan2006
    replied
    Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
    Need to win the next five.
    Nah, four wins and a draw would be a good run and acceptable. Looking at city and Spurs fixtures over next five games we could easily be 4th soon enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mr Darko
    replied
    Originally posted by Shaggy View Post
    Need to win the next five.
    That's doesn't sound too difficult either. We won these corresponding fixtures last season when Torres and Gerrard weren't playing their best. Now with Cole playing I think we can't do any worse...

    LFC 3-0 Sunderland
    LFC *-* Blackpool // Should win comfortably
    Everton 0-2 LFC
    LFC 2-1 Blackburn
    Bolton 2-3 LFC

    Leave a comment:


  • Shaggy
    replied
    Need to win the next five.

    Leave a comment:


  • fah-q
    replied
    Originally posted by Frenchie View Post

    I guess I'm not that impressed at your level of education because of your irreverand use of the word bollocks which in turn seriously embarasses you
    Ummm........

    Leave a comment:


  • Neil Young
    replied
    We were pretty ****. It's too depressing to contemplate further.

    Leave a comment:


  • vonk
    replied
    Originally posted by Daniel Torres View Post
    He says that bringing on a striker was good, but its a pity that all we have available striker wise is N'Gog. Would you rather have seen Babel than N'Gog? in which case -why? N'Gog has 6 goals so far this season.
    Yeah, but he did nothing when he came on, just ran around a bit.

    Leave a comment:


  • vonk
    replied
    Originally posted by Marsh View Post
    well Roy wasnt taking maxi off and putting an unamed striker off was he he took maxi off and but ngog in.

    so not sure what your point is?
    I'm saying that taking Maxi off and putting a striker on in his place was a good idea. Shame that striker was Ngog, though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Daniel 7
    replied
    Originally posted by Marsh View Post
    well Roy wasnt taking maxi off and putting an unamed striker off was he he took maxi off and but ngog in.

    so not sure what your point is?
    He says that bringing on a striker was good, but its a pity that all we have available striker wise is N'Gog. Would you rather have seen Babel than N'Gog? in which case -why? N'Gog has 6 goals so far this season.

    Leave a comment:


  • pondus
    replied
    Somebody shoot Nani in the face, please. Utter cunt!

    Leave a comment:


  • CJ
    replied
    Originally posted by vonk View Post
    Taking Maxi off and putting on a striker was good. Shame NGog is not up to it though. He contributed nothing except maybe making someone mark him.
    well Roy wasnt taking maxi off and putting an unamed striker off was he he took maxi off and but ngog in.

    so not sure what your point is?

    Leave a comment:


  • vonk
    replied
    Originally posted by -V- View Post
    Isn't it funny how much more dangerous Torres looked when he had a striker partner? He won a penalty and a free kick because he was able to stretch their centre backs apart. Why? Because he had less players marking him and he wasn't outnumbered. He was properly supported.
    Taking Maxi off and putting on a striker was good. Shame NGog is not up to it though. He contributed nothing except maybe making someone mark him.

    Leave a comment:


  • vonk
    replied
    Originally posted by Mattshark View Post
    Your right, sorry!

    Leave a comment:


  • Frenchie
    Guest replied
    Originally posted by SimonNo7 View Post
    Where has he asset stripped?

    If you are talking about Mascherano, the guy wanted to leave. I agree we maybe haven't brought in as good a player but we haven't bought in a complete dud in Poulsen plus we have brought in Meireles. If you are talking about Benny we've brought in Cole, Insua we re-signed Aurelio and brought in Konchesky (IMO a better player than Insua although I would of rather Insua stayed as back-up) and finally Riera who sealed his own fate but I would agree we haven't exactly replaced him. The only place I can see asset stripping is clearing out some of the reserves who weren't really good enough.

    Now if you go to the profit on transfers then because of the state the club is in (because of the owners not Roy Hodgson) what we have actually done makes perfect sense.
    I'm afraid your idea that Hodgson is just a yes man could be cast on any manager that took the job. They are professionals who look at the job on offer and do what they need to do.
    The club has turned a profit on players yes they were replaced with assets of lesser quality..that is stripping..so to follow your argument then it is fine to sell Gerrard Torres and Reina and replace them with dozy dick and harry

    As for managers being professional hahahaha Hodgson couldnt believe his luck when he was offered the job at his age and standing of course he took it knowing he would have to do as he was told...

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X