Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Just watched our 2nd goal

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Originally posted by mick the click View Post
    Yep, it was pretty obvious - I hope SG isn't coming the big 'I am' again. What's he doing showboating anyway. If it was his 5th wondergoal in the match - fine, but otherwise thank the chap that made the opportunity and get on with getting another.

    Then again, maybe Torres is a dick.

    I dunno. I'm fed up with football...
    Stevie is due far more than Torres. I'm sure it was nothing but IF stevie wants to play the big "I am" then he can, he is in my opinioon the grestest player we have ever had and in all honesty should have ****ed us off a long time ago. He is a true legend even if he never wins the league.

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by Chrono View Post
      Stevie is due far more than Torres. I'm sure it was nothing but IF stevie wants to play the big "I am" then he can, he is in my opinioon the grestest player we have ever had and in all honesty should have ****ed us off a long time ago. He is a true legend even if he never wins the league.
      Close to being but a certain Kenneth Mathieson Dalglish takes that particular honour!

      At the game yesterday and to be honest Nando sulked around the pitch quite a bit again not sure if anyone noticed what looked like a hissy fit on the side lines when he threw the water bottle?

      Comment


        #18
        Torres looked pissed about something after the goal tho....
        "Thank you so much once more and always remember: You'll never walk alone." Rafa, Legend

        Comment


          #19
          Can you blame Torres for being pissed off? He has to fight hard for every scrap these days because we are so ****. He created both our goals last week and he created both our goals yesterday. The rest of the team are barely helping him

          Comment


            #20
            Originally posted by -V- View Post
            Can you blame Torres for being pissed off? He has to fight hard for every scrap these days because we are so ****. He created both our goals last week and he created both our goals yesterday. The rest of the team are barely helping him
            You've hit on the answer to the Gerrard/Cole debate. Gerrard in CM, Cole at LM and Torres in the creative role behind Torres.
            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
              You've hit on the answer to the Gerrard/Cole debate. Gerrard in CM, Cole at LM and Torres in the creative role behind Torres.
              96 Never Forgotten

              Comment


                #22
                Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                You've hit on the answer to the Gerrard/Cole debate. Gerrard in CM, Cole at LM and Torres in the creative role behind Torres.


                I'm increasingly thinking that Kuyt should be returned to the centre. At least he is a physical presence and would take pressure off Torres. You could even ask Torres to take positions deeper than him at times to allow him to run on and frighten defenders. Obviously not ideal but better than what we have seen this season I suspect.
                "The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
                -- William Blake

                Comment


                  #23
                  Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                  You've hit on the answer to the Gerrard/Cole debate. Gerrard in CM, Cole at LM and Torres in the creative role behind Torres.

                  Not many try Quantum formations. I think Roy's head would would literally explode in a massive hair mushroom cloud if this was suggested to him. Bring back Rafa - "ees possible"
                  Felching ≠ Gerbilling

                  Comment


                    #24
                    Originally posted by badpiggy View Post
                    Not many try Quantum formations. I think Roy's head would would literally explode in a massive hair mushroom cloud if this was suggested to him. Bring back Rafa - "ees possible"
                    The great thing about Torres is he is capable of behaving as both a particle and a wave. The trouble is the wave function collapses when he is observed.

                    If no-one watched him play he could easily fulfil both roles.

                    My next project is to use the LHC to accelerate Poulsen to just above walking pace (I know - it will take a massive amount of energy and may well be impossible) and then collide him into Konchesky. We'll track the resulting sub-atomic fragments and see if we can get anything useful out of them.
                    .
                    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                    May the Lord bless this post.

                    Comment


                      #25
                      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                      The great thing about Torres is he is capable of behaving as both a particle and a wave. The trouble is the wave function collapses when he is observed.

                      If no-one watched him play he could easily fulfil both roles.

                      My next project is to use the LHC to accelerate Poulsen to just above walking pace (I know - it will take a massive amount of energy and may well be impossible) and then collide him into Konchesky. We'll track the resulting sub-atomic fragments and see if we can get anything useful out of them.
                      Neil, are you just one of those guys who has spent their whole lives getting degrees at uni and studying and appear in documentaries with really long beards and glasses talking in that annoying matter of fact style?
                      96 Never Forgotten

                      Comment


                        #26
                        Totally, man.

                        [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqz9nnEmqAU&NR=1"]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tqz9nnEmqAU&NR=1[/ame]

                        By the way, I bet you didn't know I work with dww.
                        .
                        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                        May the Lord bless this post.

                        Comment


                          #27
                          Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                          The great thing about Torres is he is capable of behaving as both a particle and a wave. The trouble is the wave function collapses when he is observed.

                          If no-one watched him play he could easily fulfil both roles.

                          My next project is to use the LHC to accelerate Poulsen to just above walking pace (I know - it will take a massive amount of energy and may well be impossible) and then collide him into Konchesky. We'll track the resulting sub-atomic fragments and see if we can get anything useful out of them.

                          Comment


                            #28
                            Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                            The great thing about Torres is he is capable of behaving as both a particle and a wave. The trouble is the wave function collapses when he is observed.

                            If no-one watched him play he could easily fulfil both roles.

                            My next project is to use the LHC to accelerate Poulsen to just above walking pace (I know - it will take a massive amount of energy and may well be impossible) and then collide him into Konchesky. We'll track the resulting sub-atomic fragments and see if we can get anything useful out of them.
                            Felching ≠ Gerbilling

                            Comment


                              #29
                              I was expecting a picture of a dog but that was better
                              96 Never Forgotten

                              Comment


                                #30
                                Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                                The great thing about Torres is he is capable of behaving as both a particle and a wave. The trouble is the wave function collapses when he is observed.

                                If no-one watched him play he could easily fulfil both roles.

                                My next project is to use the LHC to accelerate Poulsen to just above walking pace (I know - it will take a massive amount of energy and may well be impossible) and then collide him into Konchesky. We'll track the resulting sub-atomic fragments and see if we can get anything useful out of them.
                                Are we winning?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X