Originally posted by Neil Young
View Post
-
AA? -
No need. I can't drive at the moment.Originally posted by Reece View Post.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
-
I saw the press conference on the BBC breakfast programme this morning and it just made me so angry - the man is a turd and sooner he is relieved of his post the better."Love, love is a verb
Love is a doing word"Comment
-
-
-
I see.Originally posted by Reece View PostNo I meant.... nevermind.
I have enormous respect for our fellow poster but I don't see why you brought AnfieldDanfield into the conversation..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Hehe. Too early is it Neil?
Are we winning?Comment
-
Yes, Kurt, of course it is.Originally posted by NigelLG View PostHehe. Too early is it Neil?.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
-
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Ah, that chap.Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
Would you prefer 'whoosh'?
Are we winning?Comment
-
Yep, Nigey, that's the one. Now, why do you think I called you by that name?Originally posted by Kurt View PostAh, that chap.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Er, Hodgson out..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
Roy on Shelvey. Spot the Royism
"He's a confident young man, but he's a modest young man as well and he knows there is a lot of work to be done before he can hold his head up and say, 'Look at me, what a good Premier League player I am.'
"But in players like Gerrard in particular, and also Poulsen and Lucas, he's got players he can look at as the benchmark and what he's got to reach. Hopefully they'll help him reach it."A lot of people run a race to see who is fastest. I run to see who has the most guts, who can punish himself into exhausting pace, and then at the end, punish himself even more.Comment
Comment