Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Much like the defeat at Everton this season featuring 8 players who started the 4-1 win at Old Trafford, 8 of last night's starting XI started the 4-0 win over Real Madrid.
Unbelievable.
Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’
Isn't Maddock one of Purslow's stooges? So he's doing everything he can to still, somehow, paint Hodgson in a positive light - Purslow of course being responsible for sacking Benitez and replacing him with this idiot.
Yep. Bascombe also does some stooge work for Cecil.
Much like the defeat at Everton this season featuring 8 players who started the 4-1 win at Old Trafford, 8 of last night's starting XI started the 4-0 win over Real Madrid.
Unbelievable.
This is an oft-quoted stat on forums like this one yet the media still claim he was left no quality. It is unbelievable.
I have one word to offer - honesty. I couldn't be devious if I tried. Joe Fagan.
Are you saying the 'in the hole role' is different from the 'in the hole position' ?
Somebody playing in centre midfield could be given creative freedom, likewise a winger could have creative freedom to roam and not stay glued to the touchline.
Hallelujah. Indeed, someone 'could' be. And as i've said, it's not so much the position of playing wide, it's more the role - and it's lack of freedom.
Indeed, Roy may well have not promised a 'certain position'. Very cleverly worded by the old duffer.
Hallelujah. Indeed, someone 'could' be. And as i've said, it's not so much the position of playing wide, it's more the role - and it's lack of freedom.
Indeed, Roy may well have not promised a 'certain position'. Very cleverly worded by the old duffer.
Did The Bodge promise Cole the 'in the hole role' or did he promise Cole 'creative freedom'. If a winger plays on the wing and is given creative freedom, is he fullfilling the 'in the hole role'?
I knew you would start arguing over the definition of roles, that's why I mentioned it in an earlier post........
How the **** was it cleverly worded? The Bodge categorically stated he did not promise Cole the position off the front striker - i.e. 'the in the hole role', or are you now going to argue over the definition of the 'in the hole' role?
I have to say that I agree with Hodgson about one thing, and that is its time to start supporting the club now. It was all rather unpleasant last night and whilst I agree that he isn't the man for the job, I felt a little embarrassed last night at the "Hodgson for England", "Dalglish" and cheers for Konchesky's substitution.
At first I thought it was amusing but that soon changed. We're turning into Newcastle.
Danny Kelly displaying, as we discussed earlier, unbelieveable ignorance. He's just actually said "The new American owners will now have to sack the man they've only recently appointed"
I have one word to offer - honesty. I couldn't be devious if I tried. Joe Fagan.
Tony Evans tearing into Bodge as we speak on Talksport.
Marcotti was sounding the death-knell for him on 5Live just now.
It's unstoppable. He's clearly going to go in the summer and if things get any worse he'll be gone sooner.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
I've been critical of Evans, with good reason, this past 12 months but it was highly reassuring to hear a top(?) journo from a big paper absolutely caning Hodgson. No punches pulled whatsoever.
I have one word to offer - honesty. I couldn't be devious if I tried. Joe Fagan.
I have to say that I agree with Hodgson about one thing, and that is its time to start supporting the club now. It was all rather unpleasant last night and whilst I agree that he isn't the man for the job, I felt a little embarrassed last night at the "Hodgson for England", "Dalglish" and cheers for Konchesky's substitution.
At first I thought it was amusing but that soon changed. We're turning into Newcastle.
I have supported Liverpool fc all of my life. I do not need telling to support the club by someone who has all but destoyed the club on the pitch. This is the ultimate insult
The person responsible for the demise is blaming everything and anything apart from himself.
This person has been found out, big time
This person is grossly incompetent
This person has done nothing since arriving to warrent any respect
This person has badmouthed supporters (now he wants support!)
I have supported Liverpool fc all of my life. I do not need telling to support the club by someone who has all but destoyed the club on the pitch. This is the ultimate insult
The person responsible for the demise is blaming everything and anything apart from himself.
This person has been found out, big time
This person is grossly incompetent
This person has done nothing since arriving to warrent any respect
This person has badmouthed supporters (now he wants support!)
This person is a real life Walter Mitty
This person can go **** himself
I give up. Who is it?
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Aldo (may God forgive me) is a bell end at times. We don't seem to have any ex player willing enough, clued up enough and eloquent enough to fight our corner on Talk****e and 5live etc. They all talk drivel.
I have one word to offer - honesty. I couldn't be devious if I tried. Joe Fagan.
Comment