Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SOS Planning Rafa tribute for Wolves game

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    We know.

    Not directed at you specifically DD but everyone knows what everyone thinks about Rafa. Do we all really need to restate our position when a new titbit gets posted?
    .
    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



    May the Lord bless this post.

    Comment


      I donno Neil but when someone takes such a chauvinistic stand it's hard not to rebut
      Patience when teased often, transforms into rage

      Comment


        Can anybody tell me if there is an ignore button on the control panel ??

        Comment


          Yes, it's under 'Settings & Options'

          Comment


            Originally posted by destinydude View Post
            I donno Neil but when someone takes such a chauvinistic stand it's hard not to rebut
            Yes, I understand that. Like I said, it wasn't a go at you and thanks for not taking umbrage and for an honest (if not exactly neutral) reply.

            I think ArmchairKopite's post was kind of OK, although obviously, bearing in mind my point, his comment about the owners might have been better left unsaid. At least Reina's comment was 'news' (I use the term very loosely) and relevant to the thread.

            The thing is, what we post on here isn't all that important to anyone except ourselves, especially by the time it gets to the thirtieth time round the houses with the same arguments. So I suppose I'm asking everyone to bear that in mind since the endless spats about Rafa are becoming tedious in the extreme. All that continuing the argument does is make the place less interesting for us, in my opinion of course.

            It's so bloody quiet here though. If we didn't yabber about Rafa then maybe there'd be nothing said about anything.

            .
            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



            May the Lord bless this post.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
              Yes, I understand that. Like I said, it wasn't a go at you and thanks for not taking umbrage and for an honest (if not exactly neutral) reply.

              I think ArmchairKopite's post was kind of OK, although obviously, bearing in mind my point, his comment about the owners might have been better left unsaid. At least Reina's comment was 'news' (I use the term very loosely) and relevant to the thread.

              The thing is, what we post on here isn't all that important to anyone except ourselves, especially by the time it gets to the thirtieth time round the houses with the same arguments. So I suppose I'm asking everyone to bear that in mind since the endless spats about Rafa are becoming tedious in the extreme. All that continuing the argument does is make the place less interesting for us, in my opinion of course.

              It's so bloody quiet here though. If we didn't yabber about Rafa then maybe there'd be nothing said about anything.

              I understand.
              Patience when teased often, transforms into rage

              Comment


                Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                Yes, I understand that. Like I said, it wasn't a go at you and thanks for not taking umbrage and for an honest (if not exactly neutral) reply.

                I think ArmchairKopite's post was kind of OK, although obviously, bearing in mind my point, his comment about the owners might have been better left unsaid. At least Reina's comment was 'news' (I use the term very loosely) and relevant to the thread.

                The thing is, what we post on here isn't all that important to anyone except ourselves, especially by the time it gets to the thirtieth time round the houses with the same arguments. So I suppose I'm asking everyone to bear that in mind since the endless spats about Rafa are becoming tedious in the extreme. All that continuing the argument does is make the place less interesting for us, in my opinion of course.

                It's so bloody quiet here though. If we didn't yabber about Rafa then maybe there'd be nothing said about anything.

                In knew it so you're pro-Hodgson then eh..................old farts sticking together!
                Last edited by kemm1; 28-12-10, 02:57 PM.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Neil Young View Post

                  I think ArmchairKopite's post was kind of OK, although obviously, bearing in mind my point, his comment about the owners might have been better left unsaid. At least Reina's comment was 'news' (I use the term very loosely) and relevant to the thread.


                  At least Reinas comment was news what do you want video footage.

                  If you want to discuss my comment about the owners by all means do so but please don't be so condescending in your posts its irritating especially when your reasoning with an arsehole.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by kemm1 View Post
                    In knew it so you're pro-Hodgson then eh..................old fart sticking together!


                    Originally posted by Armchairkopite View Post
                    At least Reinas comment was news what do you want video footage.

                    If you want to discuss my comment about the owners by all means do so but please don't be so condescending in your posts its irritating especially when your reasoning with an arsehole.
                    Oh come off it. I agree with you and I said your post was justified because it was news whereas I thought DD's added nothing.

                    If you find my post to someone else patronising and condescending then that's your problem.

                    I fear you're missing the wood for the trees here.
                    .
                    Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                    May the Lord bless this post.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by Neil Young View Post



                      Oh come off it. I agree with you and I said your post was justified because it was news whereas I thought DD's added nothing.

                      If you find my post to someone else patronising and condescending then that's your problem.

                      I fear you're missing the wood for the trees here.
                      Fair enough, I thought it was out of character to be fair.

                      Just my interpretation or misinterpretation of what you wrote.

                      Comment


                        Oh the irony
                        Patience when teased often, transforms into rage

                        Comment


                          Originally posted by Armchairkopite View Post
                          Fair enough, I thought it was out of character to be fair.

                          Just my interpretation or misinterpretation of what you wrote.


                          Originally posted by destinydude View Post
                          Oh the irony
                          Oh FFS you two, stop bitching.




                          Where are the mods? They should be doing this job rather than moaning about buying tyres.
                          .
                          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                          May the Lord bless this post.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                            We know.

                            Not directed at you specifically DD but everyone knows what everyone thinks about Rafa. Do we all really need to restate our position when a new titbit gets posted?

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by Neil Young View Post
                              Yes, I understand that. Like I said, it wasn't a go at you and thanks for not taking umbrage and for an honest (if not exactly neutral) reply.

                              I think ArmchairKopite's post was kind of OK, although obviously, bearing in mind my point, his comment about the owners might have been better left unsaid. At least Reina's comment was 'news' (I use the term very loosely) and relevant to the thread.

                              The thing is, what we post on here isn't all that important to anyone except ourselves, especially by the time it gets to the thirtieth time round the houses with the same arguments. So I suppose I'm asking everyone to bear that in mind since the endless spats about Rafa are becoming tedious in the extreme. All that continuing the argument does is make the place less interesting for us, in my opinion of course.

                              It's so bloody quiet here though. If we didn't yabber about Rafa then maybe there'd be nothing said about anything.

                              dave of mutilation

                              Comment


                                Originally posted by Arn View Post
                                Why are you discussing thing with an obvious Manc(Bulld0g)?

                                Look at his post history and decide yourself if he is a Liverpool fan or not. I would say looking at it makes it very clear what he is.......

                                Almost all of his posts are moaning or wind up ones.

                                Just ignore him and don't let him destroy the threads
                                Oh dear a manc I have had my season ticket for the Kop for the last 25 years and been standing\watching from there for the last 40. If you want to check my posts like you obviously have, you will see my "moaning" is about clueless fans who want to go backwards and reappoint a manager who was not good enough first time around

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X