Is purslow keeping

[merlboo]

interesting that this is about Purslow.

you would almost think that sos have an agenda against him.

Firstly, These are only my views as an LFC supporter and aren't necessarily indicative of policy or the membership

Its the way i'm seeing it as an individual ( if i'm allowed that right )

My question was , he is still there as a non exec director

Still attends the games , Home and Away

Still frequents Melwood ocassionally and to that end pretty much doing half of the things he was doing before the takeover

NESV have not appointed anyone in the CEO hotseat yet

They are holed up in Boston Massachussetts relying on Ian Ayre (Christian's Ally) to hold the fort here for 95% of the time

He'll still wield something of an influence in my book until the vacuum of power has been filled

Thats just how i'm seeing it

Would you want to be remembered for the worst managerial appointment in history ?

[merlboo]

Do you really think that Purslow would be trying to defend Hodgson if he wants to retain any credibility and influence on the LFC Board?

I think he'll be saying sadly, although being the manager of the year or whatever, it's not working out.

We maybe talking about someone who could sell sand to the arabs here

He kept Torres here during the summer off the back of some serious misleading information regarding team strengthening and the team going forward

We've been in constant reverse since he appointed the Yes man with 35 years of f..k all

PS ... ''Its not working out'' , I nearly spat me Coffee all over me laptop

[DannyMan2006]

Would you want to be remembered for the worst managerial appointment in history ?

Hodgson will be gone by next season, that's a definite now.

If NESV appoint the right man LFC could go on to have success as is the vision of NESV. If that happens, Purslow will be remembered as one of those that brought NESV to the table and got the deal done in difficult circumstances, along with Broughton and Ayre.

That's the legacy.

Anyhow, Purslow should be removed, I agree with that. I don't doubt that he is a massive fan and has only ever had the clubs best interests at heart. But he's in over his head. I guess he thought he had to take it upon himself when no one else was there.

I think we'll be better off when we get a CEO in.

[RedSince1964]

Hodgson will be gone by next season, that's a definite now. I want him gone now

If NESV appoint the right man LFC could go on to have success as is the vision of NESV. If that happens, Purslow will be remembered as one of those that brought NESV to the table and got the deal done in difficult circumstances, along with Broughton and Ayre.

That's the legacy.

Anyhow, Purslow should be removed, 100% spot on I agree with that. I don't doubt that he is a massive fan and has only ever had the clubs best interests at heart. But he's in over his head. I guess he thought he had to take it upon himself when no one else was there.

I think we'll be better off when we get a CEO in. should have been apointed by now imo

[merlboo]

Hodgson will be gone by next season, that's a definite now.

If NESV appoint the right man LFC could go on to have success as is the vision of NESV. If that happens, Purslow will be remembered as one of those that brought NESV to the table and got the deal done in difficult circumstances, along with Broughton and Ayre.

That's the legacy.

Anyhow, Purslow should be removed, I agree with that. I don't doubt that he is a massive fan and has only ever had the clubs best interests at heart. But he's in over his head. I guess he thought he had to take it upon himself when no one else was there.

I think we'll be better off when we get a CEO in.

So your saying the Rafa sacking and Hodgson appointment should be airbrushed ?

[cream]

So your saying the Rafa sacking and Hodgson appointment should be airbrushed ?

No, he is saying the sooner we get a new CEO in, the better. Then we can get rid of Purslow, Roy and move forward. Not hard is it?

[merlboo]

No, he is saying the sooner we get a new CEO in, the better. Then we can get rid of Purslow, Roy and move forward. Not hard is it?

I could of sworn Danny wrote this




If NESV appoint the right man LFC could go on to have success as is the vision of NESV. If that happens, Purslow will be remembered as one of those that brought NESV to the table and got the deal done in difficult circumstances, along with Broughton and Ayre.

That's the legacy.




Did you miss that ?

[dom9]

Marsh in sensible posts shocker!

Merlboo in usual car crash.

[merlboo]

Marsh in sensible posts shocker!

Merlboo in usual car crash.

Oh, so he should be absolved of the blame in firing Rafa and getting in Roy

Ahh , I see

Carry on

[cream]

I could of sworn Danny wrote this




If NESV appoint the right man LFC could go on to have success as is the vision of NESV. If that happens, Purslow will be remembered as one of those that brought NESV to the table and got the deal done in difficult circumstances, along with Broughton and Ayre.

That's the legacy.




Did you miss that ?

He also wrote the following

Anyhow, Purslow should be removed, I agree with that. I don't doubt that he is a massive fan and has only ever had the clubs best interests at heart. But he's in over his head. I guess he thought he had to take it upon himself when no one else was there.

I think we'll be better off when we get a CEO in.


Did you miss that ?

[dom9]

No not at all. His remit was to sell the club, which he did. He also exceeded his remit in being complicit with the Hodge appointment. By the way, i don't remember SOS protesting about it at the time. Prove me wrong.

To suggest he is still pulling the strings is a joke.

[merlboo]

He also wrote the following

Anyhow, Purslow should be removed, I agree with that. I don't doubt that he is a massive fan and has only ever had the clubs best interests at heart. But he's in over his head. I guess he thought he had to take it upon himself when no one else was there.

I think we'll be better off when we get a CEO in.


Did you miss that ?

Legacy

Thats the bit that jumps out to me

[DannyMan2006]

So your saying the Rafa sacking and Hodgson appointment should be airbrushed ?

I'm saying that's what he'll be remebered for. You seem to think that he is on a power trip and sacked Rafa for the sheer hell of it. I'm saying he had the best interests of the club at heart, but got some big decisions wrong.

I don't see why he should be dragged through the dirt just because he got things wrong. It seemed obvious to me that Rafa should only walk if we got someone of his level in.

But I think you'll find that countless LFC fans were only to happy to have Rafa removed at any cost - funnily enough, in exactly the way I feel about Roy now. Me personally, I could never see why people hated Rafa so much, but they did.

Should Purslow be put to the sword because he wasn't a fan of Rafa?

I don't think he should.

[merlboo]

No not at all. His remit was to sell the club, which he did. He also exceeded his remit in being complicit with the Hodge appointment. By the way, i don't remember SOS protesting about it at the time. Prove me wrong.

To suggest he is still pulling the strings is a joke.

And the butchering of Rafa ?

Oh Dom , as i've mentioned earlier , this is me speaking as a fan

If I remember rightly there was a well documented demo outside the ground on Rafa's sacking by Liverpool supporters and if we knew we were getting Roy '' Mike walker mk 2 '' Hodgson in then, then those who made that decision should of been publicly lashed for the mere thought of it there and then

Anyway carry on defending him

It'd usually be mildly amusing if we weren't looking at a relegation dogfight

[dom9]

I'm not defending him.

Did you protest at Roy's appointment at the time? No.

Too stoned to carry on the debate now.