but he took them to 2nd befor crashing hilariously to mid table and a relegaton battle. Paisley took over a good team and made them great over a sustained period then ripped the team apart and made a new great team, that and he signed three of the clubs best players in the one season, hansen, souness and dalglish. he also didnt have the overwhelming financial superiority that slur alex has had until roman turned up.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
b charlton inadvertedly proves a point
Collapse
X
-
To be honest I was partly playing devils advocate. I think Paisley is better, but people have a tendency to denegrate Fergusons achievements as opposing fans due to the medias tedious over hyping of him for a decade.
Also Fergie gets credit for unearthing the comic genius that is Phil Neville."The man who never alters his opinion is like standing water, and breeds reptiles of the mind."
-- William Blake
Comment
-
The scum are very light up front, one or two key injuries and they'll be in trouble.
Not to mention that the only decent opposition they've faced (Arsenal), made them look like also-rans.
They were hardly impressive against us either, despite how **** we were.White liquid in a bottle = Milk
Purslow = C*nt
Comment
-
Well don't do it then.Originally posted by ShaggyAlonsoI can't stand ****ing Bobby Charlton..
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment

Comment