Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Liverpool seem pretty sure the 'release clause' is bull**** and you would hope our lawers are equally as confident if this goes to court. That said, Liverpool were taken to court by Gua Comolli over unfair dismissle, the same man who sanctioned 20m for Downing (28 year old) and 35m for Carroll (half a season in top flight) and we LOST the case so saying I don't rate our lawers is putting it mildly.
Based on one case? Or maybe you're including the Ziege case too.
Two cases then. Any more?
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
The Heinze one works for me though. He tried to get himself out of his deal to come to us and failed. Utd won. Hopefully the same happens with Suarez and we get to call the shots
Three cases then, going back a decade or so. And as Tee says, we won the biggest of the lot.
None of us even know whether the same lawyers are involved - there are certainly some different areas of law - or even the same firms.
It doesn't really matter and we're all free to think what we like about the lawyers the club uses, if we really haven't got better things to think about.
But I doubt the vast majority of us (including me) are qualified or knowledgeable enough to opine on the merits of the club's legal representation just as we don't have a clue about corporate accounting, etc. - although that hasn't stopped people (mis)reading balance sheets and going into tedious and erroneous detail about transfer payments and sponsorship deals and all that.
We may know little about football too but at least we can watch the games and have some idea of what's happening on the pitch.
Well, most of us have, I'm not including Nige obviously.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Well the simple solution is if Pere and Suarez hit us with a legal case then we should roll up with the big dog, Grabbiner. Break both of their's balls
I'm not sure Grabiner would feel able to take on a contract dispute of such magnitude.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
If Suarez takes us to court then it's over with regards to keeping him. No way Suarez takes us to court and plays for Liverpool ever again.
Exactly how he got out of Gronigen. Lost the court case but Gronigen accepted that there is no way he could play for them again and the fans turned against him too. Gronigen then accepted the Ajax bid
If we are looking into the legality of various contract issues, we should also make sure that it is investigated as to how Arsenal became aware of this over £40m+ clause in his contract, because something untoward has certainly been going on there.
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
Comment