Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
anfieldonline Anfield Online
KD on Suarez awaiting charge re: Evra:"Been 9 weeks now waiting. Carries on like this he may have had his testimonial."
14 minutes ago
anfieldonline Anfield Online
KD: "(On Suarez charge) There have been at least 4 other incidents we have seen elsewhere that have seen no charge from the FA."
16 minutes ago
anfieldonline Anfield Online
KD: "Referee's are inconsistent with their interpretations of the laws of the game. We want the same rules as everyone else."
18 minutes ago
anfieldonline Anfield Online
KD: "We decided not to appeal over Jay's red because of lack of representation at hearings. He intended to win the ball."
19 minutes ago
On the flipside, Kenny's obviously right in everything he says there, not that it will make a difference. But at least he's plainly speaking the truth.
On the flipside, Kenny's obviously right in everything he says there, not that it will make a difference. But at least he's plainly speaking the truth.
It's good to (publicly) know that the club are looking at all the same things fans like us on forums are seeing as well (ie. the other 4 incidents etc.) so you know they will use that when indeed it comes to a hearing. Not that it'll make any difference, as the ****ing Arseholes will just say 'Well, those incidents are done, we made our (innocent) verdicts, now we're going to **** you and your players up the behind.'
Assuming the other players Kenny refered to are English (Rooney, Beckham(?), Cole), would now be an appropriate time to play the race card?
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
You suggesting we could take it to the court of arbitration of sports on the basis of discrimination?
No, my comment was in jest. But there is IMO some truth behind it. There does seem to be a huge case of double standards here, important players in the England squad don't seem subject to the same rules and punishments as other players...
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.
No, my comment was in jest. But there is IMO some truth behind it. There does seem to be a huge case of double standards here, important players in the England squad don't seem subject to the same rules and punishments as other players...
Will be interesting to see what happens in the Terry/Ferdinand case.
No, my comment was in jest. But there is IMO some truth behind it. There does seem to be a huge case of double standards here, important players in the England squad don't seem subject to the same rules and punishments as other players...
That's always been true (e.g. Bryan Robson, Alan Shearer, etc.) but I agree, it is an injustice.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment