Dear Guest
Thank you for visiting! est189 will soon be closing its doors (do forums have doors?) please visit the following thread - (to wail & cry perhaps?)
https://www.est1892.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?p=4002484#post4002484
Thanjk you.
Paul.S
Agree that he deserves to be playing in the CL, but if we can make a couple of good signings early doors in the summer then I think he'll opt to stay for one more season.
If we don't qualify for the CL next season then I think he'll be off.
Just my humble opinion.
As long as he works his bollocks off whilst he's here (which he will) and leaves on good terms then I won't begrudge him a move.
If we spend big [if] and sign one or two top players that might convince louis to stay for another season
Suarez's attitude on the pitch is the massive difference between him and Torres
You know Suarez will give his all till the day hes gone
He deserves Champions League football as you say and hes far better than we are at this moment in time
He'll have a chance to leave this summer and I expect him to take it
These days? Nothing more than a ridiculous myth imo.
"Loyalty" exists among a very small minority of players like Gerrard and Carragher. Always has done and nothing has changed. And players are much more likely to be "loyal" to a club when they are likely to be succesful. Would Giggs and Scholes still be at United if they were a mid-table table team? Same with Terry at Chelsea. Same with our players throughout the 70s and 80s.
I remember in the 80s when there might have been a rare one-club player retiring (I can't think of any examples) and people used to say that this kind of loyalty was practicaly a thing of a past. Imo, the number of one club players at the top clubs has increased massively in the past 15 years. i.e from practically none, to a handful.
These days? Nothing more than a ridiculous myth imo.
"Loyalty" exists among a very small minority of players like Gerrard and Carragher. Always has done and nothing has changed. And players are much more likely to be "loyal" to a club when they are likely to be succesful. Would Giggs and Scholes still be at United if they were a mid-table table team? Same with Terry at Chelsea. Same with our players throughout the 70s and 80s.
I remember in the 80s when there might have been a rare one-club player retiring (I can't think of any examples) and people used to say that this kind of loyalty was practicaly a thing of a past. Imo, the number of one club players at the top clubs has increased massively in the past 15 years. i.e from practically none, to a handful.
Yep, 'loyalty' and success go hand in hand.
The King was back for a short while. Long live The King.
Top players cost money both in terms of fees and wages
How do you manage to sign them when you are looking to cut the wage bill further?
...but isn't that what we're looking to do by offloading the likes of Carroll, Spearing and a few others who've been off the pace since Xmas, and then we've got the wage bill savings from Carra's retirement... Surely that brings in cash to top up the kitty and frees up monthly wages bill for some incoming activity...?
These days? Nothing more than a ridiculous myth imo.
"Loyalty" exists among a very small minority of players like Gerrard and Carragher. Always has done and nothing has changed. And players are much more likely to be "loyal" to a club when they are likely to be succesful. Would Giggs and Scholes still be at United if they were a mid-table table team? Same with Terry at Chelsea. Same with our players throughout the 70s and 80s.
I remember in the 80s when there might have been a rare one-club player retiring (I can't think of any examples) and people used to say that this kind of loyalty was practicaly a thing of a past. Imo, the number of one club players at the top clubs has increased massively in the past 15 years. i.e from practically none, to a handful.
There was plenty back in the late 60's, 70' & 80's it just wasnt publicsed because it wasnt unusual
Heres a few that immediately spring to mind
Billy Liddel, Ronnie Moran, Gerry Byrne, Brian Labone*, Jimmy Arnfield, Eddie Gray, Jack Charlton
Theres probably many more from the lower league teams as well back then
* bit inaccurate because Labone use to frequently turn out for the King Harry Pub Sunday League side whilst playing for Everton
...but isn't that what we're looking to do by offloading the likes of Carroll, Spearing and a few others who've been off the pace since Xmas, and then we've got the wage bill savings from Carra's retirement... Surely that brings in cash to top up the kitty and frees up monthly wages bill for some incoming activity...?
Yes that brings cash in but top players also demand big salaries and dare I say that those savings you have listed above could easily be swallowed up by the signing of a couple of top players
Bob Paisley - "This club has been my life. I'd go out and sweep the street and be proud to do it for Liverpool if they asked me to."
There was plenty back in the late 60's, 70' & 80's it just wasnt publicsed because it wasnt unusual
Heres a few that immediately spring to mind
Billy Liddel, Ronnie Moran, Gerry Byrne, Brian Labone, Jimmy Arnfield, Eddie Gray, Jack Charlton
Theres probably many more from the lower league teams as well back then
Or maybe players just moved around less because the wages weren't as good so the cost of upheaval in their personal lives wasn't worth it, etc. Do we even know whether there are more transfers these days? I'd guess it's likely.
It depends on whether you define loyalty as a state of mind (he's loyal because he chose to stay at one club) or simply a feature of behaviour (he's loyal because he stayed at one club). It's often not easy to distinguish the former from the latter but I suspect the fatuous tossers on TV who trot out the cliché about loyalty being a thing of the past haven't got quite that far.
. Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
Comment