Originally posted by Alex
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Luis Suárez
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
There is a clear difference between posting something Tweeted by a reputable(?!) journalist or media outlet, and posting something from a clearly made-up Twitter account such as "@SuperHotBreakingLFCTransferNews". Anyone could create the later and it's just completely unsubstantiated (albeit sometimes simply repeating what other sources have said).Originally posted by Bender View Postbut i said last week lets either keep all twitter stuff in the twitter thread or just put it in the transfer thread......also other posters do it ............ but if it makes you happy ......but like i said others do the same
I really don't think it's that difficult to differentiate between the two and post them accordingly.
You're somewhat prolific at the latter, which is probably why you're being asked more than others.
Comment
-
He would also lose out on the % of the transfer fee, 10% IIRC.Originally posted by Bender View PostTotal LFC @TheTotalLFC 3m
If Luis Suárez hands in written transfer request he will lose out ~£2m loyalty bonus. #LFCStop the cyberhate

from now on I will skip talking about our finances. That is a promise and will save myself from looking like a 
Susan Black
Comment
-
Everyone else posts dog pictures too but that doesn't mean... no wait..Originally posted by Bender View Postbut i said last week lets either keep all twitter stuff in the twitter thread or just put it in the transfer thread......also other posters do it ............ but if it makes you happy ......but like i said others do the sameWas muß, das muß.
Comment
-
fine lets see how long till others do itOriginally posted by Reece View PostThere is a clear difference between posting something Tweeted by a reputable(?!) journalist or media outlet, and posting something from a clearly made-up Twitter account such as "@SuperHotBreakingLFCTransferNews". Anyone could create the later and it's just completely unsubstantiated (albeit sometimes simply repeating what other sources have said).
I really don't think it's that difficult to differentiate between the two and post them accordingly.
You're somewhat prolific at the latter, which is probably why you're being asked more than others.
Comment
-
No one is judging the validity of the story. Just the source of it. Its site policy, so we have to enforce it.Originally posted by Sarb View PostThink it's a bit harsh. The only thing speculative about that tweet is probably the value. It's pretty obvious that there is a loyalty bonus issue surrounding this Luis Suarez transfer story.
*Except Michael, who died.
Comment
-
Are we now allowed to post dog pics without spoiler tags in the Twitter thread?Originally posted by foresterbloke View PostEveryone else posts dog pictures too but that doesn't mean... no wait..
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.
Comment
-
I get that but my point is that if Madrid meet the release clause, then he doesn’t need to put in a transfer request and give up his bonus as the club have to accept the offer anyway. Him putting in a transfer request won’t make Madrid any more likely to put in a bid if they still have to pay the same amount, ie. whatever the clause is set at.Originally posted by Assassin View PostIf a player puts in a tranny request. The lose out on the "the golden handshake" of a few millions as part of unpaid wages for the duration of the the contract and possibly a % of the transfer fee. In Suarez's case I am guessing this could be several millions of £'s
So what is the point of it then and why would Suarez agree to it? What does either party gain from it? I’m pretty sure Madrid have already spoken to Suarez or his agent, so what difference does it make if they offer £40m?Originally posted by Sarb View PostBecause apparently the clause is set at something like £40m but it triggers the club actually being allowed to talk to the player and LFC considering the bid, but it doesn't mean that the bid has to be accepted at £40m by us. Hence, us allegedly putting a deadline on when a deal must be completed. Pretty sure a few of the reliable journalists like Barrett, King, Hunter said this a couple of weeks ago
I’m still not convinced there is a clause TBH.If we are all only happy when we are really winning in the end, when your race finishes, what life would that be?
Comment
-
Me neither budOriginally posted by RedReet View PostI get that but my point is that if Madrid meet the release clause, then he doesn’t need to put in a transfer request and give up his bonus as the club have to accept the offer anyway. Him putting in a transfer request won’t make Madrid any more likely to put in a bid if they still have to pay the same amount, ie. whatever the clause is set at.
So what is the point of it then and why would Suarez agree to it? What does either party gain from it? I’m pretty sure Madrid have already spoken to Suarez or his agent, so what difference does it make if they offer £40m?
I’m still not convinced there is a clause TBH.
unless, their has something official been said and i've missed it
Comment



Comment