Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Harry Kewell

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
    #16
    Originally posted by Neil Young
    I was only kidding mate. It was a humorous attempt to suggest that actually you choose to watch it. No offence meant - sorry if it came across badly.

    I didn't mean to call your honesty into question. I also don't really think you're a music bore or a music snob.

    Well, maybe you are a bit of a music snob but it's good to have standards (no pun intended) and it does make for much amusement.

    You're too polite for your own good.
    Thomas Hicks Senior

    Comment

      #17
      Originally posted by Neil Young
      I was only kidding mate. It was a humorous attempt to suggest that actually you choose to watch it. No offence meant - sorry if it came across badly.

      I didn't mean to call your honesty into question. I also don't really think you're a music bore or a music snob.

      Well, maybe you are a bit of a music snob but it's good to have standards (no pun intended) and it does make for much amusement.


      notice too how he gets all over defensive about the programme, a clear indication that he actually watches the programme in some depth.
      Bill shankly to Tommy Smith after he'd turned up for training with a bandaged knee:
      'Take that poof bandage off, and what do you mean YOUR knee, it's LIVERPOOL'S knee !'

      "Sorry, boss, I should have kept my legs together," said Lawrence. "No, Tommy, your mother should have kept her legs together!," replied Shankly.

      * After Tommy Lawrence had let in a fluke goal between his legs

      Comment

        #18
        Originally posted by Morphorino
        You're too polite for your own good.
        It costs nothing. :doffs hat:
        .
        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



        May the Lord bless this post.

        Comment

          #19
          Originally posted by bazza76

          notice too how he gets all over defensive about the programme, a clear indication that he actually watches the programme in some depth.
          Now you draw my attention to it...
          .
          Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



          May the Lord bless this post.

          Comment

            #20
            Originally posted by Neil Young
            It costs nothing. :doffs hat:
            Thomas Hicks Senior

            Comment

              #21
              I think Carol Mcgiffin used to be married to Chris Evans
              I live with Steptoe.

              Comment

                #22
                Originally posted by Mumsafan
                I think Carol Mcgiffin used to be married to Chris Evans
                She did, aye.

                Anyway it's just picked up - BRIAN BLESSED is on!!!!

                He's ****ing mental as always.
                Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                Comment

                  #23
                  Compare and contrast the following two statements and draw your conclusions about the state of mind of the person who said them.

                  Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso
                  ****in' wank programme. Hate it with a passion.
                  Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso
                  Anyway it's just picked up - BRIAN BLESSED is on!!!!
                  .
                  Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                  May the Lord bless this post.

                  Comment

                    #24
                    You’ve rumbled me, Neil, you’ve rumbled me. I’m a confused individual…possibly clinically fed-up too.
                    Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                    Comment

                      #25
                      Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso
                      She's on it all the time. If I ever meet that BITCH Carol McGiffin (whoever the **** she is) I swear I will punch her flush in the face.

                      ****in' wank programme. Hate it with a passion.



                      So true Shaggy
                      When you feel like you're done, you are not alone........

                      Comment

                        #26
                        Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso
                        You’ve rumbled me, Neil, you’ve rumbled me. I’m a confused individual…possibly clinically fed-up too.
                        What's the matter, lad?
                        .
                        Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                        May the Lord bless this post.

                        Comment

                          #27
                          Originally posted by Neil Young
                          What's the matter, lad?
                          Nothing!
                          Thanks very much for being ‘This Mornings’ Farmer’

                          Comment

                            #28
                            Originally posted by ShaggyAlonso
                            Nothing!
                            Oh. Well, that's good.
                            .
                            Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.



                            May the Lord bless this post.

                            Comment

                            Previous 1 2 template Next
                            Working...
                            X