i was more generalising on the names i mentioned....... just woke up so am trying to scrambel my brain
-
-
It looks like you succeeded once again.
.
Suppose you have a physicist and a sociologist standing at the side of a field, observing a set of events unfolding on the field. The physicist does [describes] it using the terminology of mass and velocity and frequency of radiation and the rest. And the sociologist does it by describing it as a rugby match.
May the Lord bless this post.Comment
-
-
go to get ready for work tonightComment
-
-
True but you will need to look long and hard to find anybody that comes close to the way Lucas played before the injury.Originally posted by Mattshark View Post
Losing him to the injuries was a terrible blow.Member #1 of the Luis Suarez fan clubComment
-
Originally posted by Mostar View Post
The only gracious way to accept an insult is to ignore it; if you can't ignore it, top it; if you can't top it, laugh at it; if you can't laugh at it, it's probably deserved.Comment
-
Just for the record do you know who really boils my piss? That soft cunt David Platt(not Corrie). Stands there like he's the ****ing epicenter of everything pointing and gesturing away. He only kopped the job 'cos he speaks Italian.He was waving imaginary cards last night too,the ****. He's one damn ugly ****er too. He reminds of what someone looks like through one of those glass spy-holes your Nan used to have in her front door. Boggie-eyed prick.I have one word to offer - honesty. I couldn't be devious if I tried. Joe Fagan.Comment
-
Interesting stats
@LFC_Formations
LFC vs MCFC: completed passes #LFC: 511/593 (86%) - 39 crosses MCFC: 256/311 (77%) - 8 crossesMember #1 of the Luis Suarez fan clubComment
-
Very interesting but Man City seemed to look like more of a goalscoring threat.Originally posted by Mostar View PostComment
-
Could be as they have about a quarter of a billion pounds worth in the attacking third and don't actually need to bother with crosses as they've got players who are technically pretty gifted?Comment
-
what makes you say that? is it the scoreline?dave of mutilation
Comment
-
Aye, but it is not like our forward line was cheap though was it? It was just ****.Originally posted by sean_lfc View PostComment
-
We weren't doing anything except getting it wide and putting in predictable crosses for Andy Carroll only to be headed away by Man Citys huge centre backs. We got the tactics and team selection all wrong. We looked far better when we got that draw against them before. We CAN do it but we were just poor going forward yesterday.Comment
-
The thing I've seen in City's play and also - most definitely in previous years - with United, and to some extent back when with Chelsea, the attacking prowess in numbers. That steam-rolling seems to win games and consequently titles. Look at Barca, same thing.
What REALLY ****ing frustrates me is that we often have just Carroll in the D, if even that. I mean what the ****? Is it that hard to commit 4-5-6 players into the final third. I just don't get it how often there is literally NO ONE in the box, beggars belief and I know **** all about football in the grand scheme of things, but if I were manager, it's the first thing I'd make sure of, attacking as a fluid 4-5 piece unit. Just don't get it. I see it time and time again, maybe I'm selectively remembering, but it's not the first time I've noticed it.Comment
Comment