New manager thread

[Red_Polo]

Don't agree with the main points SOS make there at all, but it is less embarrassing than a lot of their previous correspondence at least.

[DannyMan2006]

SOS are being ridiculous. FSG came in, had a look around, took some advice and proceeded to get it wrong.

Now they've been here a bit longer and have decided to shake things up. All the signs I see point to a completely new way of employing people within the club, a new system that hadn't been tried before.

Why don't people sit back and see how it all comes off before being so pathetic.

Most people's problem is inviting so many to interview. Even if this is true, I see little wrong with it. They have a new system in place and they need to ask each of them if they can work within it and how they'd take the club forward.

We need a modern manager who is willing to just get on with the job of coaching and improving a side instead of having to bother with all the other bollocks.

And the best thing is, splitting the roles and responsibilities makes people more accountable and also means that if someone fails, they can be moved on with minimum disruption.

I truly think it is a great idea and will work in the long term. And furthermore I expect other big clubs to take this method of working on in the future.

How successful it is short term depends on who we get for each role. It's trial & error, but I think in ten years time we'll look back and call it genius.

[fred_plasticine]

sos should've disbanded a long time ago. they are well and truly embarrassing.

[smphotog]

I would have thought rafa , with his obsessive compulsive personality , would be perfect with the moneyball type stats system they seem to favour.

(i hope so anyway....)

[Assassin]

SOS = The largest group of bellends ever to be assembled in the world.

[Buzzo]

SOS are being ridiculous. FSG came in, had a look around, took some advice and proceeded to get it wrong.

Now they've been here a bit longer and have decided to shake things up. All the signs I see point to a completely new way of employing people within the club, a new system that hadn't been tried before.

Why don't people sit back and see how it all comes off before being so pathetic.

Most people's problem is inviting so many to interview. Even if this is true, I see little wrong with it. They have a new system in place and they need to ask each of them if they can work within it and how they'd take the club forward.

We need a modern manager who is willing to just get on with the job of coaching and improving a side instead of having to bother with all the other bollocks.

And the best thing is, splitting the roles and responsibilities makes people more accountable and also means that if someone fails, they can be moved on with minimum disruption.

I truly think it is a great idea and will work in the long term. And furthermore I expect other big clubs to take this method of working on in the future.

How successful it is short term depends on who we get for each role. It's trial & error, but I think in ten years time we'll look back and call it genius.

good post.

[Mattshark]

SOS = The largest group of bellends ever to be assembled in the world.

they are an embarrassment to the club.

[kingfunk]

SOS are being ridiculous. FSG came in, had a look around, took some advice and proceeded to get it wrong.

Now they've been here a bit longer and have decided to shake things up. All the signs I see point to a completely new way of employing people within the club, a new system that hadn't been tried before.

Why don't people sit back and see how it all comes off before being so pathetic.

Most people's problem is inviting so many to interview. Even if this is true, I see little wrong with it. They have a new system in place and they need to ask each of them if they can work within it and how they'd take the club forward.

We need a modern manager who is willing to just get on with the job of coaching and improving a side instead of having to bother with all the other bollocks.

And the best thing is, splitting the roles and responsibilities makes people more accountable and also means that if someone fails, they can be moved on with minimum disruption.

I truly think it is a great idea and will work in the long term. And furthermore I expect other big clubs to take this method of working on in the future.

How successful it is short term depends on who we get for each role. It's trial & error, but I think in ten years time we'll look back and call it genius.

Aye aye

[cream]

I'm liking the direction the club is going, long term vision and a philosophy that will run throughout the club. Liverpool FC used to mean something, over the last 2/3 years we've become just another football club, it's about time we got our identity back. Forget about the short term, we can't really compete, but we can plan and build for a better future. It's about time we started doing things our own way, the Liverpool way.

[fred_plasticine]

SOS are being ridiculous. FSG came in, had a look around, took some advice and proceeded to get it wrong.

Now they've been here a bit longer and have decided to shake things up. All the signs I see point to a completely new way of employing people within the club, a new system that hadn't been tried before.

Why don't people sit back and see how it all comes off before being so pathetic.

Most people's problem is inviting so many to interview. Even if this is true, I see little wrong with it. They have a new system in place and they need to ask each of them if they can work within it and how they'd take the club forward.

We need a modern manager who is willing to just get on with the job of coaching and improving a side instead of having to bother with all the other bollocks.

And the best thing is, splitting the roles and responsibilities makes people more accountable and also means that if someone fails, they can be moved on with minimum disruption.

I truly think it is a great idea and will work in the long term. And furthermore I expect other big clubs to take this method of working on in the future.

How successful it is short term depends on who we get for each role. It's trial & error, but I think in ten years time we'll look back and call it genius.

[Rowan]

they are an embarrassment to the club.

If they stuck to directing their energies in the right places though they'd be great. Things like working with the club on away ticket allocations, increasing cheap transport for affiliated supporters clubs, work in the community.

There is real potential there, Matt me auld mate. They just spoil themselves with this unbelievably misplaced and deluded opinion of their own importance in the scheme of things. (which is so misplaced that it is almost funny).

[red g]

SOS = The largest group of bellends ever to be assembled in the world.

second largest

[peekay]

SOS are being ridiculous. FSG came in, had a look around, took some advice and proceeded to get it wrong.

Now they've been here a bit longer and have decided to shake things up. All the signs I see point to a completely new way of employing people within the club, a new system that hadn't been tried before.

Why don't people sit back and see how it all comes off before being so pathetic.

Most people's problem is inviting so many to interview. Even if this is true, I see little wrong with it. They have a new system in place and they need to ask each of them if they can work within it and how they'd take the club forward.

We need a modern manager who is willing to just get on with the job of coaching and improving a side instead of having to bother with all the other bollocks.

And the best thing is, splitting the roles and responsibilities makes people more accountable and also means that if someone fails, they can be moved on with minimum disruption.

I truly think it is a great idea and will work in the long term. And furthermore I expect other big clubs to take this method of working on in the future.

How successful it is short term depends on who we get for each role. It's trial & error, but I think in ten years time we'll look back and call it genius.

great post

My optimism will go down the drain if they appoint Martinez though

[G]

Dortmund are German Champions, they may not have Bayern's history but i'd class them as elite.

For me it's not whether a man has experience or not (Owl Face), it's whether they have the personality and ethos to manage us.

Very few clubs are elite in my mind, only Bayern fit that bill in Germany. Dortmund are champions yes but many clubs have won championships but never manage it consistently. Before Klopp arrived Dortmund where nowhere. If Klopp creates a winning dynasty and they go on to challenge over a sustained period they might join that elite.

Clubs like Bayern, the 2 Milan club's, Juve, Ajax, Real and Barca, us and United. They are the elite in terms of stature IMO.

[Mattshark]

If they stuck to directing their energies in the right places though they'd be great. Things like working with the club on away ticket allocations, increasing cheap transport for affiliated supporters clubs, work in the community.

There is real potential there, Matt me auld mate. They just spoil themselves with this unbelievably misplaced and deluded opinion of their own importance in the scheme of things. (which is so misplaced that it is almost funny).